Re: [gentoo-dev] Updated GLEP 46: Allow upstream tags in metadata.xml

2008-01-21 Thread Ciaran McCreesh
On Mon, 21 Jan 2008 10:07:00 +0100 Tiziano Müller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I updated GLEP46 based on the the discussion before. > You can find it at http://dev.gentoo.org/~dev-zero/glep-0046.txt Freshmeat IDs are a string, not a number. -- Ciaran McCreesh signature.asc Description: PGP sig

[gentoo-dev] [EMAIL PROTECTED] exists

2008-01-21 Thread Torsten Veller
* Mike Frysinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On Monday 21 January 2008, Thomas Kahle wrote: > > i'm not sure if this is the right place for my question, if not, please > > tell me the right one. > > i dont think there's a mailing list for this stuff, but there is an irc > channel (#gentoo-dev-help iir

[gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in mail-filter/qmail-scanner: ChangeLog qmail-scanner-2.02.ebuild

2008-01-21 Thread Donnie Berkholz
On 07:29 Tue 22 Jan , Alfredo Tupone (tupone) wrote: > 1.1 mail-filter/qmail-scanner/qmail-scanner-2.02.ebuild > > file : > http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/gentoo-x86/mail-filter/qmail-scanner/qmail-scanner-2.02.ebuild?rev=1.1&view=markup > plain: > http://sources.gento

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Concerns about WIPE_TMP change [offtopic]

2008-01-21 Thread Philip Webb
080121 Caleb Cushing wrote: > last time I checked open office only required ~2GB to compile OO 2.3.1 needed 3,25 GB here, which was less than in the past IIRC. You're correct that that is far more than any other pkg needs. -- ,,==

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Concerns about WIPE_TMP change [offtopic]

2008-01-21 Thread Caleb Cushing
On Jan 20, 2008 8:43 AM, Richard Freeman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Stefan de Konink wrote: > > ..very offtopic but how are you all compiling stuff like firefox on a > > ram disk. Or is 8GB of ram very cheap suddenly? > not to mention, last time I checked open office only required ~2GB of space

[gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in dev-util/eclipse-sdk: eclipse-sdk-3.2.1-r2.ebuild ChangeLog eclipse-sdk-3.3.1.1.ebuild

2008-01-21 Thread Ryan Hill
Donnie Berkholz wrote: On 12:15 Mon 21 Jan , Jean-Noel Rivasseau (elvanor) wrote: 1.1 dev-util/eclipse-sdk/eclipse-sdk-3.3.1.1.ebuild file : http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/gentoo-x86/dev-util/eclipse-sdk/eclipse-sdk-3.3.1.1.ebuild?rev=1.1&view=markup plain: http://s

Re: [gentoo-dev] Ebuild Writing

2008-01-21 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Monday 21 January 2008, Thomas Kahle wrote: > i'm not sure if this is the right place for my question, if not, please > tell me the right one. i dont think there's a mailing list for this stuff, but there is an irc channel (#gentoo-dev-help iirc) > I'm trying to write an ebuild for a math sof

[gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in dev-util/qmtest: qmtest-2.3.ebuild ChangeLog qmtest-2.4.ebuild

2008-01-21 Thread Donnie Berkholz
On 19:54 Mon 21 Jan , Joel D. Martin (kanaka) wrote: > 1.1 dev-util/qmtest/qmtest-2.4.ebuild > > file : > http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/gentoo-x86/dev-util/qmtest/qmtest-2.4.ebuild?rev=1.1&view=markup > plain: > http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/gentoo-x86/dev-util

[gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in dev-util/eclipse-sdk: eclipse-sdk-3.2.1-r2.ebuild ChangeLog eclipse-sdk-3.3.1.1.ebuild

2008-01-21 Thread Donnie Berkholz
On 12:15 Mon 21 Jan , Jean-Noel Rivasseau (elvanor) wrote: > 1.1 dev-util/eclipse-sdk/eclipse-sdk-3.3.1.1.ebuild > > file : > http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/gentoo-x86/dev-util/eclipse-sdk/eclipse-sdk-3.3.1.1.ebuild?rev=1.1&view=markup > plain: > http://sources.gentoo.

[gentoo-dev] Light changes in Ada handling in Gentoo

2008-01-21 Thread George Shapovalov
Dear Ada users. I have finally implemented the multiple gnat handling in full, resolving bug #151343. The operational procedures on user side remain largerly the same (as for the last year), however there is one modification everybody using Ada compilers in Gentoo should be aware of. Now (as w

[gentoo-dev] Re: Concerns about WIPE_TMP change

2008-01-21 Thread Duncan
Mike Frysinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted [EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on Mon, 21 Jan 2008 00:05:29 -0500: > another point: i dont think ive ever met anyone who even knew what the > Windows temp directory was or even how to find it. no one relies on > that directory to manage their files.

[gentoo-dev] Re: Updated GLEP 46: Allow upstream tags in metadata.xml

2008-01-21 Thread Duncan
"Alec Warner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted [EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on Mon, 21 Jan 2008 08:35:49 -0800: > See attached Diff. One more minor change, English parsing (- be): Backwards Compatibility === No changes are necessary to existing ``metadata.xml`` files. Info

[gentoo-dev] Ebuild Writing

2008-01-21 Thread Thomas Kahle
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi all, i'm not sure if this is the right place for my question, if not, please tell me the right one. I'm trying to write an ebuild for a math software called polymake. It uses a non-autotools, makefile and perl based configuration mechanism. This t

[gentoo-dev] Adding a new license, CCPL-Attribution-NoDerivs-2.5

2008-01-21 Thread Samuli Suominen
Almost same as CCPL-Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs-2.5 we already have.. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/2.5/legalcode required for http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=144237 heads up. -drac -- gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] Upcoming Infra maintenance/downtimes: anon{cvs,svn,git}, archives, bouncer, overlays

2008-01-21 Thread Michael Haubenwallner
On Sat, 2008-01-19 at 00:26 +0200, Alon Bar-Lev wrote: > On 1/18/08, Mike Frysinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Thursday 17 January 2008, Robin H. Johnson wrote: > > > anonvcs.gentoo.org: anoncvs, anonsvn, anongit > > > - Anonymous SVN is changing from http:// to svn:// [1] > > > overlays.gen

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs

2008-01-21 Thread Michael Haubenwallner
On Tue, 2007-12-25 at 18:19 +, Christian Heim wrote: > As usual you are free to pick them up, if you'd like to maintain them... > - app-admin/chrpath Late, but I should be able to take this one.. /haubi/ -- Michael Haubenwallner Gentoo on a different level -- gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org

Re: [gentoo-dev] Updated GLEP 46: Allow upstream tags in metadata.xml

2008-01-21 Thread Alec Warner
On 1/21/08, Alec Warner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 1/21/08, Tiziano Müller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi again > > > > I updated GLEP46 based on the the discussion before. > > You can find it at http://dev.gentoo.org/~dev-zero/glep-0046.txt > > > > Summary of the changes: > > - Added addi

Re: [gentoo-dev] Updated GLEP 46: Allow upstream tags in metadata.xml

2008-01-21 Thread Alec Warner
On 1/21/08, Tiziano Müller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi again > > I updated GLEP46 based on the the discussion before. > You can find it at http://dev.gentoo.org/~dev-zero/glep-0046.txt > > Summary of the changes: > - Added additional "helps treecleaner" motivation > - Added new element along

Re: [gentoo-dev] Upcoming Infra maintenance/downtimes: anon{cvs,svn,git}, archives, bouncer, overlays

2008-01-21 Thread Robin H. Johnson
On Sun, Jan 20, 2008 at 07:56:12AM -0500, Thomas Anderson wrote: > On Thursday 17 January 2008 16:47:28 Robin H. Johnson wrote: > > Hi folks, > > > > Infra is working on a bunch of things lately, and there are going to be > > changes or brief outages for the following services (this is pretty much

[gentoo-dev] Updated GLEP 46: Allow upstream tags in metadata.xml

2008-01-21 Thread Tiziano Müller
Hi again I updated GLEP46 based on the the discussion before. You can find it at http://dev.gentoo.org/~dev-zero/glep-0046.txt Summary of the changes: - Added additional "helps treecleaner" motivation - Added new element along with a precise specification of what is allowed (please remember th