Peter Gordon wrote:
> On Sun, 2007-05-13 at 01:19 +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
>> Supporting this would be a huge policy violation, and not so merely as
>> a technicality. I suggest simply removing ion support from the main
>> tree, and sticking it in an overlay that comes with a big warning
>> te
On Sat, 12 May 2007 18:22:41 -0700
Peter Gordon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Could we not simply rename it, as has been suggested many times thus
> far? Then we could mask ion3 and let people know why and what it was
> renamed to, et al.
Presumably this would require maintaining updated documentat
On Sun, 2007-05-13 at 01:19 +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> Supporting this would be a huge policy violation, and not so merely as
> a technicality. I suggest simply removing ion support from the main
> tree, and sticking it in an overlay that comes with a big warning
> telling users that they cann
On Sun, 13 May 2007 00:13:57 +0200
Matti Bickel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> recently, there's been some worries about the changes and new
> requirements the ion upstream, tuomov, put forth in a new LICENSE for
> ion-3. It's main additions are a "timely response clause", which
> requires us to get
Peter Gordon napsal(a):
> On Sun, 2007-05-13 at 00:41 +0200, Jakub Moc wrote:
>> Well, one could ask why we should provide ebuild for stuff that has
>> apparently insane upstream, instead of just dropping such junk until the
>> upstream guy realizes that the world doesn't spin around him.
>
> But
On Sun, 2007-05-13 at 00:41 +0200, Jakub Moc wrote:
> Well, one could ask why we should provide ebuild for stuff that has
> apparently insane upstream, instead of just dropping such junk until the
> upstream guy realizes that the world doesn't spin around him.
But if we did this, we'd have no cdre
Jan Kundrát napsal(a):
> Matti Bickel wrote:
>> It's main additions are a "timely response clause", which
>> requires us to get the same keywords for a newly released version as the
>> previous had within 28 days. Another point is the "no patches" clause,
>> which prohibits distributions from carry
Jan Kundrát wrote:
> Matti Bickel wrote:
>> It's main additions are a "timely response clause", which
>> requires us to get the same keywords for a newly released version as the
>> previous had within 28 days. Another point is the "no patches" clause,
>> which prohibits distributions from carrying
Matti Bickel wrote:
> It's main additions are a "timely response clause", which
> requires us to get the same keywords for a newly released version as the
> previous had within 28 days. Another point is the "no patches" clause,
> which prohibits distributions from carrying a "significantly modified
Hi,
recently, there's been some worries about the changes and new
requirements the ion upstream, tuomov, put forth in a new LICENSE for
ion-3. It's main additions are a "timely response clause", which
requires us to get the same keywords for a newly released version as the
previous had within 28 da
Kevin F. Quinn kirjoitti:
>
> All these exceptions are doing the same thing - relaxing the GPL as it
> applies to the compiler (or template library in this case), so that it
> does not apply to works created using it. I like the
> "GPL-2-with-linking-exception" license name that the gnu-classpath
On Sat, 12 May 2007 12:41:58 +0100
"Marcus D. Hanwell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> There is a template library called Eigen I would like to add to the
> tree. It is a dependency of an application I would like to add
> shortly. It will also end up being a dependency of KDE 4 (for
> kalzium). My qu
On Sat, 12 May 2007 17:36:28 + (UTC)
Duncan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Are any other LiveCDs using it yet or otherwise providing IPv6 DHCP
> functionality? What do they do? Surely it's not just a Gentoo
> problem.
There's only one dhcp IPv6 client, and thats dhcpv6 which hasn't been
updat
Roy Marples <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted
[EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on Sat,
12 May 2007 16:16:38 +0100:
> Although it's a requirement for IPv6 DHCP, it's recommended for IPv4
> these days too. It is a requirement for IPv4 DHCP over infiniband as
> that has MAC address sizes that are great
On 5/12/07, Alec Warner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 5/12/07, Jakub Moc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Nice utility, now unfortunately a bit orphaned and with lots of open
> bugs. If you are interested, see http://tinyurl.com/2mkd7s
>
> Thanks.
>
> --
> Best regards,
>
> Jakub Moc
> mailto:[EMAI
On Sat, 12 May 2007 11:34:10 + (UTC)
Duncan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Mike Frysinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted
> [EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on Sat, 12 May
> 2007 06:47:38 -0400:
>
> > On Friday 11 May 2007, Roy Marples wrote:
> >> livecd
> >> (only a livecd is volative, even emb
On Sat, 12 May 2007 09:00:34 -0400
Mike Frysinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Saturday 12 May 2007, Carsten Lohrke wrote:
> > Does it matter that the DUID-LLT isn't stored when starting from a
> > Live-CD? I don't see why there is the need for a use flag for this
> > functionality, when it doe
On Sat, May 12, 2007 at 04:21:52PM +0200, Carsten Lohrke wrote:
> On Samstag, 12. Mai 2007, Harald van Dijk wrote:
> > Do you need to accept the unmodified GPL-2 for software licensed under
> > the GPL-2 plus exception? No? Then GPL-2 does not belong in LICENSE,
> > unless in a || group.
>
> Of cou
On Saturday 12 May 2007 15:22:15 Carsten Lohrke wrote:
> On Samstag, 12. Mai 2007, Harald van Dijk wrote:
> > Do you need to accept the unmodified GPL-2 for software licensed under
> > the GPL-2 plus exception? No? Then GPL-2 does not belong in LICENSE,
> > unless in a || group.
>
> Of course you ac
Hi again,
Thilo Bangert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> The metadata cleanup continues...
>
> A list of 427 packages found at
>
> http://dev.gentoo.org/~bangert/herd-metadata-check.log
>
> do not have the required tag in their metadata.xml[1].
some of these have tags afterall - albeit empty.
On Samstag, 12. Mai 2007, Harald van Dijk wrote:
> Do you need to accept the unmodified GPL-2 for software licensed under
> the GPL-2 plus exception? No? Then GPL-2 does not belong in LICENSE,
> unless in a || group.
Of course you accept the GPL plus the added exception. Just because an
exception
Hi all!
As announced in the 30 April 2007 edition of GWN [1], net-www/apache-1*
as well as all packages depending/using it were masked, pending removal
on 12 June 2007.
I fixed all packages, dependencies, etc. I could find to work correctly
after the masking (generally removing Apache 1.X support f
On Sat, May 12, 2007 at 03:13:02PM +0200, Carsten Lohrke wrote:
> On Samstag, 12. Mai 2007, Harald van Dijk wrote:
> > On Sat, May 12, 2007 at 02:27:20PM +0200, Carsten Lohrke wrote:
> > > No. LICENSE="GPL-2 some-exception" suffices.
> >
> > No, that means something completely different. It means th
On Samstag, 12. Mai 2007, Harald van Dijk wrote:
> On Sat, May 12, 2007 at 02:27:20PM +0200, Carsten Lohrke wrote:
> > No. LICENSE="GPL-2 some-exception" suffices.
>
> No, that means something completely different. It means that you should
> install the software only if you find both the GPL-2 and t
On Saturday 12 May 2007, Carsten Lohrke wrote:
> More important, what's with optional dependencies!? We don't support
>
> LICENSE="GPL-2 ssl? ( openssl-exception)"
yes we do
-mike
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
On Sat, May 12, 2007 at 02:27:20PM +0200, Carsten Lohrke wrote:
> No. LICENSE="GPL-2 some-exception" suffices.
No, that means something completely different. It means that you should
install the software only if you find both the GPL-2 and the exception
acceptable, rather than if you find the comb
On Saturday 12 May 2007, Carsten Lohrke wrote:
> Does it matter that the DUID-LLT isn't stored when starting from a Live-CD?
> I don't see why there is the need for a use flag for this functionality,
> when it doesn't imply a new dependency.
the concern was to have a way to provide "nice" clients
Marcus D. Hanwell kirjoitti:
> There is a template library called Eigen I would like to add to the tree. It
> is a dependency of an application I would like to add shortly. It will also
> end up being a dependency of KDE 4 (for kalzium). My question relates to the
> licence the code is released
On Sat, May 12, 2007 at 02:27:43PM +0200, Carsten Lohrke wrote:
> No. LICENSE="GPL-2 some-exception" suffices. That said, we suck at our
> licensing information badly. E.g. every single ebuild linking against OpenSSL
> has (or at least needs to have) a linking exeption. We don't flag this
> anyw
Does it matter that the DUID-LLT isn't stored when starting from a Live-CD? I
don't see why there is the need for a use flag for this functionality, when
it doesn't imply a new dependency.
Carsten
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Err, every single _GPL_licensed_ software needs an OpenSSL exception of
course.
Carsten
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
No. LICENSE="GPL-2 some-exception" suffices. That said, we suck at our
licensing information badly. E.g. every single ebuild linking against OpenSSL
has (or at least needs to have) a linking exeption. We don't flag this
anywhere. More important, what's with optional dependencies!? We don't
supp
On Saturday 12 May 2007, Duncan wrote:
> Mike Frysinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted
> > On Friday 11 May 2007, Roy Marples wrote:
> >> livecd
> >> (only a livecd is volative, even embedded devices have non volative
> >> storage)
> >
> > i would use that myself ... perhaps even tie in USE=netboot ...
There is a template library called Eigen I would like to add to the tree. It
is a dependency of an application I would like to add shortly. It will also
end up being a dependency of KDE 4 (for kalzium). My question relates to the
licence the code is released under.
It is licenced under the GNU
Mike Frysinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted
[EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on Sat, 12 May
2007 06:47:38 -0400:
> On Friday 11 May 2007, Roy Marples wrote:
>> livecd
>> (only a livecd is volative, even embedded devices have non volative
>> storage)
>
> i would use that myself ... perhaps even
Nice utility, now unfortunately a bit orphaned and with lots of open
bugs. If you are interested, see http://tinyurl.com/2mkd7s
Thanks.
--
Best regards,
Jakub Moc
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
GPG signature:
http://subkeys.pgp.net:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xCEBA3D9E
Primary key fingerprin
On Friday 11 May 2007, Roy Marples wrote:
> livecd
> (only a livecd is volative, even embedded devices have non volative
> storage)
i would use that myself ... perhaps even tie in USE=netboot ...
-mike
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
On Thursday 10 May 2007, Doug Goldstein wrote:
> Thilo Bangert wrote:
> > All packages with maintainer-needed will be moved to
> > no-herd.
>
> maintainer-needed is different from no-herd. no-herd is valid when a dev
> is maintaining a pkg outside of a herd. no-herd is not valid for when
> the pack
Jim Ramsay wrote:
>> > This meets the following goals:
>> > 1) It makes it easy for "regular" users to get netscape-flash with
>> > any additions required by any global USE flags in exactly one step:
>> > - emerge netscape-flash
>> So, in netscape-flash:
>> RDEPEND="
>> ssl? ( foo/libflashsupp
Roy Marples <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted
[EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on Sat,
12 May 2007 00:10:18 +0100:
> dhcpcd-3.1 is [...] almost ready to be put into the tree. [N]ew
> feature[:] generates a DUID-LLT [which should persist] across reboots.
> I would like a nice USE flag name, so it can
40 matches
Mail list logo
