On Thu, 2008-02-21 at 16:27 +1100, Andrew Cowie wrote:
> On Wed, 2008-02-20 at 19:42 -0600, Ryan Hill wrote:
> > But I agree, rekeywording amd64 to x86_64 would probably be more work than
> > it's
> > worth.
>
> Can we not just hardwire an alias into the emerge codebase?
>
> I must admit, from
On Wed, 2008-02-20 at 19:42 -0600, Ryan Hill wrote:
> But I agree, rekeywording amd64 to x86_64 would probably be more work than
> it's
> worth.
Can we not just hardwire an alias into the emerge codebase?
I must admit, from a purely optical standpoint, the idea of saying my
system is "amd64" wh
On 04:07 Thu 21 Feb , Rajiv Aaron Manglani (rajiv) wrote:
> 1.1 net-misc/asterisk-addons/asterisk-addons-1.2.8.ebuild
>
> file :
> http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/gentoo-x86/net-misc/asterisk-addons/asterisk-addons-1.2.8.ebuild?rev=1.1&view=markup
> plain:
> http://sour
Christoph Mende wrote:
On Wed, 20 Feb 2008 12:59:11 -0500
"William L. Thomson Jr." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Unless the work to do that is greater than the value of the change.
It most likely is. And beside of that: amd64 is the technically correct
term. :p
*sigh* I know I'm going to regret
On Wed, 20 Feb 2008 12:59:11 -0500
"William L. Thomson Jr." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Unless the work to do that is greater than the value of the change.
It most likely is. And beside of that: amd64 is the technically correct
term. :p
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Hi gentooists,
I've been reading news sites about some changes happening in Gentoo
and I thought it might be a good time to submit some ideas I've been
baking for several years.
I come from a Linux From Scratch background, I like the feeling of
knowing every single corner of my system and the fac
On 20-02-2008 19:23:26 +0100, Marius Mauch wrote:
> On Wed, 20 Feb 2008 12:59:11 -0500
> "William L. Thomson Jr." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Please excuse my ignorance if this is a naive comment or has been
> > brought up before. With all the non amd processors now with 64bit
> > support. am
On Wed, 20 Feb 2008 12:59:11 -0500
"William L. Thomson Jr." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Please excuse my ignorance if this is a naive comment or has been
> brought up before. With all the non amd processors now with 64bit
> support. amd64 as a keyword seems a bit odd and off maybe.
>
> What's th
William L. Thomson Jr. a écrit :
Please excuse my ignorance if this is a naive comment or has been
brought up before. With all the non amd processors now with 64bit
support. amd64 as a keyword seems a bit odd and off maybe.
I think we'd already discussed this a while back, and decided not to
c
Please excuse my ignorance if this is a naive comment or has been
brought up before. With all the non amd processors now with 64bit
support. amd64 as a keyword seems a bit odd and off maybe.
What's the possibility of switching amd64 to x86_64?
Unless the work to do that is greater than the value
Doug Klima wrote:
Doug Klima wrote:
Doug Klima wrote:
Doug Klima wrote:
Bo Ørsted Andresen wrote:
For quite a while the KDE herd has had a modified version of
subversion.eclass in the kde overlay. During that time we have
added the following features to the eclass which we would like to
put
Doug Klima wrote:
Doug Klima wrote:
Doug Klima wrote:
Bo Ørsted Andresen wrote:
For quite a while the KDE herd has had a modified version of
subversion.eclass in the kde overlay. During that time we have
added the following features to the eclass which we would like to
put back in gentoo-x86
Doug Klima wrote:
Doug Klima wrote:
Bo Ørsted Andresen wrote:
For quite a while the KDE herd has had a modified version of
subversion.eclass in the kde overlay. During that time we have added
the following features to the eclass which we would like to put back
in gentoo-x86 soon. Since the ch
13 matches
Mail list logo
