The attached list notes all of the packages that were added or removed
from the tree, for the week ending 2007-07-29 23h59 UTC.
Removals:
net-libs/linc 2007-07-27 10:32:14 eva
games-fps/vendetta-online-bin 2007-07-28 00:31:34 wolf31o2
dev-python/pyunit 200
Thanks all :)
Kind Regards,
Dimitry Bradt
Christian Heim wrote:
> It's my pleasure to (re)-introduce to you Dimitry Brad (also known as diox on
> IRC), our latest addition joining the x86 arch monkeys.
>
> Dimitry has been a Gentoo Developer for quite some time (it has been nearly a
> year now
On Mon, Jul 30, 2007 at 04:51:17PM +0200, Benedikt Boehm wrote:
> Yep. Maybe it is also a good idea to make a stand-alone ebuild for the
> qmail-spp plugins in the tarball i have collected, cleaned up and
> tested so far, so we do not need to handle that in the qmail ebuilds..?
That's a great idea
On Mon, 30 Jul 2007 14:23:52 +0200
Michael Hanselmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 30, 2007 at 01:20:43PM +0200, Benedikt Boehm wrote:
> > > - I don't like the custom tarball. How do you want to build and
> > > redistribute it without depending on a single person? Its
> > > sources n
On Mon, Jul 30, 2007 at 01:20:43PM +0200, Benedikt Boehm wrote:
> Well, i think the unpack stuff could be handled in the ebuild, but i'd
> still like to keep dospp, so ebuilds like vpopmail can install
> spp-plugins in a standardized way..
dospp is fine. Well, maybe rename it to doqmail-spp to mak
On Fri, 27 Jul 2007 13:08:36 +0200
Michael Hanselmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello Benedikt
>
> Sorry for my long response times.
>
> On Mon, Jul 23, 2007 at 09:58:17PM +0200, Benedikt Boehm wrote:
> > i thought about this, but i'd really like to see things like
> > qmail-spp and the gento
