On 23:13 Mon 22 Sep , Donnie Berkholz wrote:
> If you have something you'd wish for us to chat about, maybe even vote
> on, let us know! Simply reply to this e-mail for the whole Gentoo dev
> list to see.
Here's what I've got so far --
- Approving EAPI=2
- The eapi-2 branch of pms now ha
This is your friendly reminder ! Same bat time (typically the 2nd & 4th
Thursdays at 2000 UTC / 1600 EST), same bat channel (#gentoo-council @
irc.freenode.net) !
If you have something you'd wish for us to chat about, maybe even vote
on, let us know! Simply reply to this e-mail for the whole
On Mon, 22 Sep 2008 22:03:53 -0500
Jeremy Olexa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm thinking that a virtual/fonts package would be a good addition to
> the tree. We have hit this issue in Gentoo Prefix where any font
> package would satisfy a dependency. I also have an open bug where a
> package dep
# Joe Peterson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (22 Sep 2008)
# Masked for removal in 30 days (see bug #238442)
# Replaced by package: media-sound/squeezecenter
media-sound/slimserver
-Joe
Jeremy Olexa wrote:
# Jeremy Olexa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (12 Sep 2008)
# Masked for removal in 60 days. dead upstream, missed modular X
transition.
# See bug #127193
x11-terms/root-tail
I have lifted this mask. Multiple users have said that it works and they
want it in the tree. I also got it
On Mon, Sep 22, 2008 at 10:03:53PM -0500, Jeremy Olexa wrote:
> I'm thinking that a virtual/fonts package would be a good addition to the
> tree. We have hit this issue in Gentoo Prefix where any font package would
> satisfy a dependency. I also have an open bug where a package depends on
> core
I'm thinking that a virtual/fonts package would be a good addition to
the tree. We have hit this issue in Gentoo Prefix where any font package
would satisfy a dependency. I also have an open bug where a package
depends on corefonts but the reporter has stated that another fonts
package will wor
David Leverton kirjoitti:
On Saturday 20 September 2008 18:15:27 Alexis Ballier wrote:
I can think of checks like:
- foo is a dep/rdep of bar
- foo has a "plugin like" architecture
- bar will "work" with minimal foo
- most people will expect some features in bar that come with foo's
plugins
- we
Steve Long <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted
[EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on Mon, 22 Sep 2008 01:35:57
+0100:
>> This is an old rhetorical trick (I don't know its name in English): You
>> impute that I claimed things which I never said - of course, then it is
>> easy for you to prove that these t
"Alec Warner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted
[EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted
below, on Sun, 21 Sep 2008 18:35:04 -0700:
> gentoo-x86 uses bash; the ebuilds, the eclasses, they all rely on it.
> I'm pretty sure most package managers rely on bash as well, but I have
> not looked at the code outside of por
10 matches
Mail list logo
