Petteri Räty wrote:
> It's my pleasure to introduce to you Robert "rbu" Buchholz.
Before it's too late, I wanted to send thanks to Jokey who was and is a
great mentor.
And also to all who sent greetings. Hope to see some of you at the next
German conspiracy meeting.
Robert
--
gentoo-dev@gento
Steve Long wrote:
> Robert Buchholz wrote:
>> The problem here is that one can not say when the whole tree is updated
>> to the new standard, because for the packages which were not touched, it
>> could mean that they needed no change or that they were not looked at yet.
> I can understand that as
Daniel Drake wrote:
> Hi,
>
> openmosix has been hardmasked for a long time:
>
> # Tim Yamin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (07 Aug 2006)
> # Security mask
> # Bugs #135167, #137623, #137626, #138617, #139321,
> # #139475, #139641, #140444, #141503, #142616, #142617
> sys-kernel/openmosix-sources
> sys-clus
On Monday 01 January 2007 12:46, Mike Doty wrote:
> Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > how do people feel about transitioning the Gentoo standard system logger
> > from running as root/root to adm/adm ? the latest version of sysklogd
> > includes some patches so that it can run as non-root and a user reque
On Monday 01 January 2007 15:12, Petteri Räty wrote:
> It already works in ~arch so will hit stable too sometime in the future.
until it completely works (versus just mostly works), why mention this ? it'd
be better to continue on with the 'dont use subshells' especially since it
hasnt really b
Hi,
openmosix has been hardmasked for a long time:
# Tim Yamin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (07 Aug 2006)
# Security mask
# Bugs #135167, #137623, #137626, #138617, #139321,
# #139475, #139641, #140444, #141503, #142616, #142617
sys-kernel/openmosix-sources
sys-cluster/openmosixview
sys-cluster/openmosix
Stephen Bennett wrote:
> On Mon, 01 Jan 2007 17:24:03 -0800
> Donnie Berkholz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Stephen Bennett wrote:
>>> The proposal means that all variables listed in USE_EXPAND get
>>> handled exactly as USE does where profile inheritance is concerned.
>>> Subprofiles can add to
On Mon, 01 Jan 2007 17:24:03 -0800
Donnie Berkholz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Stephen Bennett wrote:
> > The proposal means that all variables listed in USE_EXPAND get
> > handled exactly as USE does where profile inheritance is concerned.
> > Subprofiles can add to and remove from the value in
Thanks for the greetings from Czechoslovakia :-)
Jakub Moc wrote:
Petteri Räty napsal(a):
He hails from Beroun, Czech Republic. He owns his own IT company. On the
personal side he is married and has a little daughter. He likes soccer,
taking trips on bikes and hiking.
Yay, the Czech b
Stephen Bennett wrote:
> The proposal means that all variables listed in USE_EXPAND get handled
> exactly as USE does where profile inheritance is concerned. Subprofiles
> can add to and remove from the value in the parent profile just as they
> can for USE.
Did I misread what you said earlier?
S
On Mon, 01 Jan 2007 15:27:43 -0800
Donnie Berkholz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'd rather not make USE_EXPAND incremental if we can't subtract flags.
> At present, we accomplish that by simply resetting the whole thing in
> subprofiles. But the proposal seems to make impossible any subprofile
> o
On Mon, 01 Jan 2007 15:27:43 -0800 Donnie Berkholz
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| I'd rather not make USE_EXPAND incremental if we can't subtract flags.
You mean via -flag? Or via -*? Both are valid in incrementals.
--
Ciaran McCreesh
Mail: ciaranm at ciaranm.org
Web
Stephen Bennett wrote:
> On Mon, 01 Jan 2007 13:24:49 -0800
> Donnie Berkholz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> That means that the base profiles must have a minimal setting that is
>> added to in lower profiles, rather than a reasonable default that's
>> entirely reset in lower profiles (perhaps to
On Tue, 02 Jan 2007 00:40:55 +0200
Petteri Räty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It's my pleasure to introduce to you Miroslav "fordforg" Šulc. He is
> joining the über cool java people. Expect him to spend endless night
> battling with the horrors of bundled jars and sucky build systems.
Welcome abo
Jakub Moc schrieb:
> Yay, the Czech beer conspiracy is growing! Welcome!
You'd share your beer? :D
Jokey
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
Petteri Räty napsal(a):
> He hails from Beroun, Czech Republic. He owns his own IT company. On the
> personal side he is married and has a little daughter. He likes soccer,
> taking trips on bikes and hiking.
Yay, the Czech beer conspiracy is growing! Welcome!
*plop*
--
Best regards,
Jakub M
Robert Buchholz wrote:
> A problem package would be one that does not need a C compiler. It can't
> be distinguished from the one which was not yet changed to depend on C.
>
> The problem here is that one can not say when the whole tree is updated
> to the new standard, because for the packages wh
It's my pleasure to introduce to you Miroslav "fordforg" Šulc. He is
joining the über cool java people. Expect him to spend endless night
battling with the horrors of bundled jars and sucky build systems.
He hails from Beroun, Czech Republic. He owns his own IT company. On the
personal side he is
On Mon, 01 Jan 2007 13:24:49 -0800
Donnie Berkholz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> That means that the base profiles must have a minimal setting that is
> added to in lower profiles, rather than a reasonable default that's
> entirely reset in lower profiles (perhaps to a smaller setting),
> correct?
Donnie Berkholz wrote:
I'm not a huge fan of that, if that's what it requires, since there is
no way of subtracting USE_EXPAND settings that I know about.
Ability to subtract comes with incremental stacking, which I think we
are talking about here, at least I hope so.
--
Kind Regards,
Simon
Stephen Bennett wrote:
> Following a discussion in #gentoo-portage earlier this evening, it was
> suggested that I send out an RFC email for this. So, does anyone object
> to requiring that any variable listed in USE_EXPAND be treated as
> incremental, at least as far as profile inheritance is conc
Ciaran McCreesh kirjoitti:
> On Mon, 01 Jan 2007 22:28:10 +0200 Petteri Räty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> | Ciaran McCreesh kirjoitti:
> | > On Mon, 01 Jan 2007 22:12:09 +0200 Petteri Räty
> | > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> | > | It already works in ~arch so will hit stable too sometime in the
>
Following a discussion in #gentoo-portage earlier this evening, it was
suggested that I send out an RFC email for this. So, does anyone object
to requiring that any variable listed in USE_EXPAND be treated as
incremental, at least as far as profile inheritance is concerned?
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.or
On Mon, 01 Jan 2007 22:28:10 +0200 Petteri Räty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
| Ciaran McCreesh kirjoitti:
| > On Mon, 01 Jan 2007 22:12:09 +0200 Petteri Räty
| > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| > | It already works in ~arch so will hit stable too sometime in the
| > | future.
| >
| > Better to say, you
Ciaran McCreesh kirjoitti:
> On Mon, 01 Jan 2007 22:12:09 +0200 Petteri Räty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> | It already works in ~arch so will hit stable too sometime in the
> | future.
>
> Better to say, you might soon be able to get away with it, but don't
> rely upon it actually working...
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, 01 Jan 2007 10:51:56 -0500
Seemant Kulleen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Betelgeuse,
>
> I'll take sqlite if you and I can co-maintain it.
>
> Thanks,
> --
> Seemant Kulleen
> Developer, Gentoo Linux
>
> --
> gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing
On Mon, 01 Jan 2007 22:12:09 +0200 Petteri Räty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
| It already works in ~arch so will hit stable too sometime in the
| future.
Better to say, you might soon be able to get away with it, but don't
rely upon it actually working...
--
Ciaran McCreesh
Mail: c
It already works in ~arch so will hit stable too sometime in the future.
Regards,
Petteri R=C3=A4ty
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On Mon, 1 Jan 2007 20:14:17 +0100 "Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| On Monday 01 January 2007 19:38, Petteri Räty wrote:
| > Why not use the wheel group?
|
| wheel can su (and sudo usually); you might want to give an user
| access to the logs without using wheel group.
Then
On Monday 01 January 2007 19:38, Petteri Räty wrote:
> Why not use the wheel group?
wheel can su (and sudo usually); you might want to give an user access to the
logs without using wheel group.
--
Diego "Flameeyes" Pettenò - http://farragut.flameeyes.is-a-geek.org/
Gentoo/Alt lead, Gentoo/FreeBS
Petteri Räty wrote:
> Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò kirjoitti:
>> It would be really nice, especially if the adm group could be used to be
>> able
>> to read the logs without using root login :)
> Why not use the wheel group?
adm is the standard unix group used to access system logs. there's a
few
Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò kirjoitti:
> On Monday 01 January 2007 10:29, Mike Frysinger wrote:
>> how do people feel about transitioning the Gentoo standard system logger
>> from running as root/root to adm/adm ? the latest version of sysklogd
>> includes some patches so that it can run as non-ro
On Mon, 01 Jan 2007 09:46:55 -0800
Mike Doty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> does syslog-ng and metalog have similar functionality?
SYNOPSIS
syslog-ng [ -dFsvVy ] [ -f ] [ -p
] [ -C ] [ -u ] [ -g ]
...
-u , --group=
Switch to user.
I'd have to guess so.
--
gento
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Mike Frysinger wrote:
> how do people feel about transitioning the Gentoo standard system logger from
> running as root/root to adm/adm ? the latest version of sysklogd includes
> some patches so that it can run as non-root and a user requested we m
Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò wrote:
On Monday 01 January 2007 10:29, Mike Frysinger wrote:
how do people feel about transitioning the Gentoo standard system logger
from running as root/root to adm/adm ? the latest version of sysklogd
includes some patches so that it can run as non-root and a use
Betelgeuse,
I'll take sqlite if you and I can co-maintain it.
Thanks,
--
Seemant Kulleen
Developer, Gentoo Linux
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò wrote:
> It would be really nice, especially if the adm group could be used to be able
> to read the logs without using root login :)
++ on that :)
Greetz Jokey
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
On Monday 01 January 2007 10:29, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> how do people feel about transitioning the Gentoo standard system logger
> from running as root/root to adm/adm ? the latest version of sysklogd
> includes some patches so that it can run as non-root and a user requested
> we make this the
Steve Long wrote:
> Alec Warner wrote:
>> Er, his point being that if you don't do the upgrade all at once, you
>> have two classes of package.
>>
>> 1. Packages that don't require C-compiler
>> 2. Packages that don't yet depend upon C-compiler
>>
>> When doing the upgrade over a period of time the
As arj is retiring (https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=51665)
the following list of packages are still without a maintainer:
dev-db/sqlite
dev-db/sqliteodbc
dev-util/archway
dev-util/bazaar
dev-util/tla
If you dec
This is your monthly friendly reminder ! Same bat time (typically the
2nd Thursday at 2000 UTC), same bat channel (#gentoo-council @
irc.freenode.net) !
If you have something you'd wish for us to chat about, maybe even
vote on, let us know ! Simply reply to this e-mail for the whole
Gentoo dev l
Alec Warner wrote:
>>> The tricky part then is figuring out whether something doesn't dep upon
>>> c-compiler because it doesn't need one or because the ebuilds haven't
>>> been updated.
>>>
>> I'm out of my depth here- I can't see where that would be a problem?
>>
>
> Er, his point being that if
how do people feel about transitioning the Gentoo standard system logger from
running as root/root to adm/adm ? the latest version of sysklogd includes
some patches so that it can run as non-root and a user requested we make this
the default ... however, i certainly dont want to start adding a
43 matches
Mail list logo
