Ned Ludd wrote:
> On Mon, 2007-03-12 at 19:15 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
>> On Monday 12 March 2007, Mike Frysinger wrote:
>>> instead, since we require bash for our ebuilds, use the builtin `type -p`
>> `type -p` is almost a complete drop in replacement for which ... it does not
>> work on bas
Christel Dahlskjaer wrote:
> Hiya all,
>
> As some of you are already aware, I was at the last Council meeting
> given a Task. This Task was to draft a proposed Code of Conduct for
> Gentoo, and a scheme for enforcing it. The current version of this
> proposal can be found at http://dev.gentoo.or
On Mon, 12 Mar 2007 16:36:03 -0700
Ned Ludd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> And matches "$(which "
> x11-misc/xoo/xoo-0.7.ebuild:25:
Fixed.
Best wishes,
Yuri.
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
Mike Bonar wrote:
Christel Dahlskjaer wrote:
Hiya all,
As some of you are already aware, I was at the last Council meeting
given a Task. This Task was to draft a proposed Code of Conduct for
Gentoo, and a scheme for enforcing it. The current version of this
proposal can be found at http://dev.ge
Christel Dahlskjaer wrote:
Hiya all,
As some of you are already aware, I was at the last Council meeting
given a Task. This Task was to draft a proposed Code of Conduct for
Gentoo, and a scheme for enforcing it. The current version of this
proposal can be found at http://dev.gentoo.org/~christe
Hello
My name is Lara Thynne and I am a PhD candidate at Deakin University
Australia. I am currently researching the boundary between work and
leisure activities directly related to the open source community and
open source program development.
As part of this I am running a survey at the foll
Hiya all,
As some of you are already aware, I was at the last Council meeting
given a Task. This Task was to draft a proposed Code of Conduct for
Gentoo, and a scheme for enforcing it. The current version of this
proposal can be found at http://dev.gentoo.org/~christel/coc.xml
comments and sugges
Mike Frysinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted
[EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on Mon, 12 Mar
2007 15:54:49 -0400:
> On Monday 12 March 2007, Steve Long wrote:
>> Stephen Bennett wrote:
>> > Oh, and bashing ciaranm doesn't make you cool.
>>
>> Yeah and nor does sucking him off.
>
> seriously, sto
On Mon, 2007-03-12 at 16:36 -0700, Ned Ludd wrote:
> games-emulation/advancemame/advancemame-0.104.0.ebuild:35:
> games-emulation/advancemame/advancemame-0.104.0.ebuild:37:
> games-emulation/advancemame/advancemame-0.104.0.ebuild:39:
> games-emulation/advancemame/advancemame-0.106.0.ebuild:40:
> ga
The Gentoo Java Team held their March meeting this past weekend. At
which time a new team lead was elected.
Petteri Räty ( betelgeuse ) was unanimously elected as the new Java Team
Lead, taking the place of Joshua Nichols ( nichoj ). Josh has done an
excellent job over the past year or so. Tremend
On Tue, 13 Mar 2007 01:14:54 +0100
Thomas de Grenier de Latour <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Also there are some occurences in eclasses:
> ./eclass/vim-doc.eclass:
>vim=$(which vim 2>/dev/null)
> ./eclass/vim-doc.eclass:
>[[ -z "$vim" ]] && vim=$(which gvim 2>/dev/null)
> ./eclass/vim-doc
Am Dienstag, 13. März 2007 01:14 schrieb Thomas de Grenier de Latour:
> On 2007/03/12, Ned Ludd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Matches "`which "
> > ...
> > And matches "$(which "
> > ...
>
> Also there are some occurences in eclasses:
> ./eclass/fortran.eclass:
>elif [ -x "$(which ifc 2> /dev
Am Dienstag, 13. März 2007 00:36 schrieb Ned Ludd:
> > > instead, since we require bash for our ebuilds, use the builtin
> > > `type -p`
> >
> > err i botched that ;)
> >
> > `type -p` is almost a complete drop in replacement for which ... it
> > does not work on bash builtins however, so people sh
On 2007/03/12, Ned Ludd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Matches "`which "
> ...
> And matches "$(which "
> ...
Also there are some occurences in eclasses:
./eclass/enlightenment.eclass:
cp $(which gettextize) "${T}"/ || die "could not copy gettextize"
./eclass/fortran.eclass:
elif [ -x "$(w
On Mon, 2007-03-12 at 19:15 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Monday 12 March 2007, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > instead, since we require bash for our ebuilds, use the builtin `type -p`
>
> err i botched that ;)
>
> `type -p` is almost a complete drop in replacement for which ... it does not
> wor
On Monday 12 March 2007, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> instead, since we require bash for our ebuilds, use the builtin `type -p`
err i botched that ;)
`type -p` is almost a complete drop in replacement for which ... it does not
work on bash builtins however, so people should use `type -P` to force the
please dont use the `which` program in your ebuilds ... this thing isnt even
close to having standard behavior out there plus people can unmerge it :)
instead, since we require bash for our ebuilds, use the builtin `type -p` ...
here's some easy examples:
-if which foo 2>/dev/null ; then
+if ty
On 2007/03/12, Steve Long <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Are you really that dense?
http://tdegreni.free.fr/slong.png
Seriously, no need to even read this emails to guess who is
being dense today.
--
TGL.
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
On 12/03/07, Mike Frysinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
this thread is dead,
If only...
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
On Monday 12 March 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> (Again, this is subjective. FFtF, Feel Free to Flame)
no, do not
this thread is dead, if you guys want to go beat dead horses, take it off list
-mike
pgpfVMxaW9KlT.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Steve Long wrote:
> Oh no of course not. Paludis is in fact being led in the most appropriate
> political fashion, rather than the best technical approach for the job.
Dear Steve,
this is a formal request from an ordinary Gentoo developer who has
already emailed you privately several times asking
On Mon, 12 Mar 2007 20:53:35 +0100 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Besides, the article isnt that uninformed. Contrary, it quite clearly
> represents how users currently percieve the situation.
> (Again, this is subjective. FFtF, Feel Free to Flame)
If users feel that way, it's because they're reading
Charlie Shepherd napisał(a):
On 12/03/07, Steve Long <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
...
Please. This thread is *over*. No-one wants to play anymore.
Yeah, let's back to work guys.
--
Damian Florczyk
Gentoo/NetBSD Development Lead
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
On 12/03/07, Steve Long <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Stephen Bennett wrote:
> Oh, and bashing ciaranm doesn't make you cool.
Yeah and nor does sucking him off.
I wonder if the manglement at eclipse.co.uk would be pleased about the
impression of your company you're given when you post things lik
Stephen Bennett wrote:
> The only possible conclusion I can see to draw from this post is that
> because distrowatch posts an uninformed article about how Gentoo is
> dying, you need to drag up a dead thread for no apparent reason. Please
> enlighten me if there's something I missed.
You seem to ha
On Monday 12 March 2007, Steve Long wrote:
> Stephen Bennett wrote:
> > Oh, and bashing ciaranm doesn't make you cool.
>
> Yeah and nor does sucking him off.
seriously, stop it
if you want to flame, take it off list
-mike
pgpYpYmwZEx9P.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Stephen Bennett wrote:
> On Mon, 12 Mar 2007 17:57:09 +
>
> Steve Long <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > And if you think the way you have carried on is anything approaching
> > decent, you clearly haven't read the guidelines... Can we stop now
> > please?
>
> Based on a cursory view of my gentoo-
Stephen Bennett wrote:
> Oh, and bashing ciaranm doesn't make you cool.
Yeah and nor does sucking him off.
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
On Mon, 12 Mar 2007 19:35:03 +
Steve Long <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Guess what sunshine? It's not just about you:
> http://distrowatch.com/weekly.php?issue=20070312#future
The only possible conclusion I can see to draw from this post is that
because distrowatch posts an u
On 12/03/07, Steve Long <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
...
Please. This thread is *over*. No-one wants to play anymore.
--
-Charlie
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
Stephen Bennett wrote:
> Based on a cursory view of my gentoo-dev folder, we had stopped for a
> good five days until earlier today.
Guess what sunshine? It's not just about you:
http://distrowatch.com/weekly.php?issue=20070312#future
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
Stephen Bennett wrote:
>> Yes so in a /technical/ sense he's the lead. You defer to his greater
>> knowledge. Or are you more political than technical?
>
> Nowhere did I say anything of the sort. Stop jumping to conclusions
> based on incorrect assumptions and incomplete information.
>
..or indeed
Christian Faulhammer wrote:
> [TeX stuff]
Along with this, if anyone wants to take a look at bug 118405[1], the
GDP could really use the help, especially since it was nattfodd who
first requested a TeX document in the first place. It's been sitting
there for a long time now, so unless someone writ
On Mon, 12 Mar 2007 17:57:09 +
Steve Long <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> And if you think the way you have carried on is anything approaching
> decent, you clearly haven't read the guidelines... Can we stop now
> please?
Based on a cursory view of my gentoo-dev folder, we had stopped for a
good
Seemant Kulleen wrote:
> Grow up.
>
SKulleen+=10 :P
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
>> Erm, to be precise here, noone has removed any ciaranm's attributions
>> from devmanual, they've all been moved to the end of the document
>> originally, so that people wouldn't be forced to scroll across one
>> page worth of contributors to get to the actual content of de
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
>> My own rules for netiquette are very simple: "Always be parliamentary;
>> never be personal; have a point to make; know when to stop".
>> 'Parliamentary' means 'follow the rules for MPs in Ottawa or
>> Westminster'.
>
> If you think that anything anyone's said in here isn
On Mon, 12 Mar 2007 17:46:41 + Steve Long
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Stephen Bennett wrote:
> > Chris Gianelloni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >> The EAPI=0 document was supposed to be a QA project. What it is
> >> now, I have no idea.
> >
> > A QA subproject which has not yet released
On Mon, 12 Mar 2007 17:46:41 +
Steve Long <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Except it's one that needs Paludis ready before it can be considered
> complete. /me thinks are they really that clever? /me remembers
> ciaranm's incredibly smart posts from ~2 years ago when he couldn't
> stand being trea
On Mon, 12 Mar 2007 17:53:10 + Steve Long
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Stephen Bennett wrote:
> >> Thing I don't understand is why spb took it on when he knew he was
> >> going to be out of commission with his Uni.
> >
> > I'm not out of commission. PMS is simply not at the top of my list
> >
On Mon, 12 Mar 2007 18:00:09 +
Steve Long <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yes so in a /technical/ sense he's the lead. You defer to his greater
> knowledge. Or are you more political than technical?
Nowhere did I say anything of the sort. Stop jumping to conclusions
based on incorrect assumption
Steve Long wrote: [Mon Mar 12 2007, 12:51:17PM CDT]
> Stephen Bennett wrote:
> > On Sat, 3 Mar 2007 01:58:30 -0800 (PST)
> > "Alec Warner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> And if we didn't give a d*mn about such a distinction? IOW if you were
> discussing this technically, instead of /politically/ *sho
On Mon, 12 Mar 2007 17:53:10 +
Steve Long <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Um I'm guessing that since you're at Uni, you knew you'd be in this
> situation at this stage of your course. I wonder at how someone
> clearly so gifted could have overlooked that matter when undertaking
> such a vital pro
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> Paludis is not a Gentoo project. There is no disagreement there. This
> discussion is about PMS, not Paludis.
>
Yes dear.
> Also note that the traditional "open up discussions and source to
> everyone straight away" alternative to eselect ended up being a hideous
> XML m
Daniel Robbins wrote:
> On 3/4/07, Ciaran McCreesh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> you've managed to launch groundless attacks against
>> me, a whole bunch of other Gentoo developers, the Council, the
>> Foundation and devrel.
>
> Well, I think it's a good thing to question whether the Council, the
Stephen Bennett wrote:
>> To co-lead a Gentoo project? You need to be a dev to do that. I
>> couldn't join any projects even as a member until I became a dev, and
>> I created the distro. You are effectively co-leading (likely leading)
>> PMS as a non-dev - worse than that, as someone who has been
Stephen Bennett wrote:
>> Thing I don't understand is why spb took it on when he knew he was
>> going to be out of commission with his Uni.
>
> I'm not out of commission. PMS is simply not at the top of my list of
> priorities at the moment.
Um I'm guessing that since you're at Uni, you knew you'
Stephen Bennett wrote:
> On Sat, 3 Mar 2007 01:58:30 -0800 (PST)
> "Alec Warner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> So you are saying you cannot see Daniel's point of view at all? That
>> Gentoo should perhaps have input on a specification whose goal is to
>> essentially define what a Gentoo Package
Stephen Bennett wrote:
> Chris Gianelloni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> The EAPI=0 document was supposed to be a QA project. What it is now,
>> I have no idea.
>
> A QA subproject which has not yet released a public draft.
>
And it doesn't concern you that after x months, Chris had no idea wha
Stephen Bennett wrote:
>> OK, but it appears that PMS is not hosted on Gentoo infrastructure,
>> and its development is not controlled by Gentoo. Therefore it is not a
>> Gentoo project, and therefore the Council, QA, etc. should not be
>> treating it if it is a Gentoo project.
>
> It's controlled
Hi all,
as nattfodd and ehmsen won't be working on TeX for Gentoo anymore, we
need one or more new maintainer/s. Primary goal is to bring a working
ebuild of TeXLive 2007 into Portage, as the current used and working
one (teTeX) is dead upstream. There is an effort of a user [1] which
could be a
51 matches
Mail list logo
