On Sun, 2007-11-25 at 16:31 +0100, Sven Vermeulen wrote:
> It seems like Gentoo is
> undergoing a generation switch - many of the elderly are taking on
> less responsibilities (or even retire) to give place to the energetic
> new developers ;-)
Yay for kids! :D
Bai bai seemant :( I don't think I e
Wolfram Schlich schrieb:
> * Hanno Böck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-11-26 15:39]:
>> [...]
>> So I'd like to unmask it soon. Please, if you're using mailman test it, tell
>> me if it suits your needs or just give me feedback like "worksforme", I
>> actually don't have a clue how many people really
* Wolfram Schlich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-11-27 02:31]:
> * Wolfram Schlich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-11-27 02:24]:
> > * Hanno Böck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-11-26 15:39]:
> > > [...]
> > > So I'd like to unmask it soon. Please, if you're using mailman test it,
> > > tell
> > > me if it suits
* Wolfram Schlich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-11-27 02:24]:
> * Hanno Böck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-11-26 15:39]:
> > [...]
> > So I'd like to unmask it soon. Please, if you're using mailman test it,
> > tell
> > me if it suits your needs or just give me feedback like "worksforme", I
> > actually
* Hanno Böck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-11-26 15:39]:
> [...]
> So I'd like to unmask it soon. Please, if you're using mailman test it, tell
> me if it suits your needs or just give me feedback like "worksforme", I
> actually don't have a clue how many people really use this ebuild.
I get this us
* Hanno Böck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-11-26 15:39]:
> [...]
> So I'd like to unmask it soon. Please, if you're using mailman test it, tell
> me if it suits your needs or just give me feedback like "worksforme", I
> actually don't have a clue how many people really use this ebuild.
pkg_postinst(
* Hanno Böck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-11-26 15:39]:
> Hi,
>
> The mailman ebuild was a pain in the past, installing to non-fhs-locations
> (/usr/local), doing lot's of strange stuff, not able to use etc-update...
>
> mailman-2.1.9-r2 tries to fix lot's of those issues, it's much more
> configu
K, to sum it up then, everything stays like it is atm.
Thanks for your comments :)
Greetz
-Jokey
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
[ I'm answering diego's mail here because I didn't get a copy of it
through gentoo-dev, I guess the list missed me or my spam filter killed
it ]
On Mon, Nov 26, 2007 at 07:10:40AM -0800, Alec Warner wrote:
> On 11/26/07, Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > CCing council so tha
Monday, 26. November 2007, Markus Ullmann Ви написали:
> Robin H. Johnson schrieb:
> > On Mon, Nov 26, 2007 at 10:46:12AM +0100, Markus Ullmann wrote:
> > d) In addition to c), keep them open, flagged with sunrise in the status
> >board, so that when a developer does want some package not in th
On 11/26/07, Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So. let's face it, the only people who agree on the need for a GLEP
> is Alec and Ciaran. The rest of the thread (which by the way I had
> to dig up on Gmane because I didn't really give a damn) is composed
> by Thilo who think is
On 11/26/07, Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> CCing council so that the other members can express their feeling about this;
> basically the only people I actually care about getting the feeling about
> this at all.
>
> On Monday 26 November 2007, you wrote:
> > Seems like ever
Hi,
The mailman ebuild was a pain in the past, installing to non-fhs-locations
(/usr/local), doing lot's of strange stuff, not able to use etc-update...
mailman-2.1.9-r2 tries to fix lot's of those issues, it's much more
configurable through some variables. It's currently masked, but yesterday
Robin H. Johnson schrieb:
> On Mon, Nov 26, 2007 at 10:46:12AM +0100, Markus Ullmann wrote:
> d) In addition to c), keep them open, flagged with sunrise in the status
>board, so that when a developer does want some package not in the
>tree, they can search first.
That's done already
> e)
Jose Luis Rivero wrote:
I'm not asking for an extra overhead of 'bureaucracy' (write specs,
mailling @dev, send to the council, etc.) but a bit more of communication
would be appreciated:
Seems like everyone who contact me/us about this thread is agree about
the needed of write a GLEP before
Robin H. Johnson wrote:
> d) In addition to c), keep them open, flagged with sunrise in the status
>board, so that when a developer does want some package not in the
>tree, they can search first.
> e) Encourage existing developers to review and commit this stuff more
>often.
>
> I rea
On 11/24/07, Jose Luis Rivero <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi all:
>
> I've read on the planet the recently included support to document USE
> flags in metadata. Seems like it was an idea from flameeyes and cardoe,
> discussed on the planet [1][2] and performed by -infra (bug #199788).
>
> While pl
On Mon, Nov 26, 2007 at 10:46:12AM +0100, Markus Ullmann wrote:
> As I highly doubt this will happen within a week, we have to make a
> decision how to proceed with this stuff. So what options do we have?
> These come to mind:
d) In addition to c), keep them open, flagged with sunrise in the status
On Nov 26, 2007 4:46 AM, Markus Ullmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi fellows,
>
> when taking a look at the open bug count for bugs assigned to
> maintainer-wanted (2450 at the time of writing), it seems pretty obvious
> that we really can't handle all of them, at least not without growing at
>
Hi fellows,
when taking a look at the open bug count for bugs assigned to
maintainer-wanted (2450 at the time of writing), it seems pretty obvious
that we really can't handle all of them, at least not without growing at
least two dozen devs to maintain it properly.
As I highly doubt this will hap
20 matches
Mail list logo
