Alec Warner wrote:
> I think both our points are that there is a middle ground between
> screwing the user outright and holding their hand. If you want to
> trumpet the change on forums, on www, on -announce, get the message out
> there; then I'd be more for a change like that. The problem is las
Zac Medico wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Alec Warner wrote:
Zac Medico wrote:
I'm not sure what the probability of people hurting themselves like
this is. Perhaps it's a negligible corner case and a note in the
upgrade guide will be enough to keep the vast majority of u
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Alec Warner wrote:
> Zac Medico wrote:
> I'm not sure what the probability of people hurting themselves like
> this is. Perhaps it's a negligible corner case and a note in the
> upgrade guide will be enough to keep the vast majority of users on the
>
On Sun, 13 Aug 2006 13:01:41 -0400
Alec Warner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Zac Medico wrote:
> > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> > Hash: SHA1
> >
> > Brian Harring wrote:
> >
> >>Said single inheritance protection was added 06/05/06 (rev 3544),
> >>stabled for x86 roughly 06/22/06.
> >>
>
Zac Medico wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Brian Harring wrote:
Said single inheritance protection was added 06/05/06 (rev 3544),
stabled for x86 roughly 06/22/06.
Hasn't even yet made it to a release media- meaning folk installing
from the most current release media st
On Sat, 2006-08-12 at 17:17 +0200, Harald van Dijk wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 12, 2006 at 02:42:32PM +, Francesco Riosa wrote:
> > [...]
> > >>
> > >> $ cd gentoo-x86/*/foo
> > >
> > > This works better:
> > >
> > > $ cd gentoo-x86/*/foo/
> > >
> > > This avoids the case where a file by the same na
