Mike Doty wrote:
Alec Warner wrote:
Just make you aware, not everyone follows portage development and its
bound to bite some people in the ass (although I expect the users will
notice the most).
Recently commited to svn (but afaik released only in ~arch) is code to
prevent the sourcing of eb
Alec Warner wrote:
Just make you aware, not everyone follows portage development and its
bound to bite some people in the ass (although I expect the users will
notice the most).
Recently commited to svn (but afaik released only in ~arch) is code to
prevent the sourcing of ebuilds with no mani
Just make you aware, not everyone follows portage development and its
bound to bite some people in the ass (although I expect the users will
notice the most).
Recently commited to svn (but afaik released only in ~arch) is code to
prevent the sourcing of ebuilds with no manifest. Thus ebuilds
Vitaly Oborsky wrote:
> Good afternoon. Gentoo it is the best. You know it:) the Question. In
> potrage there is such remarkable package as asterisk. Its newest
> version at present 1.2. X. Several months ago there was a stable new
> branch asterisk, with number of version 1.4. X, me interests, whe
> potrage there is such remarkable package as asterisk. Its newest
> version at present 1.2. X. Several months ago there was a stable new
> branch asterisk, with number of version 1.4. X, me interests, whether
1.4 Branch is in beta stage.
> inclusion of this version in portage is planned? If yes,
On Sat, Dec 02, 2006 at 12:56:59AM +0100, Jan 'RedBully' Seiffert wrote:
> OK, then maybe someone knows how to get ALSA-Devices in an persistent
> ordering with udev-rules?
> I was unable to find it out by my self, the documentation is a little
> sparse on this IMHO...
Just figure out something un
