Re: [gentoo-dev] 2.4 profiles are on their way out!

Chris Gianelloni wrote: > On Mon, 2007-08-27 at 16:18 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote: >>> Let this be a lesson to everyone. Just because you discussed it a >>> couple months ago doesn't necessarily mean: >>> >>> a) it is still wanted >>> -or- >>> b) it is still valid >> so what is the 2.4 status then

Re: [gentoo-dev] 2.4 profiles are on their way out!

On E, 2007-08-27 at 17:11 -0700, Chris Gianelloni wrote: > On Mon, 2007-08-27 at 16:18 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote: > > > Let this be a lesson to everyone. Just because you discussed it a > > > couple months ago doesn't necessarily mean: > > > > > > a) it is still wanted > > > -or- > > > b) it is

Re: [gentoo-dev] 2.4 profiles are on their way out!

On Mon, 2007-08-27 at 16:18 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote: > > Let this be a lesson to everyone. Just because you discussed it a > > couple months ago doesn't necessarily mean: > > > > a) it is still wanted > > -or- > > b) it is still valid > > so what is the 2.4 status then ? Well, we still don't

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: New developer: Davide Italiano (dav_it)

Christian Faulhammer schrieb: > Petteri Räty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > >> After realizing that we has trying to log in to dev.gentoo.org with >> a wrong user name he know has access to Gentoo development boxes. He >> will be using his powers in the Artwork and GWN teams. > > That reminds me of the

[gentoo-dev] Re: New developer: Davide Italiano (dav_it)

Petteri Räty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > After realizing that we has trying to log in to dev.gentoo.org with > a wrong user name he know has access to Gentoo development boxes. He > will be using his powers in the Artwork and GWN teams. That reminds me of the cartoon with a boy pushing the door that

[gentoo-dev] Documentation for projectXML

Hi *: Some time ago there were some threads[1][2] about projectXML and the lack of documentation about how to create Gentoo project pages. Thanks to neysx, who was kind enough of reviewing my work, we have a new doc covering projectXML. More or less the structure is something like: * Creat

Re: [gentoo-dev] New developer: Davide Italiano (dav_it)

Dnia 27-08-2007, pon o godzinie 19:02 +0300, Petteri Räty napisał(a): > Here follows the usual insults and introductions of our newest addition > Davide "dav_it" Italiano. /me opens a beer Welcome! -- ,-. | Dawid Węgliński | | [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [gentoo-dev] 2.4 profiles are on their way out!

On Monday 27 August 2007, Chris Gianelloni wrote: > On Mon, 2007-08-27 at 21:21 +0200, Fernando J. Pereda wrote: > > On Mon, Aug 27, 2007 at 09:08:34PM +0200, Fernando J. Pereda wrote: > > > On Mon, Aug 27, 2007 at 11:57:48AM -0700, Chris Gianelloni wrote: > > > > As many of you may know, the Gento

Re: [gentoo-dev] 2.4 profiles are on their way out!

On Monday 27 August 2007, Chris Gianelloni wrote: > On Mon, 2007-08-27 at 21:21 +0200, Fernando J. Pereda wrote: > > On Mon, Aug 27, 2007 at 09:08:34PM +0200, Fernando J. Pereda wrote: > > > On Mon, Aug 27, 2007 at 11:57:48AM -0700, Chris Gianelloni wrote: > > > > As many of you may know, the Gento

Re: [gentoo-dev] 2.4 profiles are on their way out!

On Mon, 2007-08-27 at 21:21 +0200, Fernando J. Pereda wrote: > On Mon, Aug 27, 2007 at 09:08:34PM +0200, Fernando J. Pereda wrote: > > On Mon, Aug 27, 2007 at 11:57:48AM -0700, Chris Gianelloni wrote: > > > As many of you may know, the Gentoo Kernel team has stopped supporting > > > our last 2.4 ke

Re: [gentoo-dev] 2.4 profiles are on their way out!

On Mon, Aug 27, 2007 at 09:08:34PM +0200, Fernando J. Pereda wrote: > On Mon, Aug 27, 2007 at 11:57:48AM -0700, Chris Gianelloni wrote: > > As many of you may know, the Gentoo Kernel team has stopped supporting > > our last 2.4 kernel sources in the tree, gentoo-sources-2.4. Since we > > no longer

Re: [gentoo-dev] 2.4 profiles are on their way out!

On Mon, Aug 27, 2007 at 11:57:48AM -0700, Chris Gianelloni wrote: > As many of you may know, the Gentoo Kernel team has stopped supporting > our last 2.4 kernel sources in the tree, gentoo-sources-2.4. Since we > no longer have an officially supported 2.4 kernel on alpha/sparc/x86, I > have deprec

[gentoo-dev] 2.4 profiles are on their way out!

As many of you may know, the Gentoo Kernel team has stopped supporting our last 2.4 kernel sources in the tree, gentoo-sources-2.4. Since we no longer have an officially supported 2.4 kernel on alpha/sparc/x86, I have deprecated the 2.4 profiles for those architectures. The 2.4 kernel has had a g

Re: [gentoo-dev] New developer: Davide Italiano (dav_it)

Il Monday 27 August 2007 18:02:01 Petteri Räty ha scritto: > Here follows the usual insults and introductions of our newest addition > Davide "dav_it" Italiano. After realizing that we has trying to log in > to dev.gentoo.org with a wrong user name he know has access to Gentoo > development boxes.

Re: [gentoo-dev] [QA] Repoman check for committing ebuilds with stable keywords

Mike Frysinger schrieb: > On Monday 27 August 2007, Daniel Pielmeier wrote: >> > http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=110443 >> >> It looks rather old! Why isn't it implemented? > > i bet if you posted a patch it'd get done quicker > -mike I would do so if i had any python skills ;) For me as

Re: [gentoo-dev] [QA] Repoman check for committing ebuilds with stable keywords

On Monday 27 August 2007, Daniel Pielmeier wrote: > > http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=110443 > > It looks rather old! Why isn't it implemented? i bet if you posted a patch it'd get done quicker -mike signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Re: [gentoo-dev] [QA] Repoman check for committing ebuilds with stable keywords

> http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=110443 > Thanks! It looks rather old! Why isn't it implemented? Regards, Daniel -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] [QA] Repoman check for committing ebuilds with stable keywords

Daniel Pielmeier kirjoitti: > Hi! > >>From time to time i recognize that ebuilds are committed straight to > stable into the gentoo tree, especially for version bumps where no > changes in the ebuild are required. It also happens to me when providing > ebuilds via bugzilla! > > So what about addi

[gentoo-dev] [QA] Repoman check for committing ebuilds with stable keywords

Hi! >From time to time i recognize that ebuilds are committed straight to stable into the gentoo tree, especially for version bumps where no changes in the ebuild are required. It also happens to me when providing ebuilds via bugzilla! So what about adding a repoman check to cover this. If a ebui

[gentoo-dev] New developer: Davide Italiano (dav_it)

Here follows the usual insults and introductions of our newest addition Davide "dav_it" Italiano. After realizing that we has trying to log in to dev.gentoo.org with a wrong user name he know has access to Gentoo development boxes. He will be using his powers in the Artwork and GWN teams. Davide is

[gentoo-dev] Last rites: app-emacs/slime-cvs

# Ulrich Mueller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (27 Aug 2007) # Live CVS broken due to upstream changes, pending removal in 30 days. app-emacs/slime-cvs A substitute app-emacs/slime- is available in the gentoo-lisp overlay: Ulrich -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] maili