Jon Portnoy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted
[EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on Fri, 03
Nov 2006 14:15:58 -0500:
> I've been mostly inactive for a good while but hanging on mostly for
> sentimentality's sake, it's past time for that to stop.
>
> I mostly only maintain a small handful of ebuilds, I
Caleb Cushing wrote:
> maybe it would be a lot of work. to even develop the tools. but it
> would be nice if a global use flag could have a detailed option.
this has been discussed a few times before. i think there's even a bug
for it (don't remember the #).
> example.
>
> euse -i mplayer [+
Jon Portnoy wrote:
> I've been mostly inactive for a good while but hanging on mostly for
> sentimentality's sake, it's past time for that to stop.
Thanks for everything, Jon. You've been a great friend and will continue
to be. That's more meaningful than any of the work we've done.
Donnie
si
On Friday 03 November 2006 20:15, Jon Portnoy wrote:
> I've been mostly inactive for a good while but hanging on mostly for
> sentimentality's sake, it's past time for that to stop.
>
> I mostly only maintain a small handful of ebuilds, I'm sure they can
> find proper homes quickly. None are mainte
Tach Seemant, 0x2B859DE3 (PGP-PK-ID)
Seemant Kulleen schrieb:
> Wow, this retirement f*cks me up some, I have to say. I'll give you a
> better send off on the planet blogs, because for now I'm still reeling
> from the news.
Hey, you could write a praise for new
Jon Portnoy wrote:
> I've been mostly inactive for a good while but hanging on mostly for
> sentimentality's sake, it's past time for that to stop.
>
> I mostly only maintain a small handful of ebuilds, I'm sure they can
> find proper homes quickly. None are maintenance-intensive.
>
> And of co
Wow, this retirement f*cks me up some, I have to say. I'll give you a
better send off on the planet blogs, because for now I'm still reeling
from the news.
I'll miss you, that's for sure.
--
Seemant Kulleen
Developer, Gentoo Linux
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
On Fri, Nov 03, 2006 at 02:15:58PM -0500, Jon Portnoy wrote:
> I've been mostly inactive for a good while but hanging on mostly for
> sentimentality's sake, it's past time for that to stop.
>
> I mostly only maintain a small handful of ebuilds, I'm sure they can
> find proper homes quickly. None
On Fri, Nov 03, 2006 at 02:15:58PM -0500, Jon Portnoy wrote:
> And of course, the only thing anyone is really concerned about; robbat2
> has already laid claim to fortune-mod-gentoo-dev ;)
Good to hear the really important packages are in good hands. :-)
> Later. It's been fun, it's been real, b
I've been mostly inactive for a good while but hanging on mostly for
sentimentality's sake, it's past time for that to stop.
I mostly only maintain a small handful of ebuilds, I'm sure they can
find proper homes quickly. None are maintenance-intensive.
And of course, the only thing anyone is re
On Friday 03 November 2006 08:29, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> so to recap, the fix here changes it back to the historically documented
> behavior that the implicit RDEPEND happens in ebuilds regardless of what
> eclasses do
Fine by me, that would probably solve quite a bit of problems (and although I
On Fri, 3 Nov 2006 02:29:45 -0500
Mike Frysinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> so to recap, the fix here changes it back to the historically
> documented behavior that the implicit RDEPEND happens in ebuilds
> regardless of what eclasses do
Do it please. The current behaviour is retarded however y
Hi everyone,
sci-biology/cbcanalyzer no longer compiles on any of my systems (bug #153881).
It is unmaintained and I have no interest in fixing it. It has been
package.mask'ed for a while and no one noticed. Unless someone is interested
in fixing the bug and maintaining the package in the futur
Josh,
As you recall, I discussed problems with \use{fontspec} in xelatex
with you earlier. I am copying gettoo-dev@ on the off chance other
people are playing with xelatex, too. People who have no idea what I am
talking about might as well stop reading now.
The difficulty is that fontspec in
Steve Long wrote: [Fri Nov 03 2006, 02:47:52AM CST]
> I appreciate that many will be against this idea, but I'd still like to
> discuss it: a binary repository for gentoo.
>
> Yes, I know gentoo is a meta-distro. And that there isn't loads of
> bandwidth. That's easily got round.
It is?
> The
On Friday 03 November 2006 03:47, Steve Long wrote:
> If gentoo is still serious about enterprise adoption
Gentoo as an entire whole is not really "serious" about anything
last i checked, it was the "server" project who was working on the
whole "enterprise" thing ... those guys are serious about
On Friday 03 November 2006 03:23, Brian Harring wrote:
> so...
so... start a new thread exactly like i told you so :P
-mike
pgpPwyBBW87wn.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Friday 03 November 2006 04:32, Peter Volkov (pva) wrote:
> On 2006-11-03 at 00:43 -0800, Zac Medico wrote:
> > Also, some ebuilds will loose some implicit RDEPEND that they current
> > get from eclasses.
>
> I suppose more logical solution is to adjoin DEPEND from ebuild and
> RDEPEND from eclas
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Peter Volkov (pva) wrote:
> On 2006-11-03 at 00:43 -0800, Zac Medico wrote:
>> Also, some ebuilds will loose some implicit RDEPEND that they current
>> get from eclasses.
>
> Why? I suppose more logical solution is to adjoin DEPEND from ebuild and
> R
On 2006-11-03 at 00:43 -0800, Zac Medico wrote:
> Also, some ebuilds will loose some implicit RDEPEND that they current
> get from eclasses.
Why? I suppose more logical solution is to adjoin DEPEND from ebuild and
RDEPEND from eclass.
Peter.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Mike Frysinger wrote:
> this is not a "implicit vs explicit" thread; if you want that discussion
> start
> your own
>
> we've said the relationship of DEPEND atoms in ebuilds should be independent
> of the DEPEND atoms found in eclasses as logicall
Mike Frysinger wrote:
> If you have something you'd wish for us to chat about, maybe even
> vote on, let us know ! Simply reply to this e-mail for the whole
> Gentoo dev list to see.
>
I appreciate that many will be against this idea, but I'd still like to
discuss it: a binary repository for gen
On Fri, Nov 03, 2006 at 02:29:45AM -0500, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> this is not a "implicit vs explicit" thread; if you want that discussion
> start
> your own
That discussion (dropping it to explicit, as has been discussed often
enough) should be started off again since fixing it isn't exactly a
23 matches
Mail list logo
