Re: [gentoo-dev] Need guidance for updating CHOST

2006-09-12 Thread Richard Fish
On 9/12/06, Mike Frysinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Tuesday 12 September 2006 22:23, Richard Fish wrote: > What I've basically been telling people is to: please god stop telling people that ive given Wernfried Haas proper instructions, he just needs to write them up Is there a "Readers D

Re: [gentoo-dev] Need guidance for updating CHOST

2006-09-12 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Tuesday 12 September 2006 22:23, Richard Fish wrote: > What I've basically been telling people is to: please god stop telling people that ive given Wernfried Haas proper instructions, he just needs to write them up -mike -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

[gentoo-dev] Need guidance for updating CHOST

2006-09-12 Thread Richard Fish
With the stabilization of the nptl-only glibc-2.4, many users are finding out that they installed their systems with CHOST=i386-pc-linux-gnu, and now need to either mask the new glibc, or figure out how to change their CHOST. I am not able to find any official guide on changing CHOST, and the inf

Re: [gentoo-dev] New libcaca license

2006-09-12 Thread Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò
On Wednesday 13 September 2006 03:19, Jason Wever wrote: > You appear to be violating the license by considering anyone else's > opinion but your own :-P I never said I will consider other opinions anyway ;) But you're probably right. -- Diego "Flameeyes" Pettenò - http://farragut.flameeyes.is-a

Re: [gentoo-dev] New libcaca license

2006-09-12 Thread Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò
On Wednesday 13 September 2006 02:37, Peter Gordon wrote: > The "DO WHAT THE FUCK YOU WANT" license is apparently a perfectly valid > (though amusing) Free software license, according to an old post [1] on the > debian-legal list. I never intended otherwise, but better safe than sorry, I'd rather c

Re: [gentoo-dev] New libcaca license

2006-09-12 Thread Jason Wever
On Wed, 13 Sep 2006 02:16:19 +0200 "Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > If nobody has a problem with this next evening (UTC+2), I'll commit > libcaca-0.99 under p.mask and this license to the licenses directory. You appear to be violating the license by considering anyone els

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Package Manager Specification: configuration protection

2006-09-12 Thread Ilya A. Volynets-Evenbakh
Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > On Tue, 12 Sep 2006 15:44:22 -0700 Zac Medico <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > | 3) Prevents /etc/foo from matching /etc/foobaz or /etc/foobaz/bar. > > Is this really desired behaviour? > > Once we decide that, I'll have a testsuite we can use. It's written for > Paludis, but

Re: [gentoo-dev] New libcaca license

2006-09-12 Thread Peter Gordon
Diego 'Flameeyes' Petten wrote: > So, I was working on updating libcaca to 0.99_bea4 version, but there's a new > license to add, and I'd liek to know if anybody has a problem with this ... > > http://sam.zoy.org/wtfpl/ > > -- Diego, The "DO WHAT THE FUCK YOU WANT" license is apparently a perf

[gentoo-dev] New libcaca license

2006-09-12 Thread Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò
So, I was working on updating libcaca to 0.99_bea4 version, but there's a new license to add, and I'd liek to know if anybody has a problem with this ... http://sam.zoy.org/wtfpl/ -- DO WHAT THE FUCK YOU WANT TO PUBLIC LICENSE Version 2, December 2004 Copyrig

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Package Manager Specification: configuration protection

2006-09-12 Thread Zac Medico
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > On Tue, 12 Sep 2006 15:44:22 -0700 Zac Medico <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > | 3) Prevents /etc/foo from matching /etc/foobaz or /etc/foobaz/bar. > > Is this really desired behaviour? In my opinion, it is a desirable change.

Re: [gentoo-dev] hackergotchis + rss feeds

2006-09-12 Thread Hasan Khalil
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Sep 12, 2006, at 18:50, Hasan Khalil wrote: Is my commonly used buddy icon pic[1] good enough? It's not exactly a hackergotchi, but it is _something_... Oops, meant to send that only to Steve. Sorry for the excess traffic. While I'm at it th

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Package Manager Specification: configuration protection

2006-09-12 Thread Ciaran McCreesh
On Tue, 12 Sep 2006 15:44:22 -0700 Zac Medico <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: | 3) Prevents /etc/foo from matching /etc/foobaz or /etc/foobaz/bar. Is this really desired behaviour? Once we decide that, I'll have a testsuite we can use. It's written for Paludis, but easily portable. -- Ciaran McCrees

Re: [gentoo-dev] hackergotchis + rss feeds

2006-09-12 Thread Hasan Khalil
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Sep 12, 2006, at 11:55, Steve Dibb wrote: Which brings me to my next point -- hardly anyone on planet has one. Send one in! It doesn't have to be a headshot either, an avatar will do nicely. Is my commonly used buddy icon pic[1] good eno

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Package Manager Specification: configuration protection

2006-09-12 Thread Zac Medico
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > On Tue, 12 Sep 2006 10:19:40 +0200 Simon Stelling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > | > Protected Locations > | > === > | > > | > Protected locations are determined by the ``CONFIG_PROTECT`` > | > environment vari

Re: [gentoo-dev] xinitrc/startx scripts unification

2006-09-12 Thread Donnie Berkholz
Lukasz Pawelczyk wrote: > I wanted to fill bugzilla report about this but found few existing > without neither serious solution nor being current. > > There is an incosistency in current xinitrc behaviour (i'm only talking > about xinitrc run through startx, not {k,g,x}dm). Either Joshua Baergen

Re: [gentoo-dev] GIMP 1.2 has gotta die

2006-09-12 Thread Nick Devito
On Tue, 2006-09-12 at 11:56 +0200, Luca Barbato wrote: > Hanno Böck wrote: > > Am Dienstag, 12. September 2006 02:46 schrieb Michael Cummings: > >> Looks like that will break media-gfx/frontline (=media-gfx/gimp-1.2*) > >> and gimp-freetype-0.2-r3 (also =media-gfx/gimp-1.2*). > > > > frontline is

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Package Manager Specification: configuration protection

2006-09-12 Thread Zac Medico
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > On Tue, 12 Sep 2006 10:19:40 +0200 Simon Stelling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > | > Protected Locations > | > === > | > > | > Protected locations are determined by the ``CONFIG_PROTECT`` > | > environment vari

[gentoo-dev] hackergotchis + rss feeds

2006-09-12 Thread Steve Dibb
I finally got off my butt and added a small tweak to the feeds for Planet Gentoo, and now you get to see the hackergotchis in your RSS reader as well. Which brings me to my next point -- hardly anyone on planet has one. Send one in! It doesn't have to be a headshot either, an avatar will do

Re: [gentoo-dev] Suggestion: Globalization of some USE flags

2006-09-12 Thread arfrever
I would like to suggest to globalize cairo, openexr and udev USE flags. These USE flags are used by enough amount of packages. Also cairo and udev USE flags are set defaultly in many profiles. Arfrever -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

[gentoo-dev] Toys for arch / release people

2006-09-12 Thread Ciaran McCreesh
According to some arch / release types, there're a few simple queries and reports they'd find very useful. Since these kinds of things are very easy to do if you have a decent API, I put together a tool for a few of them. As of sys-apps/paludis-0.6.2, the adjutrix client can: * display a "lagging

[gentoo-dev] profiles/default-linux/$arch/ChangeLog reminder

2006-09-12 Thread Chris Gianelloni
Several architectures now have a ChangeLog for their default-linux/$arch directories. If you make changes to these architecture's profiles, please put a ChangeLog entry. [EMAIL PROTECTED] /var/cvsroot/gentoo-x86/profiles/default-linux $ find -name ChangeLog | sort ./alpha/ChangeLog ./amd64/Change

Re: [gentoo-dev] GIMP 1.2 has gotta die

2006-09-12 Thread Luca Barbato
Hanno Böck wrote: > Am Dienstag, 12. September 2006 02:46 schrieb Michael Cummings: >> Looks like that will break media-gfx/frontline (=media-gfx/gimp-1.2*) >> and gimp-freetype-0.2-r3 (also =media-gfx/gimp-1.2*). > > frontline is dead upstream, has no metadata and last changelog-entry is about >

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Package Manager Specification: configuration protection

2006-09-12 Thread Ciaran McCreesh
On Tue, 12 Sep 2006 10:19:40 +0200 Simon Stelling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: | > Protected Locations | > === | > | > Protected locations are determined by the ``CONFIG_PROTECT`` | > environment variable, which is defined in the profiles and which | > may be augmented or overridden

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Package Manager Specification: configuration protection

2006-09-12 Thread Simon Stelling
> Protected Locations > === > > Protected locations are determined by the ``CONFIG_PROTECT`` environment > variable, which is defined in the profiles and which may be augmented or > overridden by the current environment and user configuration files. This > variable contains a space