Peter Weller wrote:
On Sun, 15 Apr 2007 00:23:08 +0100
"Charlie Shepherd" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 15/04/07, Tobias Heinlein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Stefan Schweizer wrote:
Yup, I'm 16, phreak was "shocked" as well.
Welcome to the "young ones" :)
w00t! You'll be joining me, master
On Sun, 15 Apr 2007 00:23:08 +0100
"Charlie Shepherd" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 15/04/07, Tobias Heinlein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Stefan Schweizer wrote:
> > Yup, I'm 16, phreak was "shocked" as well.
>
> Welcome to the "young ones" :)
>
>
w00t! You'll be joining me, masteriverz,
On Saturday 14 April 2007, Matthias Langer wrote:
> bug 165085
i'd do some research into the glibc situation before you go pointing at it
-mike
pgpe73v4Qiw7K.pgp
Description: PGP signature
# Samuli Suominen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (15 Apr 2007)
# Using deprecated gdk functions from imlib.
# Masked for removal in 30 days. See bug #166009.
# Use gqview or mirage instead.
media-gfx/qiv
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
On Sat, 14 Apr 2007 22:46:10 +
"Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> We have different
> types of developers amongst us, so how do we count the 6 months
> period? Let me explain more fully. At this point, I could mentor
> someone into becoming a new moderator in the forums,
A modified version of app-vim/doxygen-syntax-1.15 is already included in
vim7, no point in keeping this around. See Bug #174637. Scheduled for
removal in 30 days.
--
Mike Kelly
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On 15/04/07, Tobias Heinlein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Stefan Schweizer wrote:
Yup, I'm 16, phreak was "shocked" as well.
Welcome to the "young ones" :)
--
-Charlie
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
On 07/04/07, Daniel Drake <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
klive isn't that useful and I don't have enough time to maintain it.
There are several bugs kicking about.
If nobody takes over, I'll package.mask it on April 14th and remove it
on April 28th.
I've fixed both bugs and added myself explicitly
Stefan Schweizer wrote:
> Wow he must be really young then.
Yup, I'm 16, phreak was "shocked" as well.
> But I cannot find the adequate german
> translation for "junior high school". What is it?
That should be "Realschule" in German. ;)
> Welcome to the devs!
>
> -Stefan
Thanks.
Best reg
Hi.
Petteri Räty wrote:
>
> Before you can mentor anyone, you must have been with Gentoo for at
> least six
> -months or must be a project lead.
> +months. Previously being a project lead was enough too but with GLEP 39
> anyone
> +can create new projects.
>
>
>
>
>
> Regards,
> Petteri
Christian Heim wrote:
> Tobias is joining us from Hamm, Germany where he's currently finishing the
> junior high school.
Wow he must be really young then. But I cannot find the adequate german
translation for "junior high school". What is it?
Welcome to the devs!
-Stefan
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] m
Before you can mentor anyone, you must have been with Gentoo for at
least six
-months or must be a project lead.
+months. Previously being a project lead was enough too but with GLEP 39
anyone
+can create new projects.
Regards,
Petteri
--
Gentoo/Recruiters lead
Gentoo/Java lead
signatu
On Sat, 14 Apr 2007 12:17:24 -0700
Alec Warner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The whole argument against doing it the other way is that running
> tests, outside of RESTRICT, has absolutly nothing to do with any kind
> of api; which is why I'm against it. At that point arch teams would
> essentially
On Sat, 14 Apr 2007 18:14:18 +0200
Christian Heim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> It's my pleasure to introduce to you Tobias Heinlein (also known as
> keytoaster on IRC), our latest addition joining the docs people as
> follow-up lead for the german documetation. He's already been an arch
> teste
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Sat, 14 Apr 2007 02:44:31 -0700
Alec Warner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Any arch team that wants tests by default on their arch can just add
test to FEATURES in their arch profiles; magically the users running
that arch will get the tests run (with USE=test set) by defa
On Sat, 2007-04-14 at 14:58 +0300, Petteri Räty wrote:
> Steve Long kirjoitti:
> >
> > That makes a lot of sense. How about exending it a tiny bit and asking for
> > it to be policy for all ebuilds EAPI=1 not to be allowed into stable
> > without RESTRICT=test, or a functional test suite on the ar
It's my pleasure to introduce to you Tobias Heinlein (also known as keytoaster
on IRC), our latest addition joining the docs people as follow-up lead for
the german documetation. He's already been an arch tester for the amd64 herd
for quite some time.
Tobias is joining us from Hamm, Germany wh
On Sat, 14 Apr 2007 08:43:39 +0100
Steve Long <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> There is no "company" behind dotProject.
What on earth are you on about? Please stop posting uninformed nonsense
to the list. The noise is getting in the way of sensible discussion.
--
Ciaran McCreesh
signature.asc
De
On Sat, 14 Apr 2007 02:44:31 -0700
Alec Warner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Any arch team that wants tests by default on their arch can just add
> test to FEATURES in their arch profiles; magically the users running
> that arch will get the tests run (with USE=test set) by default.
> Users who do
About time! :)
Wernfried Haas wrote:
On Sat, Apr 14, 2007 at 01:01:38PM +, Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto wrote:
Congrats on getting the official Gentoo colors! That means you have no
more excuse to "slacking" ;)
Unless of course you become forums admin, which is the best slacker
job ever. Ha
On Sat, Apr 14, 2007 at 01:01:38PM +, Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto wrote:
> Congrats on getting the official Gentoo colors! That means you have no
> more excuse to "slacking" ;)
Unless of course you become forums admin, which is the best slacker
job ever. Having that said i'm going back to the p
Hi.
Christian Heim wrote:
>
> It's my pleasure to introduce to you Thomas Scharl (also known as
> think4urs11), our latest addition joining the forum moderators.
>
> Thomas is joining us from Nürnberg (or Nuremberg), Germany, where he's
> currently working for an unnamed Networking/Security co
On Sat, Apr 14, 2007 at 07:47:12AM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > Because I don't have it either, luckily there is GMane:
> > http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.devel/48017
> ive found hooking up my NNTP client to GMane and downloading missed e-mails
> from there works quite well
>
> if
Steve Long kirjoitti:
>
> That makes a lot of sense. How about exending it a tiny bit and asking for
> it to be policy for all ebuilds EAPI=1 not to be allowed into stable
> without RESTRICT=test, or a functional test suite on the arch in question?
> The last bit would be automagically checked by t
On Saturday 14 April 2007, Fabian Groffen wrote:
> On 14-04-2007 01:19:41 -0700, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
> > On Sat, Apr 14, 2007 at 07:32:12AM +0100, Steve Long wrote:
> > > Fabian Groffen wrote:
> > > > This GLEP has been laying around for some long time now in my gleps
> > > > dir. I nearly forg
On Samstag, 14. April 2007, Christian Heim wrote:
> It's my pleasure to introduce to you Thomas Scharl (also known as
> think4urs11), our latest addition joining the forum moderators.
>
> Thomas is joining us from Nürnberg (or Nuremberg), Germany, where he's
> currently working for an unnamed Netwo
Matthias Langer wrote:
> Hmm, as an arch tester, i completely agree that packages where src_test
> fails are an annoyance. However, I would not suggest to activate
> src_test by default, as for normal users, it just introduces another
> source of potential defects, without that much benefits. Inste
It's my pleasure to introduce to you Thomas Scharl (also known as
think4urs11), our latest addition joining the forum moderators.
Thomas is joining us from Nürnberg (or Nuremberg), Germany, where he's
currently working for an unnamed Networking/Security company.
Please welcome Thomas as a new
Jan Kundrát napsal(a):
> Jakub Moc wrote:
>> Even such change would piss off users. Having *no* way to turn off
>> tests, uuuhhh please retire me *before* someone implements this, I'm not
>> going to waste my time on totally pointless bugs filed by furious users.
>
> FEATURES="-test"?
... wouldn'
Jakub Moc wrote:
> Alec Warner napsal(a):
>> Any arch team that wants tests by default on their arch can just add
>> test to FEATURES in their arch profiles; magically the users running
>> that arch will get the tests run (with USE=test set) by default. Users
>> who don't want tests can always tur
Alec Warner napsal(a):
> Any arch team that wants tests by default on their arch can just add
> test to FEATURES in their arch profiles; magically the users running
> that arch will get the tests run (with USE=test set) by default. Users
> who don't want tests can always turn them off in make.conf
Mike Frysinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted
[EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on Fri, 13 Apr
2007 23:01:40 -0400:
> they realize they have no way at all of disabling the mandatory test ...
> RESTRICT is an ebuild variable, not a package manager variable
> this is why implementing it via the prof
> > not having it tested.
> That all depends. If having it tested means that it _will_ work, I'd be
> infavour of that.
Well, the problem is, that a working test suite does not guarantee a
working program, as well as a failing test suite doesn't necessarily
mean that the program is broken. This
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
* src_test always called except if RESTRICT=test
I don't think this would fit into EAPI, to me it's an implementation
detail of the package manager, or why should the ebuild care about it?
It's the best way of ensuring that ebuilds have a working src_test.
Arch teams nee
Luca Barbato <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted [EMAIL PROTECTED],
excerpted below, on Sat, 14 Apr 2007 08:14:48 +0200:
> Adding more build time, requirements (yes, there are some tests that
> needs more ram and cpu to complete than the actual build phase) w/out
> ways to opt out is just hindering our us
Christopher Sawtell wrote:
> Indeed, but speaking as a user, one wants the application to build and work,
> that is after all the whole point of installing a package.
If you have it on the tree it is supposed to work or at least have
passed a round of tests on the developer system, so you don't w
On 14-04-2007 01:19:41 -0700, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 14, 2007 at 07:32:12AM +0100, Steve Long wrote:
> > Fabian Groffen wrote:
> > > This GLEP has been laying around for some long time now in my gleps dir.
> > > I nearly forgot about it. Anyway, feedback is appreciated.
>
>
> Grob
On Sat, Apr 14, 2007 at 07:32:12AM +0100, Steve Long wrote:
> Fabian Groffen wrote:
> > This GLEP has been laying around for some long time now in my gleps dir.
> > I nearly forgot about it. Anyway, feedback is appreciated.
Grobian: can you please resend your message to the list?
This is the se
On 14/04/07, Steve Long <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
...
Can I ask why you choose to enlighten the mailing list with your views
on this matter?
I was given to understand it was a *development* mailing list, not a
"talk trash about someone 'cuz they banned me from their channel"
mailing list.
--
There is no "company" behind dotProject.
Instead you are dealing with a dedicated but 100% volunteer group who give
their time and energy freely and frequently above and beyond the call of
duty.
The development team behind, under, in front of and frequently buried by
dotProject are a great bunc
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Steve Long wrote:
> Petteri Räty wrote:
>> We should link this info to the devmanual.
>
> Yeah that was v. instructive. Since there's only 3 ebuilds left with the old
> syntax, the obvious question is: is there anything else holding up impl of
> the G
Rumen Yotov wrote:
> Somebody might want to know (for a new install) for how long
> (eventually) he/she will have to wait.
You do not have to wait for the gentoo release engineering team. You will
get an up to date install after running emerge -uvaD system in your fresh
system.
If the livecd is n
Doug Goldstein wrote:
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scott_Tenorman_Must_Die
>
> I say we never piss Chris off again... ever...
Thank YOU! That was hilarious!
But seriously.. why don't you guys switch off reply-to munging, already?!
http://archives.gentoo.org/gentoo-dev/msg_120444.xml
--
[EMA
On Fri, 13 Apr 2007 18:34:00 -0700, M. Edward (Ed) Borasky wrote:
> Yes ... upstream moved to SVN right around the first of the year. If you
> want, I'll file something in bugzilla to get the details for Ruby 1.9
> into Portage as an enhancement. Most of my Rubyist friends go right to
> the source
44 matches
Mail list logo
