В Вск, 28/09/2008 в 20:24 +0200, Thomas Sachau пишет:
> I see many ebuild that still use "econf || die", also econf should die by
> itself. Are there any
> specific reasons for this? Some cases where econf does not die also it fails?
> Or some other reason
> for this?
This || die is redundant. P
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto wrote:
> Zac Medico wrote:
>> Bo Ørsted Andresen wrote:
>>> On Monday 29 September 2008 01:37:03 Zac Medico wrote:
> Why the need for multiple solutions at all? PROPERTIES=set is too weird
> and involves too much nons
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Zac Medico wrote:
> Bo Ørsted Andresen wrote:
>> On Monday 29 September 2008 01:37:03 Zac Medico wrote:
Why the need for multiple solutions at all? PROPERTIES=set is too weird
and involves too much nonsensical behaviour to be useful.
>>> I do
Zac Medico wrote:
> Steve Long wrote:
>> Zac Medico wrote:
>>> Rémi Cardona wrote:
As one of the maintainers of the gnome-base/gnome meta, I fail to see
the usefulness of such a change. We have yet to ask users to rebuild
"gnome" completely. Do you have any specific use cases (maybe
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Steve Long wrote:
> Zac Medico wrote:
>
>> Rémi Cardona wrote:
>>> Zac Medico a écrit :
Please consider a PROPERTIES=set value that allows an ebuild to
indicate that it should behave like a package set when selected on
the command line.
Zac Medico wrote:
> Rémi Cardona wrote:
>> Zac Medico a écrit :
>>> Please consider a PROPERTIES=set value that allows an ebuild to
>>> indicate that it should behave like a package set when selected on
>>> the command line. This is behavior is somewhat difficult to describe
>>> in words but the f
On Mon, 29 Sep 2008 21:24:55 +0200
Bo Ørsted Andresen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Monday 29 September 2008 10:27:51 Alexis Ballier wrote:
> > Maybe it would be worth adding repoman warnings/errors for econf
> > calls in eapi2 src_compile.
>
> Or make econf warn when run outside src_configure
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Bo Ørsted Andresen wrote:
> On Monday 29 September 2008 01:37:03 Zac Medico wrote:
>>> Why the need for multiple solutions at all? PROPERTIES=set is too weird
>>> and involves too much nonsensical behaviour to be useful.
>> I don't see the PROPERTIES=s
On Monday 29 September 2008 10:27:51 Alexis Ballier wrote:
> Maybe it would be worth adding repoman warnings/errors for econf calls in
> eapi2 src_compile.
Or make econf warn when run outside src_configure/src_compile depending upon
EAPI.
--
Bo Andresen
signature.asc
Description: This is a d
Alexis Ballier kirjoitti:
On Mon, 29 Sep 2008 09:38:41 +0200
Alexis Ballier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi Diego,
EAPI=2
[...]
src_compile() {
WX_GTK_VER="2.8"
need-wxwidgets unicode
econf \
This causes me a configure failure because I don't have a system
wxwdiget
+# Petteri Räty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (29 Sep 2008)
+# Live ebuilds are more appropriate to overlays.
+# See https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=227629
+# for more details.
+dev-lisp/abcl-cvs
+
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Ciaran McCreesh kirjoitti:
On Mon, 29 Sep 2008 21:39:41 +1300
Alistair Bush <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Anyway, would be nice to get some feedback, idea's on this and
hopefully also a more detailed explaination from a pm's perspective
(if there is one).
For current EAPIs, there's nothing speci
On Monday 29 September 2008 01:37:03 Zac Medico wrote:
> > Why the need for multiple solutions at all? PROPERTIES=set is too weird
> > and involves too much nonsensical behaviour to be useful.
>
> I don't see the PROPERTIES=set approach as being worse than any
> other approach for package set defin
On Mon, 29 Sep 2008 21:39:41 +1300
Alistair Bush <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Anyway, would be nice to get some feedback, idea's on this and
> hopefully also a more detailed explaination from a pm's perspective
> (if there is one).
For current EAPIs, there's nothing specifically wrong about chang
Zac Medico <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted [EMAIL PROTECTED],
excerpted below, on Sun, 28 Sep 2008 23:40:10 -0700:
> I'm not suggesting that the ebuild and the package set necessarily need
> to have the same name. What I'm suggesting is that we use a
> configuration file, distributed with the ebuild r
I was thinking about this a day or 2 ago and just noticed that a similar
situation has come up.
Please refer to https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=239006 but
basically.
=dev-java/ant-antlr-1.7.1 was changed from EAPI="1" to EAPI="2" to take
advantage of the use flag dep functionality.
now,
On Mon, 29 Sep 2008 09:38:41 +0200
Alexis Ballier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Diego,
>
>
> > EAPI=2
> [...]
> > src_compile() {
> > WX_GTK_VER="2.8"
> > need-wxwidgets unicode
> >
> > econf \
>
>
> This causes me a configure failure because I don't have a system
> wxwdigets pr
Hi Diego,
> EAPI=2
[...]
> src_compile() {
> WX_GTK_VER="2.8"
> need-wxwidgets unicode
>
> econf \
This causes me a configure failure because I don't have a system
wxwdigets profile set and need-wxwidgets doesn't seem to do anything.
1.3.5 is fine; -r1 fails at configure. I d
18 matches
Mail list logo
