Re: [gentoo-dev] New Bugday lead!

2006-12-07 Thread Alexander Færøy
On Thu, Dec 07, 2006 at 10:32:04PM +0200, Petteri Räty wrote: > > Congratulations. > > Regards, > Petteri > Thanks a lot. If you guys are interested in bugday project, then have a look at this thread: https://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-t-522662.html Best regards, Alexander -- Alexander Færø

Re: [gentoo-dev] New Bugday lead!

2006-12-07 Thread Petteri Räty
Bryan Østergaard kirjoitti: > Hi all. > > It's a pleassure to announce Alexander Færøy (eroyf) as the new Bugday > lead. He's been working hard the last several months to improve the > Bugday project. I'm sure he'll be able to carry on the project and get > lots of new, exciting ideas rolling. >

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: spamc standalone package

2006-12-07 Thread Enrico Weigelt
* Ryan Hill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb: > Enrico Weigelt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > is anyone else working on an standalone spamc package ? > > I've got several machines where I don't want to have the whole > > spamassassin installed - they're just calling an remote machine > > to do this w

Re: [gentoo-dev] (open|strong)swan ipsec-config-path

2006-12-07 Thread Alin Năstac
Lars Weiler wrote: > * Alin Năstac <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [06/12/07 08:37 +0200]: > >> I think strongswan's ebuild should be simplified. >> I will bump openswan to 2.4.7 in a couple of days. Please use it as >> starting point for your bump. >> > > While we are at it: Should we keep installing

[gentoo-dev] (open|strong)swan ipsec-config-path (was: Re: net-misc/openswan needs a maintainer)

2006-12-07 Thread Lars Weiler
* Alin Năstac <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [06/12/07 08:37 +0200]: > I think strongswan's ebuild should be simplified. > I will bump openswan to 2.4.7 in a couple of days. Please use it as > starting point for your bump. While we are at it: Should we keep installing the config into /etc/ipsec/ and create s

Re: [gentoo-dev] net-misc/openswan needs a maintainer

2006-12-07 Thread Lars Weiler
* Alin Năstac <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [06/12/07 08:37 +0200]: > I think strongswan's ebuild should be simplified. Yep. I looked into it this morning. A lot of checks from the time before we had linux-info.eclass. Starting from scratch might be an option ;-) Regards, Lars -- Lars Weiler <[EMAIL