Petteri Räty wrote:
> Your doc zombie Sven Vermeulen has risen from his grave and is back to
> beat www.gentoo.org/doc/en with his fingers. Give him the usual welcome
> with nice head shots.
Muahahaha. /me blows Sven's head off with a sawed-off shotgun, or maybe
a sniper rifle would be nicer ;)
W
On 7/29/07, Christian Heim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It's my pleasure to (re)-introduce to you Dimitry Brad (also known as diox on
> IRC), our latest addition joining the x86 arch monkeys.
>
> Dimitry has been a Gentoo Developer for quite some time (it has been nearly a
> year now), and he final
Il Sunday 29 July 2007 22:26:54 Christian Heim ha scritto:
> It's my pleasure to (re)-introduce to you Dimitry Brad (also known as diox
> on IRC), our latest addition joining the x86 arch monkeys.
>
> Dimitry has been a Gentoo Developer for quite some time (it has been nearly
> a year now), and he
On 29-07-2007 22:26:54 +0200, Christian Heim wrote:
...
> So please welcome Dimitry as a new (old) fellow developer among us !
Welkom!
--
Fabian Groffen
Gentoo on a different level
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
Christian Heim a écrit :
It's my pleasure to (re)-introduce to you Dimitry Brad (also known as diox on
IRC), our latest addition joining the x86 arch monkeys.
Dimitry has been a Gentoo Developer for quite some time (it has been nearly a
year now), and he finally sent in his ebuild quiz and thu
On Sun, 2007-07-29 at 13:15 -0600, Ryan Hill wrote:
> Wulf C. Krueger wrote:
> >> Why did you provocate this breakage?
> >> This is not a good idea, IMHO.
> >
> > I think so, too. cf. http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=166790
>
> That has got to be one of the stupidest bug reports i've ever s
Christian Heim wrote:
> It's my pleasure to (re)-introduce to you Dimitry Brad (also known as diox on
> IRC), our latest addition joining the x86 arch monkeys.
>
> Dimitry has been a Gentoo Developer for quite some time (it has been nearly a
> year now), and he finally sent in his ebuild quiz an
This will be a (hopefully) weekly summary of packages masked for future
removal. If there are any errors, please let me know.
--
dirtyepicyou'd be tossed up or wash up, the narrator relates
gentoo org in a spartan antarctican walk for many days
9B81 6C9F E791 83BB 3AB3 5B2D E62
It's my pleasure to (re)-introduce to you Dimitry Brad (also known as diox on
IRC), our latest addition joining the x86 arch monkeys.
Dimitry has been a Gentoo Developer for quite some time (it has been nearly a
year now), and he finally sent in his ebuild quiz and thus becoming a
full-fledged
Heya,
We (as in the apache maintainers) finally figured that the move from net-www
to www-servers (bug #78622) and www-apache (bug #81244) is long overdue.
Thus I spent the afternoon moving all apache modules (as far as those
maintained by the apache herd) to www-apache and apache itself to ww
Wulf C. Krueger wrote:
>> Why did you provocate this breakage?
>> This is not a good idea, IMHO.
>
> I think so, too. cf. http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=166790
That has got to be one of the stupidest bug reports i've ever seen.
--
dirtyepicyou'd be tossed up or wash up, the narrator
Sven Köhler wrote:
Why did you provocate this breakage?
Which breakage? It didn't install a gzipped pci.ids here.
That is with USE=hal. Crap...
Oh! So USE="hal" forces pciutils not to use zlib?
And so the check, which the hal ebuild performs, should be modified to
check for USE="hal" rather
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
2007-07-29 20:03:55 Sven Köhler napisał(a):
> >>> Why did you provocate this breakage?
> >>
> >> Which breakage? It didn't install a gzipped pci.ids here.
> >
> > That is with USE=hal. Crap...
>
> Oh! So USE="hal" forces pciutils not to use zlib?
>
> A
>>> Why did you provocate this breakage?
>> Which breakage? It didn't install a gzipped pci.ids here.
>
> That is with USE=hal. Crap...
Oh! So USE="hal" forces pciutils not to use zlib?
And so the check, which the hal ebuild performs, should be modified to
check for USE="hal" rather than for USE
>> Why did you provocate this breakage?
>> This is not a good idea, IMHO.
>
> No. And many gave up getting this sensible again.
> As is, the default USE flags for a desktop profile lead to a compilation
> failure when unattended due to this, which is very very bad.
I'm not even complaining about
On Sonntag, 29. Juli 2007, Carsten Lohrke wrote:
> Don Sonntag, 29. Juli 2007, Sven Köhler wrote:
> > Why did you provocate this breakage?
>
> Which breakage? It didn't install a gzipped pci.ids here.
That is with USE=hal. Crap...
Carsten
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed m
Don Sonntag, 29. Juli 2007, Sven Köhler wrote:
> Why did you provocate this breakage?
Which breakage? It didn't install a gzipped pci.ids here.
On the other hand, reading the utterly ridiculous bug 180554, I haven't read a
valid argument why it should at all. Bizarre.
Carsten
signature.asc
On Sunday, 29. July 2007 18:44:23 Sven Köhler wrote:
> Why did you provocate this breakage?
> This is not a good idea, IMHO.
I think so, too. cf. http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=166790
Best regards, Wulf
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
On P, 2007-07-29 at 18:44 +0200, Sven Köhler wrote:
> Hi,
>
> so today, pciutils-2.2.4-r3 went stable on x86.
> It's a known issue, that pciutils compiled with zlib use-flag turned on
> (which is default) doesn't work with the version of hal, which is
> currently stable on x86.
>
> So at the mome
Hi,
so today, pciutils-2.2.4-r3 went stable on x86.
It's a known issue, that pciutils compiled with zlib use-flag turned on
(which is default) doesn't work with the version of hal, which is
currently stable on x86.
So at the moment, hal-0.5.9-r1 is stable on x86. It went stable weeks or
even mont
# Benedikt Boehm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (29 Jul 2007)
# Masked for removal: Does not work with apache 2.2
# and no release since 2004, use mod_transform instead
www-apache/mod_xslt
will be removed in 30 days as usual.
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
21 matches
Mail list logo
