-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ulrich Mueller wrote:
|> On Thu, 24 Apr 2008, Luis Francisco Araujo wrote:
|
|> | One other thing is that it is sometimes difficult to figure out to
|> | whom a bug should be assigned, because metadata.xml for many packages
|> | simply isn't clear
> On Thu, 24 Apr 2008, Luis Francisco Araujo wrote:
> | One other thing is that it is sometimes difficult to figure out to
> | whom a bug should be assigned, because metadata.xml for many packages
> | simply isn't clear. If you list a few developers as well as a herd,
> | does that mean you wa
On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 10:05:35PM +0200, Jeroen Roovers wrote:
> All in all I guess we need to make the rules up as we go and decide
> policy later. I suggest the first herd/address in the list should be
> the primary contact. If you don't agree with that, please consult
> metadata.xml for the pac
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jeroen Roovers wrote:
| Hi developers and other users,
|
|
| since jakub[1] went completely missing a few weeks ago a few others and
| I have been wrangling the bugs. I've heard rumours that this isn't
| working smoothly yet. Of course most of th
On Thursday 24 April 2008, Luca Barbato wrote:
> Roy Marples wrote:
> > On Thursday 24 April 2008 00:01:01 Robin H. Johnson wrote:
> >> The problem in this is that you cannot set the properties for each
> >> address or route. Please don't take us back to the stoneage of writing
> >> the advanced ne
On Thursday 24 April 2008, Jeroen Roovers wrote:
> One other thing is that it is sometimes difficult to figure out to
> whom a bug should be assigned, because metadata.xml for many packages
> simply isn't clear. If you list a few developers as well as a herd,
> does that mean you want bugs assigned
Hi developers and other users,
since jakub[1] went completely missing a few weeks ago a few others and
I have been wrangling the bugs. I've heard rumours that this isn't
working smoothly yet. Of course most of that can be fully blamed on
bugzilla itself, but there are some things that need t
Wed, 23 Apr 2008 20:52:59 +0100
Daniel Drake <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> kirjoitti:
> Samuli Suominen wrote:
> > # Samuli Suominen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (21 Apr 2008)
> > # Masked by treecleaners for bug 160267. Removed in ~60 days.
> > # Has been included in 2.6 kernel series.
> > net-fs/coda-kernel
>
> A
Roy Marples <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Wednesday 23 April 2008 23:01:38 Graham Murray wrote:
>> It looks to me as though you are intending to remove the capability to
>> set up complex network environments.
>
> No I'm not.
> I'm making it easy for simple configs AND complex ones. Just not th
David Shakaryan wrote:
# David Shakaryan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (24 Apr 2008)
# Masked for removal in 30 days. (bug #197277)
# Extremely old compilation of themes not utilising new features.
# Openbox is intended to move to a new theme format in the future.
x11-themes/openbox-themes
Argh! Regardin
# David Shakaryan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (24 Apr 2008)
# Masked for removal in 30 days. (bug #197277)
# Extremely old compilation of themes not utilising new features.
# Openbox is intended to move to a new theme format in the future.
x11-themes/openbox-themes
--
David Shakaryan
--
gentoo-dev@lists.
Roy Marples wrote:
On Thursday 24 April 2008 00:01:01 Robin H. Johnson wrote:
The problem in this is that you cannot set the properties for each
address or route. Please don't take us back to the stoneage of writing
the advanced networking configuration manually.
As an example of an ip address
12 matches
Mail list logo
