>
> On 2008-05-01 03:20, Duft Markus wrote:
> > Hi!
> >
> > Just read the mail-archive and (i'm not at work), and felt that I
> have
> > to say something about the binary packages on windows ;) (so sorry
> for
> > what the outlook web-access thingy does to emails and threads :))
>
> Have you seen
The attached list notes all of the packages that were added or removed
from the tree, for the week ending 2008-05-04 23h59 UTC.
Removals:
app-admin/dirvish 2008-04-28 20:11:59 ramereth
sys-libs/hardened-glibc 2008-04-29 01:05:44 pappy
sys-devel/hardened-gcc 2
On Sun, May 04, 2008 at 01:09:34PM -0700, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
> > I don't have a more accurate time estimate of when yet, but downtimes
> > are going to be minimal, as the flips will be near-live.
> I'm moving bugzilla in <30 minutes.
> Starting at 20h30 UTC.
Migration is done.
Please see bug
On Fri, May 02, 2008 at 12:02:47AM -0700, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
> Hopefully sometime THIS weekend, I'll be moving Bugzilla as well at our
> VCS services (CVS/SVN/Git on stork.gentoo.org) to new machines.
>
> I don't have a more accurate time estimate of when yet, but downtimes
> are going to be
Le lundi 23 juillet 2007 à 01:24 -0400, Mike Frysinger a écrit :
> for people who maintain a package which utilizes bindnow-flags(), please feel
> free to modify the ebuild to no longer use this or append any such ldflags.
> the logic for handling set*id bindings is the business of the ldso (aka
Thu, 01 May 2008 13:11:47 +0200
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò) kirjoitti:
> Hanno Böck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Beside, I'm asking myself how to handle this situation. Hard-enable
> > them all as long as there are no patches? Let the automagic go in
> > the tree? Opinions
