Thanks for the info; git does seem to have issues, going by the `GLEP'. bzr
looks nice, but I don't know enough about it. From what i've read on the ml
and the website it will reach 1.0 in ~March, but has issues eg with
cross-platform development and diff/ commit.
svn seems the most mature of the
On Tue, 2007-01-16 at 23:16 -0500, Doug Goldstein wrote:
> Howdy all,
Hey,
> Diego (Flameeyes) brings about a good point from bug #95867 [1]. An
> issue that's actually affected me at work with something I'm working on,
> so I was the perfect person to ask to press this forward.
>
>
> Basical
Howdy all,
Diego (Flameeyes) brings about a good point from bug #95867 [1]. An
issue that's actually affected me at work with something I'm working on,
so I was the perfect person to ask to press this forward.
Basically XDG_DATA_DIRS is where FreeDesktop has standardized the
location of ico
Greg KH wrote:
On Wed, Jan 17, 2007 at 01:53:12AM +0100, Markus Ullmann wrote:
I've talked to a friend of mine recently. He's a FreeBSD dev and he said
they tried git for their ports tree (which is basically the same what
we're talking about) and it was more or less a big pain for multiple
rea
On Wed, Jan 17, 2007 at 01:53:12AM +0100, Markus Ullmann wrote:
> I've talked to a friend of mine recently. He's a FreeBSD dev and he said
> they tried git for their ports tree (which is basically the same what
> we're talking about) and it was more or less a big pain for multiple
> reasons.
> H
Chris Gianelloni wrote:
> On Fri, 2007-01-12 at 09:22 -0700, Steve Dibb wrote:
>> Would that Changelog in profiles/ need to be updated for stuff
>> recursively as well? I made some changes to default-linux/amd64/ stuff,
>> but I added the changes to the ChangeLog for that directory.
>
> That wo
Steve Long schrieb:
I'm looking for a distributed SCM atm, and have come down to
git, bzr, svn or arch.
svn is centralized ;)
I'm leaning to git simply because it's used for the kernel, which seems
> like a project that would really stretch a VCS.
Well the kernel is quite large but doesn't
I wanted to write an ebuild for erlyweb because I think it's cool and
thought it would be proper gentoo-style to split of the dependencies
into different packages. I saw that there was a bit of duplicated code
and since AFAIK there's not much erlang stuff in portage I thought I'd
try to help out a
Robin H. Johnson wrote:
> My personal view (not infra) on it, is that I'm mostly negative about
> changing VCS at all - I would prefer not to change, because the status
> quo works very well as it is. If a change is going to be made, it should
> be taken as a chance to resolve as many different iss
On Sunday 14 January 2007 18:46, Chris Gianelloni wrote:
> On Fri, 2007-01-12 at 22:46 +, Stephen Bennett wrote:
> > On Fri, 12 Jan 2007 19:36:06 +
> >
> > Tristan Heaven <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > On Sat, 2007-01-13 at 00:53 +0900, Georgi Georgiev wrote:
> > > They have to be able to
On Friday 12 January 2007 22:35, Chris Gianelloni wrote:
> It has nothing to do with the sandbox. It's because /usr/games/lib
> isn't readable to people outside the "games" group.
Isn't that a rather silly restriction. What is there in /usr/games/lib that
may not be seen by people outside the gr
On Saturday 13 January 2007 05:17, Georgi Georgiev wrote:
>
> Something similar could be done about userpriv. Another red letter
> indicating that a package will compile as root (and the user is free to
> go ahead or abort as they see fit). The letter can be green if userpriv
> is not in FEATURES.
12 matches
Mail list logo