Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: proj/en/perl/outdated-cpan-packages.xml automatic update

2008-10-02 Thread Robin H. Johnson
On Fri, Oct 03, 2008 at 07:33:11AM +0200, Torsten Veller wrote: > * "Robin H. Johnson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > On Thu, Oct 02, 2008 at 06:20:57PM -0700, Robin H. Johnson wrote: > > > To help out the perl team, I converted their up2date-ng script running > > > to be purely automatic from cvs.g.o no

[gentoo-dev] Re: proj/en/perl/outdated-cpan-packages.xml automatic update

2008-10-02 Thread Torsten Veller
* "Robin H. Johnson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On Thu, Oct 02, 2008 at 06:20:57PM -0700, Robin H. Johnson wrote: > > To help out the perl team, I converted their up2date-ng script running > > to be purely automatic from cvs.g.o now, it will run daily at 01h52 UTC. Thanks. > > If you touch up2date_pa

Re: [gentoo-dev] Testing is not a valid reason to package.mask

2008-10-02 Thread Jeroen Roovers
On Fri, 3 Oct 2008 04:23:33 +0200 Dawid Węgliński <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I don't think it's ok. ~arch isn't training ground. It's supposed to > work, so asking arch teams to keywords packages that are not supposed > to work isn't good. We have a "testing" branch and a "stable" branch, defin

Re: [gentoo-dev] Testing is not a valid reason to package.mask

2008-10-02 Thread Dawid Węgliński
On Friday 03 of October 2008 04:14:54 Jeroen Roovers wrote: > On Thu, 2 Oct 2008 17:56:39 -0700 > > "Alec Warner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > If pmask is not for testing...what is it for? > > The name says it all - to prevent people from automatically emerging > stuff, even when ACCEPT_KEYWORDS=

Re: [gentoo-dev] Testing is not a valid reason to package.mask

2008-10-02 Thread Jeroen Roovers
On Thu, 2 Oct 2008 17:56:39 -0700 "Alec Warner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > If pmask is not for testing...what is it for? The name says it all - to prevent people from automatically emerging stuff, even when ACCEPT_KEYWORDS=~arch is set. First you try for the new version: # emerge -va www-clien

Re: [gentoo-dev] proj/en/perl/outdated-cpan-packages.xml automatic update

2008-10-02 Thread Robin H. Johnson
On Thu, Oct 02, 2008 at 06:20:57PM -0700, Robin H. Johnson wrote: > Hi Folks, > > To help out the perl team, I converted their up2date-ng script running > to be purely automatic from cvs.g.o now, it will run daily at 01h52 UTC. > > If you touch up2date_package.altname or up2date_package.mask plea

[gentoo-dev] proj/en/perl/outdated-cpan-packages.xml automatic update

2008-10-02 Thread Robin H. Johnson
Hi Folks, To help out the perl team, I converted their up2date-ng script running to be purely automatic from cvs.g.o now, it will run daily at 01h52 UTC. If you touch up2date_package.altname or up2date_package.mask please give me a shout so I can ensure updated copies on the server. -- Robin Hu

Re: [gentoo-dev] Testing is not a valid reason to package.mask

2008-10-02 Thread Josh Saddler
Alec Warner wrote: > If pmask is not for testing...what is it for? UT GOTY and nvidia-drivers, of course! signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] Testing is not a valid reason to package.mask

2008-10-02 Thread Alec Warner
On Thu, Oct 2, 2008 at 1:24 PM, Jeroen Roovers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > # Gen 2 Developer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (`date`) > # Masked for testing. >>=rofl-cat/omgpkg-ver > > > Please people, > > > if you want to get something tested, then don't mask it.If you find > that you cannot commit an ebui

Re: [gentoo-dev] Testing is not a valid reason to package.mask

2008-10-02 Thread Jeremy Olexa
On Thu, Oct 2, 2008 at 3:30 PM, Jeroen Roovers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, 2 Oct 2008 22:24:35 +0200 > Jeroen Roovers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> # Gen 2 Developer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (`date`) >> # Masked for testing. >> >=rofl-cat/omgpkg-ver >> >> >> Please people, >> >> >>if you

Re: [gentoo-dev] Testing is not a valid reason to package.mask

2008-10-02 Thread Jeroen Roovers
On Thu, 2 Oct 2008 22:24:35 +0200 Jeroen Roovers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > # Gen 2 Developer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (`date`) > # Masked for testing. > >=rofl-cat/omgpkg-ver > > > Please people, > > >if you want to get something tested, then don't mask it. If you > find that you cannot comm

[gentoo-dev] Testing is not a valid reason to package.mask

2008-10-02 Thread Jeroen Roovers
# Gen 2 Developer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (`date`) # Masked for testing. >=rofl-cat/omgpkg-ver Please people, if you want to get something tested, then don't mask it. If you find that you cannot commit an ebuild because of badly keyworded dependencies, then drop the relevant keywords and file a

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] PROPERTIES=set for meta-packages that should behave like package sets

2008-10-02 Thread Robert Bridge
On Wed, 01 Oct 2008 09:37:25 -0700 Zac Medico <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Ryan Hill wrote: > > On Mon, 29 Sep 2008 22:31:46 -0700 > > Zac Medico <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >>> Can package.use syntax be extended to allow set entries? > >>