Alec Warner wrote:
> The benefits include making the layout cleaner, obsoleting the
> categories file.
You talked a lot about how to do this, but I'd like to see you expand on
the reasoning for why. Balancing the breakage and extra work against the
reasons for making the change is hard to do witho
oops, sent with wrong address the first time.
-- Forwarded message --
From: Alec Warner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: May 8, 2007 9:09 PM
Subject: [RFC - Moving categories around]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
So a random thought I had was 'lets move categories out of gentoo-x86/ and
into ge
On Tue, 8 May 2007 23:04:44 -0700
"Alec Warner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So a random thought I had was 'lets move categories out of
> gentoo-x86/ and into gentoo-x86/ebuilds/'
If you're going to go and break everything, do it in style! Add in
support for packages belonging to multiple categori
The current ebuild is outdated and there's a couple of minor issues that
are getting stale. If you are interested, see http://tinyurl.com/s8o6k
Thanks.
--
Best regards,
Jakub Moc
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
GPG signature:
http://subkeys.pgp.net:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xCEBA3D9E
Primar
Hi all,
I'm sure I'm not the only one with a number of projects I'll never get
to, but I'd really like them to happen anyway. I suggest we create some
sort of page that aggregates all of these personal projects together, so
anyone can browse through them and look for stuff that sounds fun.
The go
Daniel Ostrow wrote:
> Mine is an x86_64 system...it also only seems to affect early adopters
> of VMWare Workstation 6, which hasn't been released yet no less
> considered *stable*.
>
> --Dan
ok, then it only affects *some* amd64 users, but
app-emulation/vmware-workstation-5.5.3.34685 seems
to
On Wed, 2007-05-09 at 00:36 +0100, Mike Auty wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Hiya,
> Reading over the discussion on lkml, it appears that it only affects
> x86_64 systems...
> Mike 5:)
Mine is an x86_64 system...it also only seems to affect early adopters
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hiya,
Reading over the discussion on lkml, it appears that it only affects
x86_64 systems...
Mike 5:)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2.0.3 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFGQQlpu7rWomwgFXoRAhzPAJ94Dcg/S0a6dtHodXRyPRgRT4CS0gCdHSW2
ksz
On Wed, 2007-05-09 at 01:11 +0200, Florian D. wrote:
> Daniel Drake wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > 2.6.21 was released today. Testing muchly appreciated as usual -- please
> > file bugs and clearly mark them as 2.6.21 regressions if that is the case.
> >
>
> hello,
> 2.6.21 will break the current *stabl
Hi
Could the ~80 people that are still seeding the 2006.1 release on
BitTorrent please move to seeding the 2007.0 release instead?
The 6 torrents below are the most popular (in order), and account for 98% of
the BitTorrent traffic since the 2007.0 release yesterday.
1. livedvd-i686-installer-200
Daniel Drake wrote:
> Hi,
>
> 2.6.21 was released today. Testing muchly appreciated as usual -- please
> file bugs and clearly mark them as 2.6.21 regressions if that is the case.
>
hello,
2.6.21 will break the current *stable* VMware worstation. VMware 6 will work
again. please see the
followi
On Tue, 2007-05-08 at 20:10 +0300, Petteri Räty wrote:
> Vytautas Jakutis kirjoitti:
> > On Sun, 29 Apr 2007 17:00:09 +0200, Petteri Räty wrote:
> >
> >> We want to implement virtuals for Java at some point and for that we
> >> need to know the package that provides the virtual because some virtua
Vytautas Jakutis kirjoitti:
> On Sun, 29 Apr 2007 17:00:09 +0200, Petteri Räty wrote:
>
>> We want to implement virtuals for Java at some point and for that we
>> need to know the package that provides the virtual because some virtuals
>> can be provided by the JDK or normal packages and this affe
On Sun, 29 Apr 2007 17:00:09 +0200, Petteri Räty wrote:
> We want to implement virtuals for Java at some point and for that we
> need to know the package that provides the virtual because some virtuals
> can be provided by the JDK or normal packages and this affects the JDK
> selection at build ti
14 matches
Mail list logo