i dont plan on suggesting any gcc-4.2 version for stable. arches of course
are free to determine if gcc-4.2 works better for them than gcc-4.1 and thus
move to stable.
gcc-4.3 seems to be standing up well. since the major gcc-ebuild-specific
issues seem to be resolved now, i'll probably do a
On 09-04-2008 10:15:26 -0700, Chris Gianelloni wrote:
> Please remember to sync gentoo-x86/profiles before doing any further
> commits. The new profiles need as much checking as possible. There
> have been several commits made by people who have masked things and such
> but forgot the new profile
Please remember to sync gentoo-x86/profiles before doing any further
commits. The new profiles need as much checking as possible. There
have been several commits made by people who have masked things and such
but forgot the new profiles. Also, if you make changes to any of the
new profiles, plea
Hi,
Our in-portage courier ebuilds are pretty much outdated and assigned to
maintainer-needed.
A friend of mine, Bernd Wurst, has created a couple of up-to-date ebuilds and
maintains them. I'm thinking about proxy-maintaining them and would like to
commit them soon. Though they are pretty much
This is your one-day friendly reminder ! The monthly Gentoo Council
meeting is tomorrow in #gentoo-council on irc.freenode.net. See the
channel topic for the exact time (but it's probably 2000 UTC).
If you're supposed to show up, please show up. If you're not supposed
to show up, then show up a
