Marius Mauch a écrit :
So, do you think it should be enabled by default?
Does portage have a way to report which libraries it is keeping around
because of preserve-libs ? If there's an easy way to figure that out,
then enabling it by default is a very sane and sound idea.
Cheers,
Rémi
--
g
On 01:13 Thu 29 May , Marius Mauch wrote:
> One concern raised by some people is that it might cause old libraries
> with security issues to stay on the system for eternity even though
> the package was upgraded, and eventually be preferred by new builds.
> I can't rule this out completely but
On Thu, 29 May 2008 01:13:16 +0200
Marius Mauch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So, do you think it should be enabled by default?
Yes please. :) I haven't had any problems in the couple of months
i've been using it.
--
fonts, gcc-porting, by design, by neglect
mips,
As portage-2.2 is about to be unmasked into ~arch soon (there is one
weird bug to solve before) it's time to ask for some input on one of
the important new features, FEATURES=preserve-libs.
(if you're already familiar with it you can skip this paragraph)
Simply said, when this feature is enabled p
On Wed, May 28, 2008 at 09:03:33AM +0200, Krzysiek Pawlik wrote:
> * net-im/jabberd & net-im/jabberd2 - thanks to work from Marko Durkovic
> both are easy to maintain
I can take jabberd(maybe jabberd2 too) by proxy, until I finish my
quizzes.
--
gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
There are few packages that could use some more loving:
* app-editors/scite - easy to maintain, has only one bug open wrt French
locales & UTF-8
* media-video/griffith - also easy, pending version bump
* net-im/jabberd & net-im/jabberd2 - thanks to work from Marko Durkovic both
are easy to
