On Mon, 2008-03-10 at 23:13 +0200, Petteri Räty wrote:
> I've been the admin of the Alpha Arch Team's main dev machine since it
> was donated (mid-May 2007). Also, I run rsync5.de.g.o and have been
> doing so since about mid-2002."
Finally! Another Release Engineer to do my bidding!
Welcome to
Alec Warner wrote:
On 3/10/08, Ryan Hill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Jeroen Roovers wrote:
> On Mon, 10 Mar 2008 16:26:19 +0100
> "Wulf C. Krueger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> No, we didn't because the whole thing is p.masked for a reason. It,
>> KDE 4.0.1, is broken crap that should not
Ferris McCormick wrote:
>
> Um, not really --- this is too broad. Some packages are not keyworded
> because no one has ever tried them. We occasionally get keyword
> requests of the form "Please add ~sparc keyword to because I've
> been using it and it works fine" in response to which we do
(Probably off topic? I think Richard said something he didn't intend.)
On Tue, 2008-03-11 at 11:24 -0400, Richard Freeman wrote:
> Alec Warner wrote:
> > On 3/10/08, Ryan Hill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> You're still not getting this. The KDE team did not _want_ these ebuilds
> >> keyworded
Am Montag, den 10.03.2008, 23:02 +0100 schrieb Lars Weiler:
> * Petteri Räty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [08/03/10 23:13 +0200]:
> > One of those people working on those weird paper weights. This time our
> > monkey comes from the world of alphas. Tobias hails from Germany (there
> > seems to be no end).
Congratulations Tobias. You're a worthy addition to Gentoo. And a lot
of thanks to Petteri who's taking over my work while I'm stranded.
Denis.
--
gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
Bo Ørsted Andresen wrote:
On Tuesday 11 March 2008 16:55:11 Ferris McCormick wrote:
Now that I've said I'm tired of this thread, let me add to it. I'd like
to add one more point, namely:
* Please explain in the ChangeLog what you are doing and why. In
this case, if I look at kdelibs fo
Alec Warner wrote:
> On 3/10/08, Ryan Hill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> You're still not getting this. The KDE team did not _want_ these ebuilds
>> keyworded. That's why they _weren't_ keyworded. That's why there was no
>> bug
>> filed, saying "hey we dropped these keywords" because they _di
On 3/10/08, Ryan Hill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Jeroen Roovers wrote:
> > On Mon, 10 Mar 2008 16:26:19 +0100
> > "Wulf C. Krueger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >> No, we didn't because the whole thing is p.masked for a reason. It,
> >> KDE 4.0.1, is broken crap that should not yet be re
В Втр, 11/03/2008 в 06:36 +0100, Jeroen Roovers пишет:
> On Mon, 10 Mar 2008 23:04:54 -0600
> Ryan Hill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Just like when you add a new ebuild, you add it with the keywords for
> > architectures you personally have verified to work.
>
> It seems you're confusing pack
10 matches
Mail list logo
