On 04:03 Tue 08 Jul , Andrey Grozin wrote:
> On Mon, 7 Jul 2008, Donnie Berkholz wrote:
>> I actually object to having crap in dev-python, because things should be
>> categorized functionally instead of by the language they're implemented
>> in. 90% of the time you don't care about the language
Donnie Berkholz wrote:
> I meant moves were largely pointless, although categories are to a
> lesser extent. Tags would be a lot better, since nothing can be
> categorized perfectly into a single place.
Yes, I can see the benefit of a tag paradigm. I, myself, find it more
trouble than benefit t
On Mon, Jul 7, 2008 at 8:51 PM, Joe Peterson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Donnie Berkholz wrote:
>> I actually object to having crap in dev-python, because things should be
>> categorized functionally instead of by the language they're implemented
>> in. 90% of the time you don't care about the lan
On Mon, 7 Jul 2008, Donnie Berkholz wrote:
I actually object to having crap in dev-python, because things should be
categorized functionally instead of by the language they're implemented
in. 90% of the time you don't care about the language. But category
moves are pretty much pointless, so I don
On 21:51 Mon 07 Jul , Joe Peterson wrote:
> Donnie Berkholz wrote:
> > I actually object to having crap in dev-python, because things should be
> > categorized functionally instead of by the language they're implemented
> > in. 90% of the time you don't care about the language. But category
Donnie Berkholz wrote:
> I actually object to having crap in dev-python, because things should be
> categorized functionally instead of by the language they're implemented
> in. 90% of the time you don't care about the language. But category
> moves are pretty much pointless, so I don't normally
On 02:59 Tue 08 Jul , Andrey Grozin wrote:
> Wouldn't it be nice to move scipy from sci-libs to dev-python? All
> similar and related packages live in dev-python: numeric,
> scientificpython, matplotlib... I know that moving packages is a major
> pain in the #$$, but the present situation se
Hello *,
Wouldn't it be nice to move scipy from sci-libs to dev-python? All similar
and related packages live in dev-python: numeric, scientificpython,
matplotlib... I know that moving packages is a major pain in the #$$, but
the present situation seems illogical (I would never guess to search
On Mon, 7 Jul 2008 10:10:14 -0400
Jim Ramsay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Here's an interesting solution for those who find it annoying though:
> Just file your own 0-day bump request in bugzilla. In theory some
> users would find this and just CC themselves on it. Other users could
> be shushed w
On Mon, 2008-07-07 at 15:33 +, Duncan wrote:
> Jim Ramsay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted [EMAIL PROTECTED],
> excerpted below, on Mon, 07 Jul 2008 10:10:14 -0400:
>
> > Here's an interesting solution for those who find it annoying though:
> > Just file your own 0-day bump request in bugzilla. In
Jim Ramsay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted [EMAIL PROTECTED],
excerpted below, on Mon, 07 Jul 2008 10:10:14 -0400:
> Here's an interesting solution for those who find it annoying though:
> Just file your own 0-day bump request in bugzilla. In theory some users
> would find this and just CC themselves
Jeroen Roovers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 1) How do you feel when you receive an early version bump request?
I think any version bump request at any time is worthwhile. The earlier
the better!
> 2) If you had your way, would you discourage users from filing early
> version bump requests?
No.
12 matches
Mail list logo
