On Mon, 2006-06-26 at 17:36 -0600, Lance Albertson wrote:
> Donnie Berkholz wrote:
>
> > Agree, but with the caveat that devs must still be at least subscribed
> > to -core even if they choose not to read it. This way, you could have a
> > -dev-announce that also refers to something private on -co
On Tuesday 27 June 2006 18:32, Donnie Berkholz wrote:
> Chris Gianelloni wrote:
> > OK, guys, I was speaking with vapier earlier about the possibility of
> > getting gcc 4.1.1 stable for the 2006.1 release. We've managed to build
> > some release media with it, and are planning on doing more testi
/me gives some help to Dan
sorry --> []
--
Raphael Marichez aka Falco
pgp2puNJzRcLr.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On 6/27/06, Chris Gianelloni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
OK, guys, I was speaking with vapier earlier about the possibility of
getting gcc 4.1.1 stable for the 2006.1 release. We've managed to build
some release media with it, and are planning on doing more testing with
it. What we really need i
Chris Gianelloni wrote:
> OK, guys, I was speaking with vapier earlier about the possibility of
> getting gcc 4.1.1 stable for the 2006.1 release. We've managed to build
> some release media with it, and are planning on doing more testing with
> it. What we really need is for more people to test
OK, guys, I was speaking with vapier earlier about the possibility of
getting gcc 4.1.1 stable for the 2006.1 release. We've managed to build
some release media with it, and are planning on doing more testing with
it. What we really need is for more people to test this on various
platforms and to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dan Podeanu wrote:
> help
help: help [-s] [pattern ...]
Display helpful information about builtin commands. If PATTERN is
specified, gives detailed help on all commands matching PATTERN,
otherwise a list of the builtins is printed. The
Hi folks,
I've done some works meanwhile:
+ primary database structure
+ a few scanners (gtk, apache2, linux-kernel, gnome)
+ some small webfrontend
+ an quick download url redirector
For more information see:
http://sourcefarm.metux.de/
cu
--
-
> If you want to sync just part of the tree, look into setting '--exclude'
> or '--exclude-from' options via PORTAGE_RSYNC_EXTRA_OPTS in make.conf.
> See rsync(1) and make.conf(5). Never tried it myself, but it should
> work.
i'm using it on my laptop and it works very well :)
i've saved 320Mo !
help
On Tue, 27 Jun 2006 17:54:02 +0200
Raphael Marichez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> IMHO this seems a good idea. The portage tree is growing every week,
> every month, and it doesn't really suit for the very little systems
> (embedded linux) nowadays. Furthermore, with the old 2.0-portage, the
> sync
Enrico Weigelt wrote:
* Raphael Marichez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb:
IMHO this seems a good idea. The portage tree is growing every week,
every month, and it doesn't really suit for the very little systems
(embedded linux) nowadays. Furthermore, with the old 2.0-portage,
the syncing and cac
* Raphael Marichez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb:
> IMHO this seems a good idea. The portage tree is growing every week,
> every month, and it doesn't really suit for the very little systems
> (embedded linux) nowadays. Furthermore, with the old 2.0-portage,
> the syncing and caching had become r
Stuart Herbert wrote:
> On 6/25/06, Donnie Berkholz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> This topic has come up in the past, and I'd like to revive it once
>> again. The gentoo-dev list has gotten a lower and lower signal to noise
>> ratio over the past year or two, and it's difficult to dig out the stuff
Michael Cummings wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Alec Warner wrote:
I'd prefer if you are going to remove a package and you want
treecleaners to do it; either talk to a treecleaners project member on
irc or via the alias first, or just assign it to maintainer-needed and
CC
>
> I have to admit - I'd never heard of the project until now (so maybe I'm
> not alone...?).
same for me (i'm a new dev, but i have been reading and learning
www.gentoo.org for a while now :) )
IMHO this seems a good idea. The portage tree is growing every week, every
month, and it doesn't
As long as it doesn't involve spanky I think we won't lose all our users
because they suddenly became blind. Its the first time I've heard of the
project as well. I knew that there were a few people going through and
removing stuff but...
(that's right, i'm recommending the
special centerfold
I am sending this out (and cross-posting it) to let everyone know that I
have just added a ChangeLog to default-linux/x86 to track changes.
Anyone who makes any changes to the default-linux/x86 profile, or any of
the sub-profiles, should make a ChangeLog entry. It works perfectly
fine with "echang
On Tue, 27 Jun 2006 16:03:32 +0200
Enrico Weigelt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> But:
>
> * I'm fairly new here and not familar with the development and
> qm process yet, so I need some assistance.
>
>
> Anything still onclear on my last posting ?
My apologies, Enrico, for snapping out on you
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Alec Warner wrote:
> I'd prefer if you are going to remove a package and you want
> treecleaners to do it; either talk to a treecleaners project member on
> irc or via the alias first, or just assign it to maintainer-needed and
> CC treecleaners.
> [1
I'd prefer if you are going to remove a package and you want
treecleaners to do it; either talk to a treecleaners project member on
irc or via the alias first, or just assign it to maintainer-needed and
CC treecleaners.
I don't want a million bugs assigned to treecleaners. The point of the
p
On Tuesday 27 June 2006 10:03, Enrico Weigelt wrote:
> * I'm fairly new here and not familar with the development and
> qm process yet, so I need some assistance.
http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/devrel/handbook/handbook.xml?part=1&chap=2
-mike
pgpM4ocdwy8G1.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Tuesday 27 June 2006 09:21, Andrej Kacian wrote:
> On Tue, 27 Jun 2006 13:07:45 +0200
>
> Enrico Weigelt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > As I have been swamped with emails, private messages and phone calls
> > > from certain people, I will retract my resignation for the final time.
> >
> > I'm
* Andrej Kacian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb:
> On Tue, 27 Jun 2006 13:07:45 +0200
> Enrico Weigelt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > As I have been swamped with emails, private messages and phone calls
> > > from certain people, I will retract my resignation for the final time.
> >
> > I'm fairl
On Tue, 27 Jun 2006 13:07:45 +0200
Enrico Weigelt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > As I have been swamped with emails, private messages and phone calls
> > from certain people, I will retract my resignation for the final time.
>
> I'm fairly new to Gentoo, but I'd like to help.
> So, what shall I d
On Mon, 2006-06-26 at 13:10 -0700, Donnie Berkholz wrote:
> Chris Gianelloni wrote:
> > - Create a new list ("gentoo-core-announce" ?)
> > Reading: dev-only
> > Posting: dev-only, reply-to set to gentoo-core
> > This is the reference list of things (policy, decisions and discussions
> > in progress
On 6/27/06, Simon Stelling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I don't think so. As I understand it, it's not the amount of threads that makes
the noise, it's mainly all the sub-sub-sub-sub-threads.
As long as they're about Gentoo, they're not 'noise' to everyone. I
confess I don't read every email on
On 6/27/06, Enrico Weigelt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
(At this point, I'd like to remind you on my distro independent
QM project ...)
Never heard of it, sorry.
*BUT*: it doesn't make any sense just talking about it. Simply do it
or forget it. Only talking is nonsense.
If I was admin @gentoo.o
Lance Albertson wrote:
> I'd rather not create a -core-announce. The amount of times those types
> of things come up on the list are rare. It would be easier to have an
> standard subject heading (maybe ANNOUNCEMENT:) that people can use in
> their filters. If devs start abusing it, then we'll vote
Stuart Herbert wrote:
> But I also think you're over-exaggerating the situation by a long way,
> sorry.
I don't think so. As I understand it, it's not the amount of threads that makes
the noise, it's mainly all the sub-sub-sub-sub-threads.
--
Kind Regards,
Simon Stelling
Gentoo/AMD64 Developer
* Gustavo Felisberto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb:
> Gnophone is upstream dead. Does not build in amd64 (and probably other arches)
> failling on configure.
Does anyone have an amd64 box I could play a little bit with ?
I'd like to have a look at it.
cu
--
--
* Stuart Herbert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb:
> On 6/25/06, Donnie Berkholz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >This topic has come up in the past, and I'd like to revive it once
> >again. The gentoo-dev list has gotten a lower and lower signal to noise
> >ratio over the past year or two, and it's diffic
* Jory A. Pratt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb:
Hi,
> As I have been swamped with emails, private messages and phone calls
> from certain people, I will retract my resignation for the final time.
I'm fairly new to Gentoo, but I'd like to help.
So, what shall I do ?
cu
--
--
On 6/25/06, Donnie Berkholz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
This topic has come up in the past, and I'd like to revive it once
again. The gentoo-dev list has gotten a lower and lower signal to noise
ratio over the past year or two, and it's difficult to dig out the stuff
that's truly required reading.
34 matches
Mail list logo
