Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: USE flag transition: tetex and latex

2007-11-09 Thread Robert Buchholz
Am 07.11.2007 um 14:09 schrieb Ferris McCormick: On Wed, 2007-11-07 at 09:13 +0100, Alexis Ballier wrote: Hi, Yes, we should introduce tex, latex and kpathsea USE flags. Anyone? +1 for latex & kpathsea. How/when do we start ? :) I'd say start moving useflags on a per package basis, mak

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Place of EAPI variable in ebuild

2007-11-09 Thread Ciaran McCreesh
On Sat, 10 Nov 2007 01:39:18 +0100 Carsten Lohrke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Handling depends a bit upon, if EAPI should always be downwards > compatible. It won't be. It's likely that future EAPIs will introduce new strictness requirements and remove certain legacy variables and utilities. --

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Place of EAPI variable in ebuild

2007-11-09 Thread Carsten Lohrke
On Freitag, 9. November 2007, Petteri Räty wrote: > What if I want to use EAPI=1 features in an eclass? So if we for example > we have an ebuild using EAPI=2 and then it inherits and eclass that sets > EAPI=1 for slot deps. You check which EAPI the ebuild sets, then either continue or die. Handlin

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: Place of EAPI variable in ebuild

2007-11-09 Thread Petteri Räty
Markus Ullmann kirjoitti: >> What if I want to use EAPI=1 features in an eclass? So if we for example >> we have an ebuild using EAPI=2 and then it inherits and eclass that sets >> EAPI=1 for slot deps. > > shouldn't be an issue as eapi 1 and 2 would have slot deps > though for other things like s

[gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: Place of EAPI variable in ebuild

2007-11-09 Thread Markus Ullmann
> What if I want to use EAPI=1 features in an eclass? So if we for example > we have an ebuild using EAPI=2 and then it inherits and eclass that sets > EAPI=1 for slot deps. shouldn't be an issue as eapi 1 and 2 would have slot deps though for other things like src functions defined in the eclass

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Place of EAPI variable in ebuild

2007-11-09 Thread Petteri Räty
Ciaran McCreesh kirjoitti: > On Fri, 09 Nov 2007 23:55:51 +0200 > Petteri Räty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Usually it's best that ebuild variables follow the order that is in >> skel.ebuild. So know we should decide where to place EAPI. I suggest >> we put it it after LICENSE as that's where the

[gentoo-dev] Phase invariancy and exclusivity requirements

2007-11-09 Thread Ciaran McCreesh
What specifically are the phase invariancy and exclusivity requirements for ebuilds? Currently PMS doesn't have anything to say about this; clearly it needs to, since existing ebuilds fairly obviously do have invariancy and exclusivity requirements. Note that we're only discussing package manager

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Place of EAPI variable in ebuild

2007-11-09 Thread Fabian Groffen
On 09-11-2007 23:55:51 +0200, Petteri Räty wrote: > Usually it's best that ebuild variables follow the order that is in > skel.ebuild. So know we should decide where to place EAPI. I suggest we > put it it after LICENSE as that's where the more technical stuff like > SLOT starts. Attached a patch f

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Place of EAPI variable in ebuild

2007-11-09 Thread Ciaran McCreesh
On Fri, 09 Nov 2007 23:55:51 +0200 Petteri Räty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Usually it's best that ebuild variables follow the order that is in > skel.ebuild. So know we should decide where to place EAPI. I suggest > we put it it after LICENSE as that's where the more technical stuff > like SLOT s

[gentoo-dev] RFC: Place of EAPI variable in ebuild

2007-11-09 Thread Petteri Räty
Usually it's best that ebuild variables follow the order that is in skel.ebuild. So know we should decide where to place EAPI. I suggest we put it it after LICENSE as that's where the more technical stuff like SLOT starts. Attached a patch for skel.ebuild. Regards, Petteri Index: skel.ebuild =

Re: src_fetch (was Re: [gentoo-dev] EAPI 1 (Was: Re: Monthly Gentoo Council Reminder for April))

2007-11-09 Thread Ciaran McCreesh
On Fri, 09 Nov 2007 18:41:38 +0100 "Marijn Schouten (hkBst)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Use case one: package is completely unversioned upstream. > Have src_fetch add a version as appropriate to the downloaded/mirrored > version. This will work as change of upstream sources will be > detected by

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: New eclass: cmake-utils.eclass

2007-11-09 Thread Marijn Schouten (hkBst)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Marijn Schouten (hkBst) wrote: > ý wrote: >> Wulf C. Krueger schrieb: >>> On Friday, 09. November 2007 10:10:42 Rený 'Necoro' Neumann wrote: But as I think, that the uppercase version is the common behavior here, it should not need this extra

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: New eclass: cmake-utils.eclass

2007-11-09 Thread Marijn Schouten (hkBst)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 � wrote: > Wulf C. Krueger schrieb: >> On Friday, 09. November 2007 10:10:42 Rený 'Necoro' Neumann wrote: >>> But as I think, that the uppercase version is the common behavior here, >>> it should not need this extra "PYTHON". :) That's why the patch ;)

src_fetch (was Re: [gentoo-dev] EAPI 1 (Was: Re: Monthly Gentoo Council Reminder for April))

2007-11-09 Thread Marijn Schouten (hkBst)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > On Fri, 13 Apr 2007 14:21:16 +0200 > Marius Mauch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> On Wed, 11 Apr 2007 15:41:01 +0100 >> Ciaran McCreesh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> * Phase changes: src_fetch -> src_unpack -> src_prepare -> >>

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: New eclass: cmake-utils.eclass

2007-11-09 Thread Wulf C. Krueger
On Friday, 09. November 2007 10:10:42 René 'Necoro' Neumann wrote: > But as I think, that the uppercase version is the common behavior here, > it should not need this extra "PYTHON". :) That's why the patch ;) Actually, the mixed-case is what we have encountered in most cases. Furthermore, as yo

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: New eclass: cmake-utils.eclass

2007-11-09 Thread René 'Necoro' Neumann
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Wulf C. Krueger schrieb: > On Friday, 09. November 2007 10:10:42 René 'Necoro' Neumann wrote: >> But as I think, that the uppercase version is the common behavior here, >> it should not need this extra "PYTHON". :) That's why the patch ;) > > Actually

[gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-core] packages2 testing

2007-11-09 Thread Doug Klima
Robin H. Johnson wrote: > On Thu, Nov 08, 2007 at 07:52:49PM +0100, Marijn Schouten (hkBst) wrote: > >> Isn't there supposed to be a search box too? >> > Does anybody actually read the FAQ? > > - Short packages2 TODO list > - "Search": match a given string against: a substring in pack

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in net-print/cups: ChangeLog cups-1.3.4-r1.ebuild cups-1.3.4.ebuild

2007-11-09 Thread Rémi Cardona
Ciaran McCreesh a écrit : On Fri, 9 Nov 2007 00:13:39 -0800 Donnie Berkholz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: PDEPEND=" ppds? ( || ( ( net-print/foomatic-filters-ppds net-print/foomatic-db-ppds ) net

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in net-print/cups: ChangeLog cups-1.3.4-r1.ebuild cups-1.3.4.ebuild

2007-11-09 Thread Ciaran McCreesh
On Fri, 9 Nov 2007 00:13:39 -0800 Donnie Berkholz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > PDEPEND=" > > ppds? ( || ( > > ( > > net-print/foomatic-filters-ppds > > net-print/foomatic-db-ppds > > ) > > net-print/foomatic-filters-p

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in net-print/cups: ChangeLog cups-1.3.4-r1.ebuild cups-1.3.4.ebuild

2007-11-09 Thread Petteri Räty
Donnie Berkholz kirjoitti: > On 23:15 Thu 08 Nov , Timo Gurr (tgurr) wrote: >> 1.1 net-print/cups/cups-1.3.4-r1.ebuild >> >> file : >> http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/gentoo-x86/net-print/cups/cups-1.3.4-r1.ebuild?rev=1.1&view=markup >> plain: >> http://sources.gentoo.

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: New eclass: cmake-utils.eclass

2007-11-09 Thread René 'Necoro' Neumann
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Ingmar Vanhassel schrieb: > 2007/11/9, René 'Necoro' Neumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >> Steve Long schrieb: >>> René 'Necoro' Neumann wrote: cmake-utils_src_enable python => -DENABLE_python=... Wanted would be that it returned -DENABLE_PYTH

[gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in sys-process/fcron: ChangeLog fcron-3.0.4.ebuild

2007-11-09 Thread Donnie Berkholz
On 08:54 Fri 09 Nov , Wolfram Schlich (wschlich) wrote: > 1.1 sys-process/fcron/fcron-3.0.4.ebuild > > file : > http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/gentoo-x86/sys-process/fcron/fcron-3.0.4.ebuild?rev=1.1&view=markup > plain: > http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/gentoo-x86

[gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in net-print/cups: ChangeLog cups-1.3.4-r1.ebuild cups-1.3.4.ebuild

2007-11-09 Thread Donnie Berkholz
On 23:15 Thu 08 Nov , Timo Gurr (tgurr) wrote: > 1.1 net-print/cups/cups-1.3.4-r1.ebuild > > file : > http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/gentoo-x86/net-print/cups/cups-1.3.4-r1.ebuild?rev=1.1&view=markup > plain: > http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/gentoo-x86/net-print/

[gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in net-mail/getmail: ChangeLog getmail-4.7.7.ebuild

2007-11-09 Thread Donnie Berkholz
On 18:12 Thu 08 Nov , Andrej Kacian (ticho) wrote: > 1.1 net-mail/getmail/getmail-4.7.7.ebuild > > file : > http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/gentoo-x86/net-mail/getmail/getmail-4.7.7.ebuild?rev=1.1&view=markup > plain: > http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/gentoo-x86/ne