A gentoo user requested in bug 190143 [1] to change the way pppd deals
with interface up/down events. He requested to break current
ip-up/ip-down functionality into different scripts contained in
/etc/ppp/(ip-up.d,ip-down.d}.
What do you think about? Is it worth it?
Personally I think it is a goo
It's not that I have anything important to add, but oh no! I've just played it
and lost against gnuchess.. and now it turns out it was a goodbye. Why is it
always like this: nice apps are being swallowed by some all-embracing packages
of some enormous desktop environments, which I do not use :|
# Alfredo Tupone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (25 Aug 2007)
# Masked for removal
# glchess is now part of gnome-games
gnome-board/glchess
As glchess is now part of gnome-extra/gnome-games will be installed as
default on all gnome-equipped desktop. Hope that the non gnome users
actually using that have an e
# Alin Năstac <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (25 Aug 2007)
# Has been inactive for several years; scheduled for removal in 60 days.
# Please use net-dialup/xl2tpd (fork actively maintained by Xelerance)
# or use net-dialup/rp-l2tp.
net-dialup/l2tpd
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On Sat, 2007-08-25 at 14:53 +0100, Luis Medinas wrote:
> Definitly the python herd seems understaffed even ruby (as a much less
> popular language) has more members. This was a good week for the python
> herd nice job!
>
Obviously ruby is much more fun than python, so there should be more
people
On Sat, 2007-08-25 at 12:43 +0200, Tiziano Müller wrote:
> Luis Medinas wrote:
>
> > Nice to know this, python 2.4 is really broken for us but python 2.5 is
> > the right thing to do imo. Too bad it took too much to unmask it.
>
> Well, finally some good people joined the python-herd and helped w
Luis Medinas wrote:
> Nice to know this, python 2.4 is really broken for us but python 2.5 is
> the right thing to do imo. Too bad it took too much to unmask it.
Well, finally some good people joined the python-herd and helped with testing
and fixing instead of just grumbling around.
signature
Thomas Anderson wrote:
> Thanks!
> Is there any roadmap for stabilizing python-2.5(as in weeks,months,
> decades?) ;)
Well, I guess we should just apply the usual "30 days rule" here.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Hanno Böck wrote:
> Hi,
>
> With compiz 0.5.4, we get the first version that depends on xcb.
> While we still have an open bug asking for use-masking xcb
> https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=174434
> I'd like to open the question just the other way round: When can we make
> xcb default?
Is
