I wouldn't know the first thing to do with Java, but jrocket-jdk-bin
has support for 1.4 and 1.5 on ia64.
Aron
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
Simon Stelling wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I just noticed that the USE flag 'firefox' is a local one. I think it should
> be
> global, though:
If this happens, could you also close
https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=96473 :)
--de.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Brian,
I was looking through /usr/bin/emerge and lines 3477-3481 seemed to
best fit what displayConfirmPrompt is trying to supplement. The check
on line 3477 is against a "No" returned from userPrompt(), and then a
system exit code is issued by caller (line 3481).
Was unable to find any other in
Hi Mike,
On 7/21/06, Mike Frysinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
in Gentoo or in general ? in general, kaffe should support pretty much all
our arches, but in Gentoo, i dont have time to get it working for:
Last time I checked, kaffe didn't provide a libjvm, which is used for
embedding Java in
On 7/6/06, Patrick Lauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
So here's my nominations:
Flameeyes
brix
lu_zero
kosmikus
Stuart
jakub
marienz
patrick
Thanks, but I don't accept. I'm planning on leaving Gentoo.
Best regards,
Stu
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
On Fri, 21 Jul 2006 01:05:20 -0700 Brian Harring <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
| Just so we're clear, I probably will wedgie anyone who suggests
| trying to extend the existing tree format with N categories per pkg-
| sounds nice on paper, but it makes lookup a serious pita-
| sys-apps/portage, we'll
On Wed, 19 Jul 2006 11:10:51 -0400 Ned Ludd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| Every single year quarter after quarter the more updates
| that happen the slower portage is becoming.
| Care to solve that?
This is a minute amount of time in comparison to anything significant.
If you care about Portage sp
On Fri, 21 Jul 2006 10:10:42 +0200
Krzysiek Pawlik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Joshua Nichols wrote:
> > Doesn't support:
> > alpha
> Alpha has compaq-{jdk,jre} which requires nast hacks with glibc and
> doesn't work - details are in virtual/{jdk,jre} bugs.
compaq-{jdk,jre} were masked by YosWinK
Joshua Nichols wrote:
> Doesn't support:
> alpha
Alpha has compaq-{jdk,jre} which requires nast hacks with glibc and
doesn't work - details are in virtual/{jdk,jre} bugs.
--
Krzysiek Pawlik key id: 0xBC51
desktop-misc, desktop-dock, desktop-wm, x86, java, apache...
signature.asc
Desc
On Fri, Jul 21, 2006 at 08:44:35AM +0100, Stuart Herbert wrote:
> In fact, categories do not give us the complete ability to have two
> packages with the same upstream name in the tree ... because binary
> packages do not support category names at all.
B.
They do actually- the bintree *re
On 7/19/06, Kevin F. Quinn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
In my opinion moving packages from one category to another just causes
unnecessary disruption to the tree - all relevant dependencies
throughout the tree have to be altered, putting current installations
out-of-date with respect to it.
Some
11 matches
Mail list logo
