Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> You can't sensibly have backwards compatibility across new deps if all
> the requested options are implemented anyway -- there's no exact
> mapping between the current three vars and all the new ones. New deps
> has to be an EAPI change, and it has to be an ebuild change.
# David Shakaryan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (30 Dec 2007)
# Masked pending removal 30 Jan 2008.
# Extremely old themes not exhibiting Openbox's newer theming options.
# Openbox will be moving to an XML-based theming engine in the future.
x11-themes/openbox-themes
--
David Shakaryan
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sat, 2007-12-29 at 23:20 +, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> On Sun, 30 Dec 2007 00:16:22 +0100
> Federico Ferri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > sorry if this has already suggested.
>
> It has. It solves nothing.
>
If it solves nothing you should at least post a link to the post you
made explaini
* Doug Klima <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-12-26 19:19]:
> Howdy all,
Hey Doug!
> As some people might have noticed, I've wanted to bring Asterisk 1.4 to
> the tree proper.
++ on that from me :)
> The big holdup is the zaptel ebuild, which needs to be
> revamped and brought in as well for the 1.4.x
Stefan Hellermann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted
[EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on Sat, 29 Dec 2007
21:45:45 +0100:
> why has sys-apps/diffutils a dependency on >=sys-apps/man-pages-2.46?
>
> I'm using a embedded uclibc system
There are people here who work with embedded and ulibc. I'm not on
On Sun, 30 Dec 2007 00:16:22 +0100
Federico Ferri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> sorry if this has already suggested.
It has. It solves nothing.
--
Ciaran McCreesh
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Ciaran McCreesh ha scritto:
> On Thu, 27 Dec 2007 18:03:27 +
> Roy Marples <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Using your analogy you should then recognise that there is a strong
>> dislike for pink and should seek a new colour that allows the building
>> of said extensions.
>>
>
> And what
On Sat, 29 Dec 2007 22:47:50 +0100
Luca Barbato <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Have a look at the labels bug (201499).
>
> Similar idea, but I don't like the labels that much,
>
> having separate vars can make backward compatibility easy
You can't sensibly have backwards compatibility across new
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> On Sat, 29 Dec 2007 22:12:11 +0100
> Luca Barbato <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Some items I have in wishlist
>>
>> - LRDEPEND link runtime dep (I need to link against that in order to
>> run)
>> - BDEPEND build dep (I need those tools in order to build)
>>
>> - arch/ctarge
On Sat, 29 Dec 2007 22:12:11 +0100
Luca Barbato <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Some items I have in wishlist
>
> - LRDEPEND link runtime dep (I need to link against that in order to
> run)
> - BDEPEND build dep (I need those tools in order to build)
>
> - arch/ctarget support in deps (same way you
Some items I have in wishlist
- LRDEPEND link runtime dep (I need to link against that in order to run)
- BDEPEND build dep (I need those tools in order to build)
- arch/ctarget support in deps (same way you have use deps)
- explicit ctarget support in the package manager emerge --cross=target
s
Hello,
why has sys-apps/diffutils a dependency on >=sys-apps/man-pages-2.46?
I'm using a embedded uclibc system, and in uclibc man, man-pages and groff are removed
from the system target to not require c++. But diffutils depends on man-pages for no
obvious reason, and pulls in man and groff wi
On Sat, 29 Dec 2007 09:48:33 +
Steve Long <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The package manager knows the value; so does bash. Why on earth does,
> say, make need to know it?
Don't think 'make'. Think 'emake'.
--
Ciaran McCreesh
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> On Fri, 28 Dec 2007 05:21:06 +
> Steve Long <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Whatever. EAPI="2" works fine with current software. Could you tell
>> me why you're so hot on export'ing EAPI? I thought it was only
>> relevant, environment-wise, to the ebuild and subshells. W
14 matches
Mail list logo
