Hi,
Thomas Anderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Sun, Jul 20, 2008 at 08:44:24AM +0200, Christian Faulhammer wrote:
> > app-admin/tmpwatch -- low maintenance
> >
> I can take this one.
Please add yourself and reassing bugs.
> > dev-cpp/libthrowable,
> > app-portage/gatt -- very cooperativ
Hi,
Alexis Ballier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > dev-lang/erlang (lang-misc) -- a version bump now and then (four
> > times a year), seldomly but then obscure bugs, cooperative upstream
>
> I would appreciate if you could take care of my fbsd problem ;p
Done.
> > media-sound/cmus -- low maint
The attached list notes all of the packages that were added or removed
from the tree, for the week ending 2008-07-20 23h59 UTC.
Removals:
Additions:
sci-astronomy/wcslib2008-07-15 15:16:24 bicatali
net-irc/irssi-otr 2008-07-16 14:10:55 armin76
dev-python/Babel
On Sunday 20 July 2008, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 20, 2008 at 10:19:10AM +, Peter Alfredsen (loki_val)
wrote:
> > loki_val08/07/20 10:19:10
> >
> > Modified: openldap-2.4.7.ebuild
> > openldap-2.4.10.ebuild openldap-2.3.41.ebuild
> > Log:
> > Propagate fix for
On Sat, Jul 19, 2008 at 11:39 AM, Nikos Chantziaras <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Reading around on the net, it amazes me how many people are using developer
> profiles for their Gentoo because they think it's for software developers
> and don't see that it's for Gentoo developers and not intended f
On Sun, Jul 20, 2008 at 08:44:24AM +0200, Christian Faulhammer wrote:
> app-admin/tmpwatch -- low maintenance
>
I can take this one.
> dev-cpp/libthrowable,
> app-portage/gatt -- very cooperative upstream for both (mlangc for
> both)
>
I can also take these two as well, as I use them for
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
All,
I am looking for someone who would be interested in taking
maintainership of the following:
app-accessibility/festival
app-accessibility/speech-tools
There are several open bugs against festival and requests to add some
new voices as well which
Peter Volkov wrote:
> This means that every ebuild which uses 'unpack ${A}' should have in
> DEPEND a program which is selected by filename extension of sources. So
> as I understood your initial suggestion was to make this happen
> automatically. And this is very logical as makes ebuilds cleaner a
On Sun, Jul 20, 2008 at 10:19:10AM +, Peter Alfredsen (loki_val) wrote:
> loki_val08/07/20 10:19:10
>
> Modified: openldap-2.4.7.ebuild openldap-2.4.10.ebuild
> openldap-2.3.41.ebuild
> Log:
> Propagate fix for glibc-2.8 to more versions, including
Hi,
> dev-lang/erlang (lang-misc) -- a version bump now and then (four
> times a year), seldomly but then obscure bugs, cooperative upstream
I would appreciate if you could take care of my fbsd problem ;p
> mail-client/claws-mail and all plugins (net-mail) -- a version bump
> is some work, b
On Sun, 20 Jul 2008 17:41:58 +0400
Peter Volkov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> В Чтв, 17/07/2008 в 04:51 +0200, Marius Mauch пишет:
> > At dev.gentoo.org/~genone/unpack.eclass is the draft for an eclass
> > to implement this feature.
>
> Marius, although it's possible to do this things in eclass
On 2008-07-20 17:38, Peter Volkov uttered these thoughts:
> В Вск, 13/07/2008 в 23:52 +0100, Ciaran McCreesh пишет:
> > Which part of the 'Problem' section in the GLEP didn't you understand?
> > Do you seriously consider not being able to add or change global scope
> > functions in future EAPIs to
On Sun, 20 Jul 2008 17:38:32 +0400
Peter Volkov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> В Вск, 13/07/2008 в 23:52 +0100, Ciaran McCreesh пишет:
> > Which part of the 'Problem' section in the GLEP didn't you
> > understand? Do you seriously consider not being able to add or
> > change global scope functions in
В Чтв, 17/07/2008 в 04:51 +0200, Marius Mauch пишет:
> At dev.gentoo.org/~genone/unpack.eclass is the draft for an eclass
> to implement this feature.
Marius, although it's possible to do this things in eclass why is eclass
better? As I see portage's unpack() already has extension <-> "program
t
В Вск, 13/07/2008 в 23:52 +0100, Ciaran McCreesh пишет:
> Which part of the 'Problem' section in the GLEP didn't you understand?
> Do you seriously consider not being able to add or change global scope
> functions in future EAPIs to be a non-issue, or were you ignoring those
> two bullet points?
I
Ben de Groot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted [EMAIL PROTECTED],
excerpted below, on Sun, 20 Jul 2008 02:48:48 +0200:
> Jeremy Olexa wrote:
>> Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
>>> Some kind of warning or other mechanism that does selecting this
>>> profile without knowing what you're doing would be a good idea
В Втр, 01/07/2008 в 05:05 +0300, Mart Raudsepp пишет:
> Over a year or two ago, it was communicated that it supposedly a policy
> that USE=static
Well, I don't have web-reference at hand now, but there was a thread in
gentoo-dev with the subject: "Say no to static libraries!". Summarizing
some ide
17 matches
Mail list logo
