On Sunday 05 November 2006 22:42, Matthias Langer wrote:
> however, someone should adapt media-video/mjpegtools-1.8.0-r1
> (see bug 154199)
and someone should search for duplicates before filing bugs
-mike
pgpNoUcD7VsLM.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Sunday 05 November 2006 10:00, Alin Nastac wrote:
>
>> Mike Frysinger wrote:
>>
>>> On Sunday 05 November 2006 07:36, Jakub Moc wrote:
>>>
I'd like to resubmit it to the council... :/
>>> not until it pans out with infra
>>>
>> Now
John Jawed wrote:
> At larger sizes the loading the initrd would actually cause a kernel
> panic on pivoting root...whether this was a result of a kernel config,
> a set maximum size limit, or something else I'm not exactly sure of.
Yes, there's a hardcoded limit in the kernel config that you can
On Sun, 2006-11-05 at 02:26 -0500, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> upstream says it's dead and they dont want people using it ... considering
> the
> problems we've seen that sounds just peachy
fine ... however, someone should adapt media-video/mjpegtools-1.8.0-r1
(see bug 154199)
thanks,
matthias
--
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> On Mon, 30 Oct 2006 19:21:46 +0100 Piotr Jaroszyński <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> | > And it doesn't work.
> |
> | Wanna bet? Of course you must put it in the x-modular.eclass, but I
> | thought that's quite obvious as spyderous was talking about adding
> | IUSE="" to tha
Ryan Tandy wrote:
> Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
>> On Sun, 05 Nov 2006 01:35:43 -0800 Peter Gordon
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> | On Wed, 2006-11-01 at 08:40 +, Mike Frysinger wrote:
>> | > If you have something you'd wish for us to chat about, maybe even
>> | > vote on, let us know ! Simply re
Tach Christian, 0x2B859DE3 (PGP-PK-ID)
Christian Heim schrieb:
> Its my pleasure to introduce to you Hans de Graaff (also known as
> graaff), our latest addition helping with emacs/xemacs.
Hmm, I think he just wants XEmacs, you know it is like Gnome/KDE. :)
>
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Sun, 05 Nov 2006 01:35:43 -0800 Peter Gordon
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| On Wed, 2006-11-01 at 08:40 +, Mike Frysinger wrote:
| > If you have something you'd wish for us to chat about, maybe even
| > vote on, let us know ! Simply reply to this e-mail for the whole
Look into INSTALL_MASK.
--Brian Jackson
On Nov 5, 2006, at 12:02 PM, John Jawed wrote:
Two patches which allow a user to bypass files created with doman and
dodoc in FEATURES:
FEATURES="noman nodoc" emerge -av foo
http://jawed.name/dev/gentoo/nodoc.patch
http://jawed.name/dev/gentoo/noman.p
On Sunday 05 November 2006 10:00, Alin Nastac wrote:
> Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > On Sunday 05 November 2006 07:36, Jakub Moc wrote:
> >> I'd like to resubmit it to the council... :/
> >
> > not until it pans out with infra
>
> Now would be a good time to bring the problem before the council?
> It h
Ah yep, missed it. Nevermind my chatter :-)
On 11/5/06, Tobias Scherbaum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Am Sonntag, den 05.11.2006, 20:08 +0100 schrieb Christian Heim:
> On Sunday, 05. November. 2006 19:02, John Jawed wrote:
> > Two patches which allow a user to bypass files created with doman and
>
Mike Frysinger wrote:
> upstream says it's dead and they dont want people using it ... considering
> the
> problems we've seen that sounds just peachy
>
> p.masked now
> -mike
oh thank god.
--
by design, by neglect
[EMAIL PROTECTED]for a fac
Am Sonntag, den 05.11.2006, 20:08 +0100 schrieb Christian Heim:
> On Sunday, 05. November. 2006 19:02, John Jawed wrote:
> > Two patches which allow a user to bypass files created with doman and
> > dodoc in FEATURES:
> >
> > FEATURES="noman nodoc" emerge -av foo
> >
> > http://jawed.name/dev/gento
On Sunday, 05. November. 2006 19:02, John Jawed wrote:
> Two patches which allow a user to bypass files created with doman and
> dodoc in FEATURES:
>
> FEATURES="noman nodoc" emerge -av foo
>
> http://jawed.name/dev/gentoo/nodoc.patch
> http://jawed.name/dev/gentoo/noman.patch
Err, isn't current p
Two patches which allow a user to bypass files created with doman and
dodoc in FEATURES:
FEATURES="noman nodoc" emerge -av foo
http://jawed.name/dev/gentoo/nodoc.patch
http://jawed.name/dev/gentoo/noman.patch
Quick background/inspiration:
I found myself having to make an initrd suitable to do
On Sun, 2006-11-05 at 04:57 -0500, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> i dont see anyone talking to infra about it so why dont you start there
> -mike
Will do. Thanks, Mike.
--
Peter Gordon (codergeek42)
Gentoo Forums Global Moderator
GnuPG Public Key ID: 0xFFC19479 / Fingerprint:
DD68 A414 56BD 6368 D957
On Sun, Nov 05, 2006 at 06:47:07PM +0300, Peter Volkov (pva) wrote:
> Hello.
>
> Short question: What shall we use to link libraries/programs: gcc or ld?
> Why?
>
> A bit longer story: I have a problem during linking of wepattack on
> amd64 systems. Linking stage issues warning:
>
> $ x86_64-pc-
On 2006.11.03 19:15, Jon Portnoy wrote:
I've been mostly inactive for a good while but hanging on mostly for
sentimentality's sake, it's past time for that to stop.
[snip]
Later. It's been fun, it's been real, but it hasn't been real fun. :)
I'll be around #gentoo/#-dev.
--
Jon Portnoy
aven
Mike Frysinger wrote:
i use/maintain metalog myself and thus could care less about sysklogd ...
anyone out there care enough to fixup bugs for it ?
-mike
Oh noes! my beloved logger!
I'll try and take a look at it.
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
Hello.
Short question: What shall we use to link libraries/programs: gcc or ld?
Why?
A bit longer story: I have a problem during linking of wepattack on
amd64 systems. Linking stage issues warning:
$ x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-ld -o wepattack wepattack.o rc4.o wepfilter.o
log.o modes.o misc.o verify.o
Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Sunday 05 November 2006 07:36, Jakub Moc wrote:
>
>> I'd like to resubmit it to the council... :/
>>
>
> not until it pans out with infra
>
Now would be a good time to bring the problem before the council?
It has been permanently closed as WONTFIX by klieber (
On Sunday 05 November 2006 07:36, Jakub Moc wrote:
> I'd like to resubmit it to the council... :/
not until it pans out with infra
-mike
pgpwXZzS8iG6Y.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Alin Nastac napsal(a):
> Mike Frysinger wrote:
>> On Sunday 05 November 2006 05:39, Alin Nastac wrote:
>>
>>> Mike Frysinger wrote:
>>>
that's nice, but again, why arent these being directed to infra ?
>>> It could be considered as organization policy, so I assumed council
Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Sunday 05 November 2006 05:39, Alin Nastac wrote:
>
>> Mike Frysinger wrote:
>>
>>> that's nice, but again, why arent these being directed to infra ?
>>>
>> It could be considered as organization policy, so I assumed council had
>> to be involved in this de
On Sun, 05 Nov 2006 02:23:02 -0800
David Shakaryan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> > Wow. That's about the pettiest and least relevant thing you could ask
> > them to discuss. Why not ask for a vote on what colour the soft
> > icecream machine should be whilst you're at it?
>
On Sunday 05 November 2006 05:39, Alin Nastac wrote:
> Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > that's nice, but again, why arent these being directed to infra ?
>
> It could be considered as organization policy, so I assumed council had
> to be involved in this decision.
it isnt ... so file a bug for infra
-mik
Mike Frysinger wrote:
> that's nice, but again, why arent these being directed to infra ?
>
It could be considered as organization policy, so I assumed council had
to be involved in this decision.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
i use/maintain metalog myself and thus could care less about sysklogd ...
anyone out there care enough to fixup bugs for it ?
-mike
pgppt0uPrJxOp.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Sunday 05 November 2006 04:50, Alin Nastac wrote:
> Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > If you have something you'd wish for us to chat about, maybe even
> > vote on, let us know ! Simply reply to this e-mail for the whole
> > Gentoo dev list to see.
>
> I have a problem with our current SPF record. I wa
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> Wow. That's about the pettiest and least relevant thing you could ask
> them to discuss. Why not ask for a vote on what colour the soft
> icecream machine should be whilst you're at it?
Silly analogy.
> Clearly this is one of those easy to understand issues where everyone
Alin Nastac napsal(a):
> Mike Frysinger wrote:
>> If you have something you'd wish for us to chat about, maybe even
>> vote on, let us know ! Simply reply to this e-mail for the whole
>> Gentoo dev list to see.
>>
> I have a problem with our current SPF record. I wanna see a +all in this
> reco
On Sunday 05 November 2006 10:59, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> On Sun, 05 Nov 2006 01:35:43 -0800 Peter Gordon
> Clearly this is one of those easy to understand issues where everyone
> has an opinion, and rather than fix their mail client or behaviour they
> try to have a huge debate about it... Don't
On Sun, 05 Nov 2006 01:35:43 -0800 Peter Gordon
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| On Wed, 2006-11-01 at 08:40 +, Mike Frysinger wrote:
| > If you have something you'd wish for us to chat about, maybe even
| > vote on, let us know ! Simply reply to this e-mail for the whole
| > Gentoo dev list to se
On Sunday 05 November 2006 04:35, Peter Gordon wrote:
> I have one item that I would like to see addressed in the next possible
> council meeting: The reply behavior of gentoo-core messages. What's
> happening is that gentoo-core appears to have no default Reply-To header
> set.
i dont see anyone
Mike Frysinger wrote:
> If you have something you'd wish for us to chat about, maybe even
> vote on, let us know ! Simply reply to this e-mail for the whole
> Gentoo dev list to see.
>
I have a problem with our current SPF record. I wanna see a +all in this
record for 2 reasons:
a) SPF is rea
On Wed, 2006-11-01 at 08:40 +, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> If you have something you'd wish for us to chat about, maybe even
> vote on, let us know ! Simply reply to this e-mail for the whole
> Gentoo dev list to see.
I have one item that I would like to see addressed in the next possible
council
36 matches
Mail list logo
