Tim Yamin wrote:
> Lately however, the "fun" and the motivation just hasn't been there
> for the reasons I've outlined above; it's finally taken its toll, and
> I believe the time to move onto new projects and ventures has finally
> come for me.
>
> I would like to wish all of you the very best, a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Andrew Gaffney wrote:
> Are you proposing just adding the support or creating the new profiles
> as well? If it's just the support, adding it into portage now certainly
> won't hurt anything (unless someone really fscks up the current
> single-parent c
I killed my dev box somehow and due to recent meandering thoughts in my
head I've decided not to buy replacement parts. This in turn affects my
ability to do Gentoo work; so I have decided to take a leave of absence.
It's kind of been in my mind for while.
Treecleaners, I will talk to you a
Zac Medico wrote:
Some of you may recall that I proposed the addition of multiple
inheritance to profiles a couple of months ago [1]. The idea is to
extend the "parent" file in profiles so that it supports any number
of parents (one per line). Parents listed closer to the bottom of
the file wil
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi everyone,
Some of you may recall that I proposed the addition of multiple
inheritance to profiles a couple of months ago [1]. The idea is to
extend the "parent" file in profiles so that it supports any number
of parents (one per line). Parents li
Thomas Cort wrote:
There have been a number of developers leaving Gentoo in the past 6
months as well as a number of news stories on DistroWatch, Slashdot,
LWN, and others about Gentoo's internal problems. No one seems to have
pin pointed the problem, but it seems glaringly obvious to me. We
simp
On Thu, 05 Oct 2006 10:06:39 +0200
Natanael Copa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Because of gentoo devs always seems to fight?
Don't get confused by all the flames. It's only 10-20 devs out of ~150 who are
always fighting - and that's usually only on mailinglists, they work together
quite well outsi
Hi, I think it's time for me to resign as a Gentoo developer.
No bad blood or anything like that, I just realized that after being very
active during 2005, in the last months I couldn't find time anymore for
Gentoo development.
Also, a month ago I moved from Italy to Los Angeles to work at UCLA (
please remember that using USE=static to control whether static libraries are
installed is wrong
packages that can install static and shared libraries should always be
installing them
-mike
pgpHHzEifWBaO.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Sat, Oct 07, 2006 at 09:19:14PM +, Tim Yamin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> All,
>
> I'm afraid that I find that my position with Gentoo is no longer
> tenable. Over the past year and especially over the past few months
>
Sorry to see you leave.
Good luck.
tomaw.
>
pgpsUI71BNcK3.pgp
D
Hi Tim,
Am Samstag, 7. Oktober 2006 23:19 schrieb Tim Yamin:
> I'm afraid that I find that my position with Gentoo is no longer
> tenable. Over the past year and especially over the past few months
> the ability to keep Gentoo a coherent and smooth environment has been
> eroded and hindered at pra
Tim Yamin wrote:
So long, and thanks for all the fish...
Tim.
Well, I've already given you my best wishes for the future, but it can't
hurt to do it twice :P
Have fun doing whatever it is you'll be doing with yourself
Take care,
Peter Weller
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
On 2006.10.07 22:19, Tim Yamin wrote:
All,
[snip]
So long, and thanks for all the fish...
Tim.
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
Tim,
I'm sorry to see you depart.
Good luck for the future, see you around on irc.
Regards,
Roy Bamford
(NeddySeagoon)
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing
Tim Yamin wrote:
I would like to wish all of you the very best, and would like to thank
all of you who have (and haven't) made my time here so enjoyable.
So long, and thanks for all the fish...
I can't say this was unexpected, but I'm sorry to see you go. Are you going to
continue to contribu
Hi Tim,
On 10/7/06, Tim Yamin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I would like to wish all of you the very best, and would like to thank
all of you who have (and haven't) made my time here so enjoyable.
All the very best with whatever you do next. It's been a real
pleasure working with you on Gentoo,
All,
I'm afraid that I find that my position with Gentoo is no longer
tenable. Over the past year and especially over the past few months
the ability to keep Gentoo a coherent and smooth environment has been
eroded and hindered at practically every opportunity by bad decisions,
staff, and in some
Hi,
it has been a pleasure to work with you through bugzilla. I am really glad
you are a developer now - I will not have to commit anything for you
anymore now ;)
Best regards,
- Stefan
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
On Sat, 2006-10-07 at 09:58 +0100, Roy Bamford wrote:
> I replied in your part of the thread because Release Engineering are
> the obvious users of the mooted plans and reports.
That was kinda my point. We aren't. We really don't care what version
of Gnome/KDE/kernel get in the release. We ju
On Fri, 2006-10-06 at 22:58 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Friday 06 October 2006 19:11, Chris Gianelloni wrote:
> > So we'll need to update the no-nptl profiles to be ~sys-libs/glibc-2.4
> > instead of >=sys-libs/glibc-2.4, obviously, but will there be any other
> > changes necessary?
>
> i do
On 2006.10.07 00:26, Chris Gianelloni wrote:
On Fri, 2006-10-06 at 10:24 +0100, Roy Bamford wrote:
> Before you can have useful reports, you need a plan to report
against.
> Like a target date for 2007.0 and its contents. Such a plan depends
on
> other projects delivering the contents in accor
20 matches
Mail list logo
