Vaeth wrote:
Result: Compiles fine with gcc-4.3 on x86 but dies immediately
at boot (before printing anything) unless acpi=off is used.
(And just to be sure, I disabled every acpi feature except
"general" acpi support - same result).
Please file a bug at bugs,gentoo.org, our hardened team surel
Mike Kelly wrote:
On Thu, 10 Apr 2008 16:35:36 -0400
Doug Goldstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
How does everyone feel about the proposed layout and syntaxes of GLEP
27?
Do we want to revisit this GLEP with an updated GLEP or status quo?
http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/glep/glep-0027.html
> So the point is, our current 2.6.24 kernel is safe.
I can *not* confirm this. Just some days ago, I compiled
hardened-sources-2.6.24 (which uses genpatches-2.6.24-5;
current gentoo-sources uses genpatches-2.6.24-6, but the
difference is obviously not important here [it involves
just an #include
On Thu, 10 Apr 2008 16:35:36 -0400
Doug Goldstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> How does everyone feel about the proposed layout and syntaxes of GLEP
> 27?
>
> Do we want to revisit this GLEP with an updated GLEP or status quo?
>
> http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/glep/glep-0027.html
This was my So
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> On Thu, 10 Apr 2008 17:37:31 -0700
> "Robin H. Johnson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> That's why I setup them up with the ability to rsync it, and they
>> never got back to me on that, nor used it ever.
>
> Hrm, curious. They seem interested and alive currently. Perhaps it
> My specific interest in it is for having a sane UID/GIDs that are
> identical between a set of machines, regardless of the order packages
> are emerged in.
I was initially surprised to see Gentoo didn't have written standards
for UID/GID management, but don't see many other distros having one
Robin H. Johnson wrote:
My specific interest in it is for having a sane UID/GIDs that are
identical between a set of machines, regardless of the order packages
are emerged in.
Same here. Which is why I'm hoping to revitalize GLEP 27.
--
Doug Goldstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://dev.gentoo.or
On 10-04-2008 16:35:36 -0400, Doug Goldstein wrote:
> How does everyone feel about the proposed layout and syntaxes of GLEP 27?
>
> Do we want to revisit this GLEP with an updated GLEP or status quo?
>
> http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/glep/glep-0027.html
See also:
http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cg
On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 04:35:36PM -0400, Doug Goldstein wrote:
> How does everyone feel about the proposed layout and syntaxes of GLEP 27?
> Do we want to revisit this GLEP with an updated GLEP or status quo?
> http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/glep/glep-0027.html
I'm strongly in favour of moving forw
