Arun Raghavan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted
[EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on Sun, 17 Aug 2008
00:11:41 +0530:
> And then there's the sunrise overlay [1].
Yes, but sunrise doesn't (didn't?) take any packages already in the
tree. If it's not getting updated in-tree, however, and the only bloc
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
William Hubbs wrote:
>> As of Portage 2.2 the world set does not include the system
>> set any more. If you want emerge --update --deep @world to
>> update the system set too, you need to add @system to the new
>> world_sets file in /var/lib/portage/.
2008-08-17 03:46:11 William Hubbs napisał(a):
> On Sat, Aug 16, 2008 at 10:39:41PM +0300, Petteri R??ty wrote:
> > Title: World file handling changes in Portage-2.2
> > Author: Petteri R??ty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Author: Zac Medico <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Content-Type: text/plain
> > Posted: 2008
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sat, Aug 16, 2008 at 10:39:41PM +0300, Petteri R??ty wrote:
> Title: World file handling changes in Portage-2.2
> Author: Petteri R??ty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Author: Zac Medico <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Content-Type: text/plain
> Posted: 2008-XX-XX
> Re
As per glep 42 (http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/glep/glep-0042.html) here
is the required email for a new news item. This news item is important
because otherwise users will be missing updates to the system set if
they continue updating their system with the usual emerge --update
--deep world. Unl
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Robert Bridge wrote:
> On Sat, 16 Aug 2008 18:42:35 +0200
> Aniruddha <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> I've filed the bugreport (version bump) a year ago. It looks like borg
>> has no maintainer.
>
> So maintain it. You don't need to be a dev to write
It can be somewhat difficult to find someone to look over and commit an
ebuild on an unmaintained package though - the several times i've done that
have involved tracking down developers with previous commits to the package
or who are active in the category and trying to find one who isn't retired
On Sat, 16 Aug 2008 18:42:35 +0200
Aniruddha <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've filed the bugreport (version bump) a year ago. It looks like borg
> has no maintainer.
So maintain it. You don't need to be a dev to write an ebuild, and
there are enough devs who are happy to throw an eye over user do
On Sat, 2008-08-16 at 19:30 +0100, Robert Bridge wrote:
> On Sat, 16 Aug 2008 09:17:10 +0200
> Aniruddha <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Borg hasn't been updated in portage for a while despite the fact that
> > new versions were released over a year ago (see
> > http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.c
On Sat, 16 Aug 2008 09:17:10 +0200
Aniruddha <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Borg hasn't been updated in portage for a while despite the fact that
> new versions were released over a year ago (see
> http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=184699 ). Therefor I suggest
> app-office/borg gets removed fr
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Alin Năstac wrote:
> Every once in a while, I get bitten by the $Id keyword replacement done
> on patches in $FILESDIR.
>
> Can we do something to fix this annoyance? If repoman cannot add -kb for
> *.patch and *.diff files, at least it should verify
Every once in a while, I get bitten by the $Id keyword replacement done
on patches in $FILESDIR.
Can we do something to fix this annoyance? If repoman cannot add -kb for
*.patch and *.diff files, at least it should verify you have added those
files with this options.
signature.asc
Description:
Hi,
Borg hasn't been updated in portage for a while despite the fact that
new versions were released over a year ago (see
http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=184699 ). Therefor I suggest
app-office/borg gets removed from portage.
Regards,
Aniruddha
13 matches
Mail list logo
