Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC - Moving categories around]

2007-05-08 Thread Donnie Berkholz
Alec Warner wrote: > The benefits include making the layout cleaner, obsoleting the > categories file. You talked a lot about how to do this, but I'd like to see you expand on the reasoning for why. Balancing the breakage and extra work against the reasons for making the change is hard to do witho

[gentoo-dev] [RFC - Moving categories around]

2007-05-08 Thread Alec Warner
oops, sent with wrong address the first time. -- Forwarded message -- From: Alec Warner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: May 8, 2007 9:09 PM Subject: [RFC - Moving categories around] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] So a random thought I had was 'lets move categories out of gentoo-x86/ and into ge

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC - Moving categories around]

2007-05-08 Thread Ciaran McCreesh
On Tue, 8 May 2007 23:04:44 -0700 "Alec Warner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > So a random thought I had was 'lets move categories out of > gentoo-x86/ and into gentoo-x86/ebuilds/' If you're going to go and break everything, do it in style! Add in support for packages belonging to multiple categori

[gentoo-dev] mail-mta/courier needs a maintainer

2007-05-08 Thread Jakub Moc
The current ebuild is outdated and there's a couple of minor issues that are getting stale. If you are interested, see http://tinyurl.com/s8o6k Thanks. -- Best regards, Jakub Moc mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] GPG signature: http://subkeys.pgp.net:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xCEBA3D9E Primar

[gentoo-dev] Increasing contributions and interest via personal project aggregation

2007-05-08 Thread Donnie Berkholz
Hi all, I'm sure I'm not the only one with a number of projects I'll never get to, but I'd really like them to happen anyway. I suggest we create some sort of page that aggregates all of these personal projects together, so anyone can browse through them and look for stuff that sounds fun. The go

Re: [gentoo-dev] Linux 2.6.21 plans

2007-05-08 Thread Florian D.
Daniel Ostrow wrote: > Mine is an x86_64 system...it also only seems to affect early adopters > of VMWare Workstation 6, which hasn't been released yet no less > considered *stable*. > > --Dan ok, then it only affects *some* amd64 users, but app-emulation/vmware-workstation-5.5.3.34685 seems to

Re: [gentoo-dev] Linux 2.6.21 plans

2007-05-08 Thread Daniel Ostrow
On Wed, 2007-05-09 at 00:36 +0100, Mike Auty wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Hiya, > Reading over the discussion on lkml, it appears that it only affects > x86_64 systems... > Mike 5:) Mine is an x86_64 system...it also only seems to affect early adopters

Re: [gentoo-dev] Linux 2.6.21 plans

2007-05-08 Thread Mike Auty
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hiya, Reading over the discussion on lkml, it appears that it only affects x86_64 systems... Mike 5:) -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2.0.3 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFGQQlpu7rWomwgFXoRAhzPAJ94Dcg/S0a6dtHodXRyPRgRT4CS0gCdHSW2 ksz

Re: [gentoo-dev] Linux 2.6.21 plans

2007-05-08 Thread Daniel Ostrow
On Wed, 2007-05-09 at 01:11 +0200, Florian D. wrote: > Daniel Drake wrote: > > Hi, > > > > 2.6.21 was released today. Testing muchly appreciated as usual -- please > > file bugs and clearly mark them as 2.6.21 regressions if that is the case. > > > > hello, > 2.6.21 will break the current *stabl

[gentoo-dev] Release BitTorrent seeding

2007-05-08 Thread Robin H. Johnson
Hi Could the ~80 people that are still seeding the 2006.1 release on BitTorrent please move to seeding the 2007.0 release instead? The 6 torrents below are the most popular (in order), and account for 98% of the BitTorrent traffic since the 2007.0 release yesterday. 1. livedvd-i686-installer-200

Re: [gentoo-dev] Linux 2.6.21 plans

2007-05-08 Thread Florian D.
Daniel Drake wrote: > Hi, > > 2.6.21 was released today. Testing muchly appreciated as usual -- please > file bugs and clearly mark them as 2.6.21 regressions if that is the case. > hello, 2.6.21 will break the current *stable* VMware worstation. VMware 6 will work again. please see the followi

Re: [gentoo-dev] Virtuals and Java

2007-05-08 Thread Vytautas Jakutis
On Tue, 2007-05-08 at 20:10 +0300, Petteri Räty wrote: > Vytautas Jakutis kirjoitti: > > On Sun, 29 Apr 2007 17:00:09 +0200, Petteri Räty wrote: > > > >> We want to implement virtuals for Java at some point and for that we > >> need to know the package that provides the virtual because some virtua

Re: [gentoo-dev] Virtuals and Java

2007-05-08 Thread Petteri Räty
Vytautas Jakutis kirjoitti: > On Sun, 29 Apr 2007 17:00:09 +0200, Petteri Räty wrote: > >> We want to implement virtuals for Java at some point and for that we >> need to know the package that provides the virtual because some virtuals >> can be provided by the JDK or normal packages and this affe

Re: [gentoo-dev] Virtuals and Java

2007-05-08 Thread Vytautas Jakutis
On Sun, 29 Apr 2007 17:00:09 +0200, Petteri Räty wrote: > We want to implement virtuals for Java at some point and for that we > need to know the package that provides the virtual because some virtuals > can be provided by the JDK or normal packages and this affects the JDK > selection at build ti