The attached list notes all of the packages that were added or removed
from the tree, for the week ending 2007-05-27 23h59 UTC.
Removals:
games-server/armagetronad-ded 2007-05-22 18:02:48 nyhm
dev-java/systray4j 2007-05-23 08:42:42 ali_bush
sy
William L. Thomson Jr. napsal(a):
> This has sparked the following open bugs, and countless more closed
> ones :(
>
> http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=153496
> http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160302
> http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=164523
> http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?
Ulrich Mueller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I would also strongly favor if both gnupg-1 and gnupg-2 could be kept
> in different slots.
And maybe an eselect (or similar) to select whether external programs
which call use gpg-1 or gpg-2.
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
> On Sun, 27 May 2007, William L Thomson wrote:
> For some time now those maintaining gnupg have been attempting to go
> gnupg-2 only on Gentoo. I have tried to support that effort, despite
> all other distros supporting/providing both. Not to mention all
> gnupg release notes stating.
There
For some time now those maintaining gnupg have been attempting to go
gnupg-2 only on Gentoo. I have tried to support that effort, despite all
other distros supporting/providing both. Not to mention all gnupg
release notes stating.
"GnuPG-2 has a different architecture than GnuPG-1 (e.g. 1.4.7) in
On 27/05/07, Thilo Bangert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[...and many others...]
What I deeply miss from gentoo-dev mailing list is lack of summary at
end of discussions. Current situation is that at the end of such
disputes very often (of course not always :) is still unclear if:
* decision has be
* Fabian Groffen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [07/05/26 10:52 +0200]:
> Current state of muttng is a bit vague. It tries to be a collection of
> patches against the latest development version of Mutt.
I tried to create a muttng-flavoured mutt ebuild out of this
patches-collection. Initially I wanted a si
"Robin H. Johnson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> On Wed, May 23, 2007 at 07:49:43PM +0200, Thilo Bangert wrote:
> > Also, many ebuilds put the herds email address as an additional
> > . This is simply redundant and unless complaints are
> > raised, all herd tags will be removed and replaced by
> > t
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Robin H. Johnson wrote:
> On Sun, May 27, 2007 at 12:23:56PM +0200, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
>> Bug was fixed yesterday, keywords added, so to let you know. I would of
>> course love to go now and add these keywords to all my (java) current
>> bugs but n
On Sun, May 27, 2007 at 12:23:56PM +0200, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
> Bug was fixed yesterday, keywords added, so to let you know. I would of
> course love to go now and add these keywords to all my (java) current
> bugs but not wanna get wrath of arch teams for bugspam. So I'm asking if
> they would
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jim Ramsay wrote:
> Chris Gianelloni wrote:
>> On Wed, 2007-04-18 at 07:39 -0600, Jim Ramsay wrote:
>>> Vlastimil Babka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Or maybe implement new bugzilla keywords, like STABLEREQ and
KEYWORDREQ which would be added to
# Samuli Suominen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (27 May 2007)
# Orphaned library which was used for Xfce 4.2.
# Masked for removal in 30 days unless someone
# wants to take over maintainership from xfce.
dev-libs/dbh
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
12 matches
Mail list logo
