On Mon, 12 May 2008 02:58:55 +0200
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò) wrote:
> - bison and flex should get out of the system package set, what
> clearer than moving them out of sys-*?
"system" and the sys-* categories don't have much of a relationsship,
so that's no argument IMO.
> Ye
On Sun, 11 May 2008 19:46:36 -0600
Ryan Hill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I guess I don't see the point. If you do move them, don't forget
> about documentation changes.
Also consider that people searching for bugs about dev-util/ccache for
example won't find many results.
--
fonts, gcc-portin
On Mon, 12 May 2008 02:58:55 +0200
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò) wrote:
> - bison and flex should get out of the system package set, what
> clearer than moving them out of sys-*? They are not so commonly used
> so there should no compelling reason to have them installed on every
>
I've been thinking today that we have a lot of things in sys-devel that
shouldn't probably be there, like pmake and bmake.
I'd propose the following move, if nobody has arguments aginst those:
sys-devel/bmake -> dev-util/bmake
sys-devel/pmake -> dev-util/pmake
sys-devel/bison -> dev-util/bison
s
The attached list notes all of the packages that were added or removed
from the tree, for the week ending 2008-05-11 23h59 UTC.
Removals:
java-virtuals/sun-jdk 2008-05-05 00:35:28 betelgeuse
x11-misc/grpn 2008-05-10 00:12:32 drac
xfce-extra/squeeze
Potential candidates (flag-name, count):
pch 18
server14
custom-cflags 9
logrotate 8
gsm 7
demo 7
multislot 6
audacious 6
* Christian Hartmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> See bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=138755
x11-misc/perlpanel -> Attic today.
--
gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
