On Tue, 2007-08-07 at 05:40 -0400, Michael Cummings wrote:
>
> sure...except in another thread, we're saying it's ok for non-maintainers to
> bump packages, and i'm here to tell you, when that happens they rarely confirm
> things like missing deps or whether it dies during a build.
What? They won'
> "Sven" == Sven Köhler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
JimC> There are many more ebuilds than just hal which fail with a
JimC> compressed pci.ids file.
Sven> Oh! Really? Which ones?
I didn't keep a list, but Ryan's post lists some packages I remember
having had problems.
-JimC
--
James Cloos
On Fri, 13 Jul 2007 08:33:04 Steve Long wrote:
> OFC you require all Gentoo ebuilds to be assigned to Gentoo-- that's fair
> enough, I accept and support that. It just seems odd that we can't
> contribute under GPL3 if we so choose. But yeah, all stuff in Gentoo is (C)
> by the Foundation, and it's
