On Wednesday 31 October 2007, Donnie Berkholz wrote:
> On 15:38 Wed 31 Oct , Raul Porcel (armin76) wrote:
> > 1.1 net-p2p/deluge/deluge-0.5.6.2.ebuild
> >
> > file :
> > http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/gentoo-x86/net-p2p/deluge/deluge-0.5
> >.6.2.ebuild?rev=1.1&view=markup
On 19:49 Wed 31 Oct , Bernard Cafarelli (voyageur) wrote:
> 1.1 net-misc/nxserver-freenx/nxserver-freenx-0.7.1.ebuild
>
> file :
> http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/gentoo-x86/net-misc/nxserver-freenx/nxserver-freenx-0.7.1.ebuild?rev=1.1&view=markup
> plain:
> http://sour
On 19:25 Wed 31 Oct , Marijn Schouten (hkBst) wrote:
> Donnie Berkholz wrote:
> > If you moved the filter-ldflags() call up to pkg_setup(), you could drop
> > src_compile() altogether to clean up the ebuild a little.
>
> Wouldn't that make binary packages cry?
Binary packages don't do any li
Marijn Schouten (hkBst) wrote:
> Donnie Berkholz wrote:
>> If you moved the filter-ldflags() call up to pkg_setup(), you could drop
>> src_compile() altogether to clean up the ebuild a little.
>
> Wouldn't that make binary packages cry?
In theory, autotools scripts allow users to set env variabl
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Donnie Berkholz wrote:
> On 15:38 Wed 31 Oct , Raul Porcel (armin76) wrote:
>> 1.1 net-p2p/deluge/deluge-0.5.6.2.ebuild
>>
>> file :
>> http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/gentoo-x86/net-p2p/deluge/deluge-0.5.6.2.ebuild?rev=1.1&v
On 15:38 Wed 31 Oct , Raul Porcel (armin76) wrote:
> 1.1 net-p2p/deluge/deluge-0.5.6.2.ebuild
>
> file :
> http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/gentoo-x86/net-p2p/deluge/deluge-0.5.6.2.ebuild?rev=1.1&view=markup
> plain:
> http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/gentoo-x86/net-
Roy Marples a écrit :
Begs the question why does HAL use libpci in the first place.
2 reasons (that I know of) :
1) to make things pretty in lshal
2) to make writing FDI files somewhat less cryptic
http://gitweb.freedesktop.org/?p=hal.git;a=blob;f=hald/linux/device.c#l1554
Rémi
--
[EMAIL PRO
Daniel Drake wrote:
> OK, so having a dynamic libpci is an outstanding requirement for the
> patch. I will follow up with pciutils upstream about the current state
> of that.
If you had any issues with Martin Mares, I can talk to him as he's my
teacher in one course at the university. He looks lik
Doug Goldstein wrote:
When HAL evaluated the usage of libpci the following issues were
identified:
1) increased memory usage, to the point that HAL was not usable on the
OLPC project
I was only ever aware of concerns that memory usage might be high, but
wasn't aware it caused specific proble
On Wed, 2007-10-31 at 11:40 -0400, Doug Goldstein wrote:
> When HAL evaluated the usage of libpci the following issues were
> identified:
> 1) increased memory usage, to the point that HAL was not usable on the
> OLPC project
> 2) ABI breakage between patch revisions (i.e. x.y.z and x.y.z+1 wer
Daniel Drake wrote:
> Robin H. Johnson wrote:
>> Heya,
>>
>> So now this is not a flamewar.
>>
>> Jakub was originally going to complain at me for the upstream usbutils
>> adding support for gzipped usb.ids files, but a group of us (myself,
>> dsd, jakub, leio, steev) had a discussion about it, and
Wulf C. Krueger wrote:
The question is not if some software is doing the right thing or not but
if our packages behave like they should for our users.
There is also value in satisfying and not deviating away from upstream,
as well as respecting values of upstream decisions (such as offering
c
Hello Daniel!
I don't feel strongly enough to make an objection to your commit,
but I think pciutils is doing the right thing,
The question is not if some software is doing the right thing or not
but if our packages behave like they should for our users.
and despite me and Mike putting a
Daniel Drake wrote:
+ if [[ ! -e "${ROOT}"/usr/share/misc/pci.ids ]]; then
+ myconf="--disable-pci-ids"
- don't use ${ROOT} outside of pkg_*
- en/disabling functionality based on existence of files is kinda
gross, especially when based on what exists on the compiling system
Guilherme Amadio wrote:
> And sorry to a bit off this thread, but I also would like to help with
> some translations of official docs and development. I've been using Gentoo
> since 1.4, but never really had time to help. Now I feel I'll have more
> time and, if you can point me to some Brazili
Hi guys,
I totally agree with the patch sent by Daniel in the previous message.
I think it clarifies to the user (me, for example), why it's not possible
to build pciutils with the zlib USE flag. This is just my humble opinion,
though, as a user.
And sorry to a bit off this thread, but I a
Robin H. Johnson wrote:
Heya,
So now this is not a flamewar.
Jakub was originally going to complain at me for the upstream usbutils
adding support for gzipped usb.ids files, but a group of us (myself,
dsd, jakub, leio, steev) had a discussion about it, and came up with a
solution that both ends
Hi,
> What are we going to do with the global tetex USE flag?
> app-text/tetex is deprecated in favour of TeXLive which is still hard
> masked but will be the default TeX distribution in the future.
> Rename it to tex as TeXLive is based on teTeX? And what about
> USE=latex? Use a generic tex for
18 matches
Mail list logo
