On 8/1/06, Carsten Lohrke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
And that's why it has been announced as the best since sliced bred - urging
all users to give it a try, but with the option to point with the finger on
them, laughing "Ha, ha, you should have known dumb nuts.", later. Brett is
absolutely right
On Wed, Aug 02, 2006 at 02:24:17AM +0200, Carsten Lohrke wrote:
> On Monday 31 July 2006 07:05, Seemant Kulleen wrote:
> > OK, let's start with: what exactly is the problem?
> 1) Please reread my replies in the first sunrise thread. Points are:
1) no security,
Suggest you read their responses, an
Hi All,
Just a quick reminder that the User Representative Elections are due to
conclude in a few days. If you haven't yet placed your vote I would urge
you to do so at this forums thread:
http://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-t-482799.html
Have a nice day,
Christel
signature.asc
Description: T
x11-plugins/gkrellm-alltraxclock - [1] PMASKED
net-libs/libical-moz - [2] [3] PMASKED
net-misc/bk2site [4] PMASKED
# Alec Warner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (01 Aug 2006)
# media-gfx/pornview masked for Treecleaners for bug(s) 141588 93500 120376
# Removal in 30 days
media-gfx/pornview
[5] [6] [7]
# a
On Thursday 01 January 1970 01:00, Alec Warner wrote:
> eclass changes? You can't even commit eclasses to it...
Eclass changes in the main tree, including all relevant ebuilds updated, but
breaking the ebuilds in the Surise overlay, having whining users or borked
systems in the worst case.
Ca
On Monday 31 July 2006 13:01, Christian Andreetta wrote:
> Seemant Kulleen wrote:
> > On Sun, 2006-07-30 at 23:50 -0400, Brett I. Holcomb wrote:
> >> My concern is beyond me. As I stated I know enough about what to
> >> expect IF I use sunrise. But many do not and with it becoming official
> >>
Carsten Lohrke wrote:
On Monday 31 July 2006 07:05, Seemant Kulleen wrote:
OK, let's start with: what exactly is the problem?
Please reread my replies in the first sunrise thread. Points are: no security,
issues with eclass changes which will result in bug spam, the fact that
eclass changes
On Monday 31 July 2006 07:05, Seemant Kulleen wrote:
> OK, let's start with: what exactly is the problem?
Please reread my replies in the first sunrise thread. Points are: no security,
issues with eclass changes which will result in bug spam, the fact that
sunrise is a bunch of arbitrary package
On Monday 31 July 2006 04:52, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Sunday 30 July 2006 22:28, Dan Meltzer wrote:
> > 1) Users can submit patches/ideas to bugs.g.o at whatever frequency
> > they desire, contributing to gentoo casually.
>
> load up your browser and check out how many bugs are assigned
> to '[E
Stuart Herbert wrote:
> Hi Mike,
>
> On 8/1/06, Mike Frysinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> i'm tired of looking at this package, anyone care about this thing enough to
>> be its maintainer ?
>> -mike
>
> I'll take it, if no-one else wants it.
>
> Best regards,
> Stu
so you are not leaving the
> 3) misc
>
> Where are our ppc-developers? We went through the devalias
> and found some inactive devs. Currently we are 10 quite
> acvite and 15 kinda inactive or supporting devs. Probably
> we should remove them from the devalias?
I am, and will be for some time, very busy with real life st
On Mon, 31 Jul 2006 19:25:20 +0200
foser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [...]
> 1. Stale ebuilds are often stale for a reason, there is obviously not
> enough interest to add and maintain them. Not just on the developer
> side, but also on the user side. If someone really cared enough
> he/she would
On 8/1/06, Jeroen Roovers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
# emerge --submit-info
* sys-apps/portage generates emerge --info output and uploads it
relatively tamper-proof to tickets.g.o, and
* returns a ticket to the user, a unique number that he or she can
communicate to developers and active users
Hi!
On Tue, 01 Aug 2006, Jeroen Roovers wrote:
> On Tue, 1 Aug 2006 10:21:53 +0200
> > Idea: should it be more obvious in emerge --info and ebuild
> > failure that an overlay is involved? If it's obvious enough,
> > I don't see a problem. Also, a command that lists all
> > installed packages that
Hi Mike,
On 8/1/06, Mike Frysinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
i'm tired of looking at this package, anyone care about this thing enough to
be its maintainer ?
-mike
I'll take it, if no-one else wants it.
Best regards,
Stu
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
On Tue, 1 Aug 2006 10:21:53 +0200
Tobias Klausmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Idea: should it be more obvious in emerge --info and ebuild
> failure that an overlay is involved? If it's obvious enough, I
> don't see a problem. Also, a command that lists all installed
> packages that come from an
Could you (or someone else) send out the agenda and a second reminder
a short while (e.g. 1-2 days) before the actual meeting. I'd very much
appreciate that, and i guess others may too.
cheers,
Wernfried
PS: I know _i_ could volunteer as i already suggested it, but then we
want someone re
This is your monthly friendly reminder ! Same bat time (typically the
2nd Thursday once a month), same bat channel (#gentoo-council @
irc.freenode.net) !
If you have something you'd wish for us to chat about, maybe even
vote on, let us know ! Simply reply to this e-mail for the whole
Gentoo dev
On Mon, Jul 31, 2006 at 08:53:00PM -0400, Doug Goldstein wrote:
> Brixy!! You can't leave. Who else will I ramble to on IRC after coming
> back from the bars? Who else will fix my wireless adapter?
You can still ramble to me on IRC - it's not like I'm dropping off the
face of the Earth. As for you
Hi!
I'm not a dev (just someone donating 10GB of traffic per day from
his private server to Gentoo), but that's exactly why I think I
need to chime in.
On Mon, 31 Jul 2006, foser wrote:
> 1. Stale ebuilds are often stale for a reason, there is
> obviously not enough interest to add and maintain
20 matches
Mail list logo
