Re: [gentoo-dev] Client-serve flags (again ;) (was Re: New eclass: gkrellm-plugin)

2007-03-10 Thread Thomas Rösner
Hi, Robin H. Johnson wrote: Of the mysql tarball (23Mb to start), a full 40% belongs to the testcases and the documentation that they ship. Another 8% for the modified copy of BerkDB that they ship, and only then do we start getting really useful things. 12% for the things unique to the server,

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Something positive! (was Re: Client-serve flags (again ;))

2007-03-10 Thread Chris Gianelloni
On Sat, 2007-03-10 at 22:52 +, Jeff Rollin wrote: > Personally I find "you are/he/she/it/x,y,z is gay" statements/jokes > really lame. The topic matter doesn't seem to be relevant to anything > (beyond whom you might want to sleep with/marry, obviously) - does > being gay make you a better/wors

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Client-server flags (again ;) (was Re: New eclass: gkrellm-plugin)

2007-03-10 Thread Chris Gianelloni
On Sat, 2007-03-10 at 01:48 +, Steve Long wrote: > Thomas Rösner wrote: > >> Once we have USE-based dependencies across the board, then yes. Until > >> that time, we should really be building both client and server for *all* > >> packages. > > > > I can understand that rationale for the clien

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Something positive! (was Re: Client-serve flags (again ;))

2007-03-10 Thread Jeff Rollin
On 10/03/07, Stephen Bennett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Sat, 10 Mar 2007 22:06:21 +0100 Andrej Kacian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > BTW, I never understood why are certain people so touchy about > homosexuality, while others joke about it with their peers daily (and > very personally). The w

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Something positive! (was Re: Client-serve flags (again ;))

2007-03-10 Thread Stephen Bennett
On Sat, 10 Mar 2007 22:06:21 +0100 Andrej Kacian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > BTW, I never understood why are certain people so touchy about > homosexuality, while others joke about it with their peers daily (and > very personally). The whole exchange made me think of http://xkcd.com/c65.html --

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Something positive! (was Re: Client-serve flags (again ;))

2007-03-10 Thread Jeff Rollin
On 10/03/07, Ryan Hill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The people who get all bent out of shape about a simple joke like that > are either homosexual themselves (not a bad thing) or homophobes > (definitely a bad thing). Not only is this completely off-topic for a technical ml, but one of the most

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Something positive! (was Re: Client-serve flags (again ;))

2007-03-10 Thread Bryan Østergaard
On Sat, Mar 10, 2007 at 03:55:01PM -0600, Ryan Hill wrote: > > The people who get all bent out of shape about a simple joke like that > > are either homosexual themselves (not a bad thing) or homophobes > > (definitely a bad thing). > > Not only is this completely off-topic for a technical ml, but

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Something positive! (was Re: Client-serve flags (again ;))

2007-03-10 Thread Jeff Rollin
On 10/03/07, Andrej Kacian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Sat, 10 Mar 2007 12:28:29 -0600 Andrew Gaffney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Thing is that kinda stuff just puts ppl off; i've seen you carry on > > bugzilla but i always thought fair enough he's stressed and working on > > loads a bugs;

[gentoo-dev] Re: Something positive! (was Re: Client-serve flags (again ;))

2007-03-10 Thread Ryan Hill
> The people who get all bent out of shape about a simple joke like that > are either homosexual themselves (not a bad thing) or homophobes > (definitely a bad thing). Not only is this completely off-topic for a technical ml, but one of the most shockingly stupid things one could say in an interna

[gentoo-dev] Re: Re: Something positive! (was Re: Client-serve flags (again ;))

2007-03-10 Thread Steve Long
Andrew Gaffney wrote: > Andrej Kacian wrote: >> On Sat, 10 Mar 2007 12:28:29 -0600 >> Andrew Gaffney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Thing is that kinda stuff just puts ppl off; i've seen you carry on bugzilla but i always thought fair enough he's stressed and working on loads a bugs;

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Something positive! (was Re: Client-serve flags (again ;))

2007-03-10 Thread Andrew Gaffney
Andrej Kacian wrote: On Sat, 10 Mar 2007 12:28:29 -0600 Andrew Gaffney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Thing is that kinda stuff just puts ppl off; i've seen you carry on bugzilla but i always thought fair enough he's stressed and working on loads a bugs; if you really wanted to say that crap to me,

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Something positive! (was Re: Client-serve flags (again ;))

2007-03-10 Thread Andrej Kacian
On Sat, 10 Mar 2007 12:28:29 -0600 Andrew Gaffney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Thing is that kinda stuff just puts ppl off; i've seen you carry on > > bugzilla but i always thought fair enough he's stressed and working on > > loads a bugs; if you really wanted to say that crap to me, you could h

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Something positive! (was Re: Client-serve flags (again ;))

2007-03-10 Thread Andrew Gaffney
Steve Long wrote: Mike Frysinger wrote: Yay zmedico! Can I just say he's one of the coolest devs on irc that i've run into, and incredibly helpful to all. if you love him so much why dont you marry him ... i hear Massachusetts is OK -mike Jeez i'd expect that off others, not off you. For sham

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Something positive! (was Re: Client-serve flags (again ;))

2007-03-10 Thread Mike Doty
Steve Long wrote: Mike Frysinger wrote: Yay zmedico! Can I just say he's one of the coolest devs on irc that i've run into, and incredibly helpful to all. if you love him so much why dont you marry him ... i hear Massachusetts is OK -mike Jeez i'd expect that off others, not off you. For sham

[gentoo-dev] Re: Something positive! (was Re: Client-serve flags (again ;))

2007-03-10 Thread Steve Long
Mike Frysinger wrote: >> Yay zmedico! Can I just say he's one of the coolest devs on irc that i've >> run into, and incredibly helpful to all. > > if you love him so much why dont you marry him ... i hear Massachusetts is > OK -mike Jeez i'd expect that off others, not off you. For shame. Thing

Re: [gentoo-dev] Client-serve flags (again ;) (was Re: New eclass: gkrellm-plugin)

2007-03-10 Thread Robin H. Johnson
On Sat, Mar 10, 2007 at 03:11:02PM +0100, Thomas R?sner wrote: > Yes and no. The same applies to Postgres, and still they provide the > libs in an extra package. It just makes sense, how much of that 20M > mysql tarball is used by the client? It's like you'd have to dl apache > (four times) to g

[gentoo-dev] Re: How others handle bad behaviour on mailinglists

2007-03-10 Thread Duncan
Olivier Crête <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted [EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on Fri, 09 Mar 2007 11:06:49 -0500: > On Fri, 2007-09-03 at 15:57 +, Jeff Rollin wrote: >> >> Hahah, yes! - But /which/ House of Commons?! > > I believe none of them is a great example of civility... (at least ours

[gentoo-dev] Re: Something positive! (was Re: Client-serve flags (again ;))

2007-03-10 Thread Duncan
Steve Long <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted [EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on Sat, 10 Mar 2007 01:42:49 +: >> I've been planning to write a new dependency resolver for portage in >> order to solve some of the issues tracked by bug 155723. Now that >> portage-2.1.2.2 has been stabilized (for

Re: [gentoo-dev] Client-serve flags (again ;) (was Re: New eclass: gkrellm-plugin)

2007-03-10 Thread Thomas Rösner
Hi, Robin H. Johnson schrieb: On Sat, Mar 10, 2007 at 12:56:51AM +0100, Thomas R?sner wrote: I can understand that rationale for the client part, but which packages would depend on the server part of e.g. MySQL if they could? And building the server part to get the small client lib is a larg

Re: [gentoo-dev] Something positive! (was Re: Client-serve flags (again ;))

2007-03-10 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Friday 09 March 2007, Steve Long wrote: > Yay zmedico! Can I just say he's one of the coolest devs on irc that i've > run into, and incredibly helpful to all. if you love him so much why dont you marry him ... i hear Massachusetts is OK -mike pgp0tat4pN6Sn.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Ebuild syntax highlighting

2007-03-10 Thread Alexandre Buisse
On Fri, Mar 9, 2007 at 14:13:22 +0100, Christian Faulhammer wrote: > Steve Long <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > but I hacked together a syntax highlighting file for katepart (as > > used in kwrite and kate of course ;) based on the BASH one. You can > > d/l the first version from: http://phpfi.com/21