Doug Goldstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted [EMAIL PROTECTED],
excerpted below, on Thu, 10 Apr 2008 16:35:36 -0400:
> How does everyone feel about the proposed layout and syntaxes of GLEP
> 27?
>
> Do we want to revisit this GLEP with an updated GLEP or status quo?
>
> http://www.gentoo.org/proj/
On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 01:41:09AM +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> On Thu, 10 Apr 2008 17:37:31 -0700
> "Robin H. Johnson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > That's why I setup them up with the ability to rsync it, and they
> > never got back to me on that, nor used it ever.
> Hrm, curious. They seem i
On Thu, 10 Apr 2008 17:37:31 -0700
"Robin H. Johnson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> That's why I setup them up with the ability to rsync it, and they
> never got back to me on that, nor used it ever.
Hrm, curious. They seem interested and alive currently. Perhaps it's
worth another shot...
--
Cia
On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 01:28:43AM +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> On Thu, 10 Apr 2008 17:21:20 -0700
> "Robin H. Johnson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Having OhLoh would be nice, but over the course of the last year,
> > they've found that their system is not really capable of handling the
> > s
On Thu, 10 Apr 2008 17:21:20 -0700
"Robin H. Johnson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Having OhLoh would be nice, but over the course of the last year,
> they've found that their system is not really capable of handling the
> scope of the gentoo-x86 CVS tree.
As I understand it, they need a full hist
On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 04:50:52PM -0700, Donnie Berkholz wrote:
> Ways to track commit stats of various sorts came up, such as cia.vc
> and ohloh. cia seems to have too much downtime to rely on. ciaranm
> talked with ohloh people already. ohloh would require some
> modif
Hi all,
Here is the summary from today's council meeting. The complete log will
show up at http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/council/ shortly.
Thanks,
Donnie
Quick summary
=
GLEP 46 (Allow upstream tags in metadata.xml): Approved
Slacker arches: Vapier's proposal is going out tonight.
Mike Frysinger wrote:
there is no compile time problem. it's all runtime. i still think carrying
the patch until gcc-4.3 goes stable is OK.
1400_prevent-gcc43-optimization-udivdi3.patch fixes compilation issue,
another patch (already in some 2.6.24.x, I guess) fixes direction flag
(that wel
How does everyone feel about the proposed layout and syntaxes of GLEP 27?
Do we want to revisit this GLEP with an updated GLEP or status quo?
http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/glep/glep-0027.html
--
gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
On Thursday 10 April 2008, José Luis Rivero (yoswink) wrote:
> Mike Frysinger escribió:
> > glibc-2.7 has sat in ~arch for much longer than i would have liked. the
> > only real issue holding it back is nscd.
>
> In alpha we still have a bastard called 205099[1]. We need to track down
> the real p
On Thursday 10 April 2008, Duncan wrote:
> Mike Frysinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted:
> > then move on to the gcc 4.3 tracker bug (#198121). once this gets below
> > a certain critical mass (i wont know what the critical mass is until
> > it's been de-attained), then we'll be ~arching things. peo
On Thursday 10 April 2008, Jan Kundrát wrote:
> Donnie Berkholz wrote:
> > Presuming you're adding the direction-flag patch to 4.3.0 so it doesn't
> > break people on a kernel earlier than 2.6.25?
>
> gentoo-sources-2.6.24-r4 has that patch, at least when looking at the
> changelog. Or is it just f
Santiago M. Mola wrote:
The GLEP should be updated. "Motivation" section does not seem to
justify the changes. IMO Meatoo [1] (and its hipothetical rewrite
using Doapspace [2]) would be the right tool to detect version bumps.
Maybe metadata.xml should contain a Freshmeat or DOAP entry so meato
I win, as always *g*
--
gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
Mike Frysinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted
[EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on Thu, 10 Apr
2008 02:57:11 -0400:
> then move on to the gcc 4.3 tracker bug (#198121). once this gets below
> a certain critical mass (i wont know what the critical mass is until
> it's been de-attained), then we'll
Hey Mike:
Mike Frysinger escribió:
some heads up here
glibc-2.7 has sat in ~arch for much longer than i would have liked. the only
real issue holding it back is nscd.
In alpha we still have a bastard called 205099[1]. We need to track down
the real problem there and fix it before we can m
On Thu, 10 Apr 2008 03:02:17 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> some heads up here
>
> glibc-2.7 has sat in ~arch for much longer than i would have liked. the
> only real issue holding it back is nscd. i never use this thing myself,
> but on some arches (like ppc), it's known to eat your cpu like a
Donnie Berkholz wrote:
Presuming you're adding the direction-flag patch to 4.3.0 so it doesn't
break people on a kernel earlier than 2.6.25?
gentoo-sources-2.6.24-r4 has that patch, at least when looking at the
changelog. Or is it just for compile-time borkage and not for the
direction flag c
On Thursday 10 April 2008, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> Also, you'll have to provide a URL to said change. i havent seen a
> patch for it in my random driftings on the interweb.
> -mike
I was just researching the issue, so had this handy:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2008-03/msg00417.html
--
/PA
On Thursday 10 April 2008, Donnie Berkholz wrote:
> On 02:57 Thu 10 Apr , Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > gcc-4.3 seems to be standing up well. since the major
> > gcc-ebuild-specific issues seem to be resolved now, i'll probably do a
> > sweep of bugs to see if there's any patches i'm missing (if y
Ciaran McCreesh a écrit :
The following things access VDB by hand:
* gnome2-utils.eclass. Will be fixed once a portage with proper
env saving goes stable, which isn't too far off. Bug 155993.
Quick follow-up on that for everyone.
The eclass has been modified not to access VDB anymore yet with
On 03:03 Wed 09 Apr , Mike Frysinger wrote:
> This is your one-day friendly reminder ! The monthly Gentoo Council
> meeting is tomorrow in #gentoo-council on irc.freenode.net. See the
> channel topic for the exact time (but it's probably 2000 UTC).
>
> If you're supposed to show up, please s
On 02:57 Thu 10 Apr , Mike Frysinger wrote:
> gcc-4.3 seems to be standing up well. since the major gcc-ebuild-specific
> issues seem to be resolved now, i'll probably do a sweep of bugs to see if
> there's any patches i'm missing (if you guys know of a bug that should be
> addressed specif
some heads up here
glibc-2.7 has sat in ~arch for much longer than i would have liked. the only
real issue holding it back is nscd. i never use this thing myself, but on
some arches (like ppc), it's known to eat your cpu like a dirty C-globbler
(where C is short for CPU). on other arches, it
24 matches
Mail list logo
