Greetings everybody!
As welp is still unavailable, it's my pleasure to tell you all *It's a
Bugday!* As always join #gentoo-bugs on irc.freenode.net to participate
in all the fun bugfixing :)
Regards,
--
,-.
| Dawid Węgliński |
| [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Freitag, 31. August 2007, Tobias Klausmann wrote:
> Hi!
>
> On Fri, 31 Aug 2007, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > On Friday 31 August 2007, Marius Mauch wrote:
> >> Petteri Räty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>> Matthias Schwarzott kirjoitti:
> On Freitag, 31. August 2007, Matthias Schwarzott wrote
On Fri, 2007-08-31 at 18:13 +0200, Tobias Klausmann wrote:
> I find the persisten-net-generator.rules particularly annoying
> (for various reasons including, but not limited to system images
> and system cloning).
>
> So I have an empty file of that name and happily nuke whatever
> comes along wi
Olivier Crête <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > Great. Thanks...so what is common practice? Should the ebuild
> > die, telling people a feature will not be included or just exclude
> > it with an ewarn only?
> With bindist, you should just disable any non-distributable feature
> and print a ewarn.. Diei
On Fri, 2007-31-08 at 16:31 +0200, Christian Faulhammer wrote:
> Alexis Ballier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> > > While we are not distributing binaries, I could easily add a
> > > USE flag to enable it; the user compiles it himself, so it is all
> > > fine. But now regard the existence of binary host
Christian Faulhammer wrote:
> Alexis Ballier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
>> > While we are not distributing binaries, I could easily add a
>> > USE flag to enable it; the user compiles it himself, so it is all
>> > fine. But now regard the existence of binary hosts, are they
>> > distributions of the
Hi!
On Fri, 31 Aug 2007, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Friday 31 August 2007, Marius Mauch wrote:
>> Petteri Räty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> Matthias Schwarzott kirjoitti:
On Freitag, 31. August 2007, Matthias Schwarzott wrote:
> What do you think about adding /etc/udev/rules.d/ to
On Thu, 30 Aug 2007 19:46:39 +0200
Alexis Ballier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > video:
> > - media-video/qc-usb (liquidx)
>
> wouldn't tv be better suited here ?
Only if you point your qc-usb at your tv. :)
Kind regards,
JeR
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
Alexis Ballier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > While we are not distributing binaries, I could easily add a
> > USE flag to enable it; the user compiles it himself, so it is all
> > fine. But now regard the existence of binary hosts, are they
> > distributions of then illegal binaries?
> isn't bindist u
On Friday 31 August 2007, Marius Mauch wrote:
> Petteri Räty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Matthias Schwarzott kirjoitti:
> > > On Freitag, 31. August 2007, Matthias Schwarzott wrote:
> > >> Hi there!
> > >>
> > >> What do you think about adding /etc/udev/rules.d/ to
> > >> CONFIG_PROTECT_MASK. Th
On Fri, 31 Aug 2007 16:12:52 +0300
Petteri Räty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Matthias Schwarzott kirjoitti:
> > On Freitag, 31. August 2007, Matthias Schwarzott wrote:
> >> Hi there!
> >>
> >> What do you think about adding /etc/udev/rules.d/ to
> >> CONFIG_PROTECT_MASK. This will no longer bother
Matthias Schwarzott kirjoitti:
> On Freitag, 31. August 2007, Matthias Schwarzott wrote:
>> Hi there!
>>
>> What do you think about adding /etc/udev/rules.d/ to CONFIG_PROTECT_MASK.
>> This will no longer bother the user with updating these files.
>> Thus it will reduce the number of bugs triggered
On Freitag, 31. August 2007, Matthias Schwarzott wrote:
> Hi there!
>
> What do you think about adding /etc/udev/rules.d/ to CONFIG_PROTECT_MASK.
> This will no longer bother the user with updating these files.
> Thus it will reduce the number of bugs triggered by forgotten config-file
> updates.
>
On Freitag, 31. August 2007, Ed W wrote:
> > You will basically need to remerge sys-fs/lvm2 and sys-fs/device-mapper
> > and
>
> Darn, sorry for the noise
>
> Didn't think to check the masked packages - however, there it is clear
> as day in the changelog...
>
Well, this is not true, because neithe
You will basically need to remerge sys-fs/lvm2 and sys-fs/device-mapper and
Darn, sorry for the noise
Didn't think to check the masked packages - however, there it is clear
as day in the changelog...
Thanks
Ed W
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
On Friday 31 of August 2007 12:37:57 Matthias Schwarzott wrote:
> What do you think about adding /etc/udev/rules.d/ to CONFIG_PROTECT_MASK.
That's what I did locally so fine by me.
--
Best Regards,
Piotr Jaroszyński
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
Hi there!
What do you think about adding /etc/udev/rules.d/ to CONFIG_PROTECT_MASK.
This will no longer bother the user with updating these files.
Thus it will reduce the number of bugs triggered by forgotten config-file
updates.
If user needs home-brewn rules he is requested to add own files, a
On Friday 31 August 2007 09:18:53 Ed W wrote:
> Is it *supposed* to NOT startup automatically out of the box?
>
> Looks like there are some emails on this list about there being only
> stubs to support LVM, etc. I found some startup functions in
> "rcscripts/addons", but nothing to actually call t
Is it *supposed* to NOT startup automatically out of the box?
Looks like there are some emails on this list about there being only
stubs to support LVM, etc. I found some startup functions in
"rcscripts/addons", but nothing to actually call them at startup? There
is some stuff in conf.d/volu
Hi,
While we are not distributing binaries, I could easily add a
USE flag to enable it; the user compiles it himself, so it is all
fine. But now regard the existence of binary hosts, are they
distributions of then illegal binaries?
isn't bindist useflag made for this purpose ?
$ grep bin
20 matches
Mail list logo
