William L. Thomson Jr. wrote:
> On Wed, 2008-06-04 at 20:52 -0400, William L. Thomson Jr. wrote:
>> I think a more ideal solution, less drastic to implement might be
>> allowing 2 arguments to be passed. So you could do like
>>
>> elog "" "A blank line precedes this one"
>> elog "A blank line foll
On Wed, 2008-06-04 at 20:52 -0400, William L. Thomson Jr. wrote:
>
> I think a more ideal solution, less drastic to implement might be
> allowing 2 arguments to be passed. So you could do like
>
> elog "" "A blank line precedes this one"
> elog "A blank line follow this one" ""
Actually 3, not s
On Wed, 2008-06-04 at 18:45 -0600, Ryan Hill wrote:
>
> I just throw a couple echos around any output.
Surely more than one way
> I think doing any kind of automatic pretty-print formatting is
> overkill, but that's just my opinion.
Yes to a point. Starting having multiple blocks like that, and
Speaking more officially, less personal opinion.
On Wed, 2008-06-04 at 18:49 -0400, Richard Freeman wrote:
>
> Would this run into any kinds of legal issues?
Should prevent any.
> If you're not
> already familiar with such things you might want to talk to a lawyer.
As it pertains we will likel
On Wed, 04 Jun 2008 15:31:58 -0600
Joe Peterson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> William L. Thomson Jr. wrote:
> > Just a quick thought looking over a couple ebuilds. It seems most
> > times anyone does a error, elog, einfo, or similar. They start and
> > end with a few blank lines. Calls with no argu
Hi guys,
Nominations for the Gentoo Council 2008/2009 are open now and will be
open for the next two weeks (until 23:59 UTC, 18/06/2008).
All nominations must be sent to the gentoo-dev mailing list. If you
were nominated and want to run, you have to accept your nomination on
the same mailing list
William L. Thomson Jr. wrote:
Which one of the first things wrt to the Council that would be mentioned
in the Bylaws is the Council has full authority and veto power over the
project. That means the board nor officers can dictate to the Council.
Council remains on top of it all. Just legally decl
William L. Thomson Jr. wrote:
> Just a quick thought looking over a couple ebuilds. It seems most times
> anyone does a error, elog, einfo, or similar. They start and end with a
> few blank lines. Calls with no arguments.
>
> Is there any reason not to make that a default? Other than difficulty of
On Tue, 2008-06-03 at 18:17 +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> On Tue, 3 Jun 2008 19:11:44 +0200
> Jeroen Roovers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Also, I would have thought there was a requirement to have been a
> > developer for at least a year, just like we require mentors to have
> > been a develope
On Tue, 2008-06-03 at 11:31 +0100, George Prowse wrote:
> Alex Howells wrote:
> > 2008/6/3 George Prowse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >> Thirded
> >
> > Someone can clarify but don't you need to be a Foundation member to
> > nominate or support nominations?
> >
> > Either way, all of the current Counci
Just a quick thought looking over a couple ebuilds. It seems most times
anyone does a error, elog, einfo, or similar. They start and end with a
few blank lines. Calls with no arguments.
Is there any reason not to make that a default? Other than difficulty of
implementation. Anytime they are invoke
Jeroen Roovers wrote:
> On Mon, 02 Jun 2008 20:25:29 +0200
> Christian Hoffmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> I think we should be consistent here
>
> You may also want to consider the following:
> threadsonly [dev-libs/boost]
No, you don't want to: That flag got removed in later versions a
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò) writes:
> Please refrain from using those if you can.
As I was asked for an example see this commit I made today:
http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/gentoo-x86/app-backup/boxbackup/boxbackup-0.10.ebuild?r1=1.9&r2=1.10
the original ebuild used the
I stumbled across another ebuild today that used the upstream-provided
bootstrap script to rebuild autotools.
Please refrain from using those if you can.
Upstream doesn't always know better for our setup (it may try to second
guess our settings by looking for particular automake/autoconf
version
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Richard Freeman wrote:
| Duncan wrote:
|> Ryan Hill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted
|> [EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on
|> Tue, 03
|> Jun 2008 22:26:20 -0600:
|>
|>> AFAIR nominating has always been open to anyone, dev and user alike.
|>
|> Which doe
Duncan wrote:
Ryan Hill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted
[EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on Tue, 03
Jun 2008 22:26:20 -0600:
AFAIR nominating has always been open to anyone, dev and user alike.
Which does make sense. Giving the community nomination power gives them
some input, while limiting
Ryan Hill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted
[EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on Tue, 03
Jun 2008 22:26:20 -0600:
> AFAIR nominating has always been open to anyone, dev and user alike.
Which does make sense. Giving the community nomination power gives them
some input, while limiting the actual powe
17 matches
Mail list logo
