On Tuesday 19 September 2006 19:32, Thomas Cort wrote:
> Stuart Herbert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > [1] http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/seeds/
>
> Why is this being done as a top level project instead of as a subproject
> of Release Engineering?
why does it need to be part of releng ? GNAP does
On Tuesday 19 September 2006 02:20, Alec Warner wrote:
> Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > On Monday 18 September 2006 21:12, Chris Gianelloni wrote:
> >> I would prefer that we add this into a new release profile and move it
> >> "up" the profile inheritance tree as the non-acl profiles get
> >> deprecate
On Tue, 19 Sep 2006 20:00:59 +0100
Stuart Herbert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [1] http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/seeds/
Why is this being done as a top level project instead of as a subproject
of Release Engineering?
-Thomas
pgpNbVfRl5I2l.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Wed, 2006-09-20 at 00:56 +0200, Carsten Lohrke wrote:
> First step should imho be, that you work with the Portage team on having
> proper set support implemented. Current meta ebuilds do suck, really.
No need for meta ebuilds...stage4 specs + catalyst.
--Dan
signature.asc
Description: This
First step should imho be, that you work with the Portage team on having
proper set support implemented. Current meta ebuilds do suck, really.
Carsten
pgpY3uwbpcikw.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Matthew Marlowe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted
[EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on Tue, 19 Sep 2006
01:05:52 -0700:
>> I've created a new project, called Gentoo Seeds [1]. The aim of the
>> project is to create stage4 tarballs which can be used to 'seed' new boxes
>> with ready-built Gentoo solut
Hi,
Am Donnerstag, den 10.08.2006, 19:50 +0200 schrieb Jeroen Roovers:
[...]
> On a minor note, I'd also like to see bug reporters use canonical
> package names in bug descriptions, including the category (and
> preferably the specific version, not some >=foo-3*!!!one, not to
> mention specifying
Hi,
net-im/ohphone has just entered package.mask and will be removed after
30 days because I've lost interest in the package a year or so ago and
no one has stepped up to take it.
A possible alternative is net-im/ekiga.
Related bug: http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=105670
Thanks,
Alastai
Hi Matt,
On 9/19/06, Matthew Marlowe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Can we integrate this somehow with a project (new?) to build ready-to-use
vmware or xen images? It would be silly to duplicate the work, and
testing would be much better this way.
Sure. For the moment, we're focusing on getting
Matthew Marlowe wrote:
>
> I would see the workflow proceed in the following manner:
> Releng herd makes available new official gentoo releases
>After a few weeks, the seeds herd takes releng product and creates new
> application/environment specific stage4 images
>Then, a
On Tuesday 19 September 2006 21:35, Daniel Black wrote:
> As reported
> https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=147800 gnutls-1.4.4 links itself
> against an existing gnutls-1.2* version if installed. I haven't been able
> to find the cause of this.
Bug fixed in gnutls-1.4.4-r1.
Testers still wel
> I've created a new project, called Gentoo Seeds [1]. The aim of the
> project is to create stage4 tarballs which can be used to 'seed' new boxes
> with ready-built Gentoo solutions.
>
Can we integrate this somehow with a project (new?) to build ready-to-use
vmware or xen images? It would be s
Hi,
I've created a new project, called Gentoo Seeds [1]. The aim of the project
is to create stage4 tarballs which can be used to 'seed' new boxes with
ready-built Gentoo solutions.
At the moment, we're working on a basic LAMP Server (which is why we're
hanging out in #gentoo-php), and talking a
Alec Warner wrote:
Pornview was unmasked; thanks to Ben Hodgetts for the fixes.
w00t, I can get back to my porn viewing!
--
Andrew Gaffneyhttp://dev.gentoo.org/~agaffney/
Gentoo Linux Developer Installer Project
--
gentoo-dev@gento
Pornview was unmasked; thanks to Ben Hodgetts for the fixes.
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
On Tue, 2006-09-19 at 02:20 -0400, Alec Warner wrote:
> Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > On Monday 18 September 2006 21:12, Chris Gianelloni wrote:
> >> I would prefer that we add this into a new release profile and move it
> >> "up" the profile inheritance tree as the non-acl profiles get
> >> deprecated
On Tue, 19 Sep 2006 09:50:54 +0200 Sune Kloppenborg Jeppesen
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| Anyone willing to help take care of this package please CC yourself
| on the bugs and provide a bump.
That should read "please CC yourself on the bugs, check the patch very
very carefully in both Vim and Emac
As reported
https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=147800 gnutls-1.4.4 links itself
against an existing gnutls-1.2* version if installed. I haven't been able to
find the cause of this.
After gnutls-1.4.4 is merged, this is evident by examining:
readelf -d /usr/lib/libgnutls-extra.so
- 0x00
Gustavo Felisberto wrote:
> net-mail/sendEmail
>
Took this one.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
the maintainer of dev-util/cscope mkennedy is not responding to bugmail
and the package has an open security bug.
https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=144869
Anyone willing to help take care of this package please CC yourself on the
bugs and provide a bump.
--
Sune Kloppenborg Jeppesen
Gen
20 matches
Mail list logo
