Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in profiles: package.mask

2008-06-21 Thread Peter Weller
On Sat, 2008-06-21 at 11:38 -0700, Robin H. Johnson wrote: > On Sat, Jun 21, 2008 at 10:56:51AM +0200, Albert Zeyer wrote: > > > Thus whenever you change anything in arch profile, or in base or > > > features subdirectory use relevant ChangeLog. For other changes like > > > local USE flags document

[gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-dev-announce] Gentoo Bugzilla going live on CACert certificates

2008-06-21 Thread Robin H. Johnson
On Sat, Jun 21, 2008 at 04:00:18PM -0700, Robin H. Johnson wrote: > In a couple of minutes, bugs.gentoo.org should flip over to using > CACert-issued SSL certificates. The actual key is the same as before, > just a certificate and new CA chain in place. For anybody with issues with their browser no

Re: [gentoo-dev] "unrecognized option" warning

2008-06-21 Thread Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis
2008-06-21 20:27:59 Hanno Böck napisał(a): > Hi, > > I was pointed by a user that the gimp ebuilds configure run produces warnings > about unrecognized options. > Looks like this: > configure: WARNING: Unrecognized options: --with-hal, --without-wmf > > A short grep over my portage logdir showed

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in profiles: package.mask

2008-06-21 Thread Robin H. Johnson
On Sat, Jun 21, 2008 at 10:56:51AM +0200, Albert Zeyer wrote: > > Thus whenever you change anything in arch profile, or in base or > > features subdirectory use relevant ChangeLog. For other changes like > > local USE flags documentation, masking/unmasking/updating masks (not > > comments :)) use /

[gentoo-dev] "unrecognized option" warning

2008-06-21 Thread Hanno Böck
Hi, I was pointed by a user that the gimp ebuilds configure run produces warnings about unrecognized options. Looks like this: configure: WARNING: Unrecognized options: --with-hal, --without-wmf A short grep over my portage logdir showed lots of these in various packages. My suggestion would be

[gentoo-dev] Re: EAPI-2 - Let's get it started

2008-06-21 Thread Ryan Hill
On Wed, 11 Jun 2008 14:20:03 +0200 Luca Barbato <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Santiago M. Mola wrote: > > Upstream clearly states that a gmp build which tests have failed > > shouldn't be used. I bet they deny support for users who fail to > > follow that indication ;-) > > gmp isn't a key compone

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Lastriting dev-libs/libffi (replaced by USE libffi in gcc itself)

2008-06-21 Thread Albert Zeyer
On Sat, 2008-06-21 at 09:35 +0200, Tiziano Müller wrote: > Donnie Berkholz wrote: > > > On 14:52 Thu 05 Jun , Samuli Suominen wrote: > >> # Samuli Suominen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (05 Jun 2008) > >> # Masked for removal in ~30 days by treecleaners. > >> # Replaced by USE libffi in sys-devel/gcc.

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in profiles: package.mask

2008-06-21 Thread Albert Zeyer
On Sat, 2008-06-21 at 10:43 +0400, Peter Volkov wrote: > В Чтв, 19/06/2008 в 21:03 +, Michael Sterrett (mr_bones_) пишет: > > mr_bones_08/06/19 21:03:29 > > > > Modified: package.mask > > Log: > > mask =games-kids/gcompris-8.4.5 until > > http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bu

[gentoo-dev] Re: Lastriting dev-libs/libffi (replaced by USE libffi in gcc itself)

2008-06-21 Thread Tiziano Müller
Donnie Berkholz wrote: > On 14:52 Thu 05 Jun , Samuli Suominen wrote: >> # Samuli Suominen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (05 Jun 2008) >> # Masked for removal in ~30 days by treecleaners. >> # Replaced by USE libffi in sys-devel/gcc. Bug 163724. >> dev-libs/libffi >> dev-lang/squeak >> x11-libs/gtk-serv