Re: [gentoo-dev] What are blocks used for?

2008-04-15 Thread Ciaran McCreesh
On Wed, 16 Apr 2008 07:54:48 +0200 "Mateusz A. Mierzwin'ski" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > And I strongly suggest to leave old mechanism of portage, because we > saw couple times what _GREAT_ automatic makes with distro - eg. > Mandriva with all creators and cheap installer - couple apps not > runni

Re: [gentoo-dev] What are blocks used for?

2008-04-15 Thread Mateusz A. Mierzwin'ski
Ciaran McCreesh pisze: What all are blocks used for? a) Marking that two unrelated packages are mutually incompatible at runtime because they happen to collide, for example on a commonly named executable. b) Marking that two related implementations are mutually incompatible at runtime because t

[gentoo-dev] What are blocks used for?

2008-04-15 Thread Ciaran McCreesh
What all are blocks used for? a) Marking that two unrelated packages are mutually incompatible at runtime because they happen to collide, for example on a commonly named executable. b) Marking that two related implementations are mutually incompatible at runtime because they both provide the same

[gentoo-dev] adding OpenRC to emerge --info output

2008-04-15 Thread Doug Goldstein
All, I'll be adding sys-apps/openrc to info_pkgs in the profiles. That's all. -- Doug Goldstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://dev.gentoo.org/~cardoe/ -- gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org mailing list

[gentoo-dev] Early stabilisation

2008-04-15 Thread Jeroen Roovers
Dear ebuild maintainers, thirty days is the norm for the minimal period between an ebuilds last non-keywording change while in the tree and the usual call for stabilisation. If you cannot find a pressing reason to push stabilisation forward, then don't ask. In the last few days I have seen s

Re: [gentoo-dev] escaping variables in sed expressions

2008-04-15 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Tuesday 15 April 2008, Marijn Schouten (hkBst) wrote: > Hi list, > > it seems I have been using some fragile sed expression and I'd like to tap > the collective wisdom for avoiding doing that in the future. > > dev-scheme/slib-3.1.5-r1 currently does > > sed "s_prefix = /usr/local/_prefix = ${D}

Re: [gentoo-dev] escaping variables in sed expressions

2008-04-15 Thread Marius Mauch
On Tue, 15 Apr 2008 16:17:54 +0200 Frank Gruellich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > * Santiago M. Mola <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 15. Apr 08: > > On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 1:14 PM, Marijn Schouten (hkBst) > > Currently is use ':' as sed delimiter when paths are involved. I'd > > also like to hear from you abou

Re: [gentoo-dev] escaping variables in sed expressions

2008-04-15 Thread Marijn Schouten (hkBst)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Petteri Räty wrote: | You should just fix the Makefile to respect DESTDIR and send the patch | upstream. You're right of course, but that is only the right way for this specific instance and not a general way of handling tricky sed expressions. Mar

Re: [gentoo-dev] escaping variables in sed expressions

2008-04-15 Thread Petteri Räty
Marijn Schouten (hkBst) kirjoitti: Hi list, it seems I have been using some fragile sed expression and I'd like to tap the collective wisdom for avoiding doing that in the future. dev-scheme/slib-3.1.5-r1 currently does sed "s_prefix = /usr/local/_prefix = ${D}/usr/_" -i Makefile to make it

Re: [gentoo-dev] escaping variables in sed expressions

2008-04-15 Thread Frank Gruellich
* Santiago M. Mola <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 15. Apr 08: > On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 1:14 PM, Marijn Schouten (hkBst) > Currently is use ':' as sed delimiter when paths are involved. I'd > also like to hear from you about proper delimiters if you think ':' is > not safe enough. > > AFAIK, the only corner

Re: [gentoo-dev] escaping variables in sed expressions

2008-04-15 Thread Ulrich Mueller
> On Tue, 15 Apr 2008, Marijn Schouten (hkBst) wrote: > There are several option to handle this. I could use a less common > delimiter or I could escape it: ${D//_/\_} instead of ${D}. I could > use a sed expression that doesn't suffer from this problem (thanks > to dleverton): > sed -ne '\_^

Re: [gentoo-dev] escaping variables in sed expressions

2008-04-15 Thread David Leverton
On Tuesday 15 April 2008 12:14:57 Marijn Schouten (hkBst) wrote: > There are several option to handle this. I could use a less common > delimiter or I could escape it: ${D//_/\_} instead of ${D}. I could use a > sed expression that doesn't suffer from this problem (thanks to dleverton): > > sed -ne

Re: [gentoo-dev] escaping variables in sed expressions

2008-04-15 Thread Fabian Groffen
On 15-04-2008 13:05:26 +0200, Santiago M. Mola wrote: > On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 1:14 PM, Marijn Schouten (hkBst) > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Hi list, > > > > it seems I have been using some fragile sed expression and I'd like to tap > > the collective > > wisdom for avoiding doing that

Re: [gentoo-dev] escaping variables in sed expressions

2008-04-15 Thread Santiago M. Mola
On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 1:14 PM, Marijn Schouten (hkBst) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi list, > > it seems I have been using some fragile sed expression and I'd like to tap > the collective > wisdom for avoiding doing that in the future. > > dev-scheme/slib-3.1.5-r1 currently does > > sed "

[gentoo-dev] escaping variables in sed expressions

2008-04-15 Thread Marijn Schouten (hkBst)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi list, it seems I have been using some fragile sed expression and I'd like to tap the collective wisdom for avoiding doing that in the future. dev-scheme/slib-3.1.5-r1 currently does sed "s_prefix = /usr/local/_prefix = ${D}/usr/_" -i Makefile