-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
These have been in pmask for quite some time, Due to this fact I will
remove them in 7 days instead of 30. If anyone objects I will extend
the time, however most have been masked for well over 3 months ( some
for years ) which IMHO justifies a shorter
Hi,
This is an automatically created email message.
http://gentoo.tamperd.net/stable has just been updated with 15763 ebuilds.
The page shows results from a number of tests that are run against the ebuilds.
The tests are:
* if a version has been masked for 30 days or more.
* if an arch was in KE
Gustavo Felisberto wrote:
> Gnophone is upstream dead. Does not build in amd64 (and probably other arches)
> failling on configure.
>
> I'm going to give this two weeks an then remove it if no one offers to solve
> this problems. (There is no open bug so one should contact me directly)
>
Open on
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ryan Hill wrote:
> Michael Cummings wrote:
>> OK, I attempted this in November of 05 (then forgot?), but since no one
>> responded to my last round, it has been removed. Happy gentoo'ing,
>
> *yay*
heh - only bug I've seen crop up is the occasional g
Lars Weiler wrote:
> Another upgrade for 2006.1 might be Xorg-7.1. ppc does not
> rely on any binary-driver which is affected by the
> ABI-change. This version of X has been tested by several
> developers and found to be stable. But we need to check
> Donnie's opinion about that move.
>
> A pro
Lars Weiler wrote:
> * Donnie Berkholz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [06/06/24 20:06 -0700]:
>> I propose that all need-to-know announcements and decisions be posted to
>> a separate, moderated (or restricted posting) gentoo-dev-announce list
>> to ensure that no developers lose track of what really matters.
Harald van Dijk wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 21, 2006 at 05:20:47PM +0200, Carsten Lohrke wrote:
>> On Wednesday 21 June 2006 15:44, Stefan Schweizer wrote:
>>> qt3 - enable optional qt3 support
>>> qt4 - enable optional qt4 support
>> That will be a mess to support in the long run.
>
> Why?
Ditto. Can a
* Lars Weiler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [06/06/25 23:24 +0200]:
> Furthermore we want to extend the gcc-upgrade-guide, as we
> can't use gcc-4 with glibc-2.3. Therefore the user need to
> follow a special upgrade-path.
Upgrade on this one (thanks Flameeyes): gcc-4.1.x works with
glibc-2.3, as vapier fi
Hi,
the Gentoo/PPC team had a meeting from 19UTC until 20:30UTC.
topics:
1) toolchain switch for 2006.1
2) other upgrades for 2006.1
3) open discussion
We decided to make a toolchain-switch for 2006.1 and upgrade
to gcc-4.1.1 along with glibc-2.4. Quite all ppc devs made
tests with that toolc
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Over this past weekend, I made the changes I proposed last week.
Everything related to it is currently sitting in package.mask:
# Joshua Nichols<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (24 Jun 2006)
# Masked for testing changes to Java
>=dev-java/java-config-1.3
dev-java
Hi Simon
Thanks for the clarification!
неділя, 25. червень 2006 22:17, Simon Stelling Ви написали:
> i'm not maintaining anything, just keywording it for amd64. wouldn't it be
> easier to only list people that are in the sci herd?
No, because there are people who are not on sci herd but who maint
Michael Cummings wrote:
> OK, I attempted this in November of 05 (then forgot?), but since no one
> responded to my last round, it has been removed. Happy gentoo'ing,
*yay*
--de.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
George Shapovalov wrote:
> sci-biology: 58
> rather large, may be worth splitting more, no particular suggestions yet
> though, devs:
> ribosome, blubb, corsair, j4rg0n, mcummings, sediener, pbienst, apokorny,
> hansmi?, phosphan, lostlogic?
i'm not maintaining anything, just keywording it for
Luca Barbato wrote:
> Edward Catmur wrote:
>> On Sat, 2006-06-24 at 13:05 +0200, Luca Barbato wrote:
>>> (from critics)
>>> - What is wrong with the model (each point 2 lines at least, 4 at most)
>>> - What you'd do as alternative as the criticized point ( 2 lines again)
>
> Let me reformat a bit
First, thanks to everybody who responded! (not that tehre were many ;)).
Interestingly, the most positive result so far seems to be two people
expressing interest to join :), so we need at least one more mentor I'd say..
I'll start by refreshing general changes that were proposed:
1. Make Scient
Simon Stelling wrote:
> Right. So you agree with the intention, but not with the wording. This
> is exactly what I'm after. At least here in Europe, judges have to
> 'interprete' the law. They judge whether somebody is guilty or not based
> on the _intentions_ that are behind the law. If the law ha
On Sun, 25 Jun 2006 10:33:58 -0500 "Jory A. Pratt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
| Sorry to everyone else for letting the project itself down with my
| hasty decision of resigning last night.
Oh, I'm sure everyone's used to it by now.
--
Ciaran McCreesh
Mail: ciaran dot mccreesh at blue
Gustavo Felisberto wrote:
> Gnophone is upstream dead. Does not build in amd64 (and probably other arches)
> failling on configure.
>
> I'm going to give this two weeks an then remove it if no one offers to solve
> this problems. (There is no open bug so one should contact me directly)
>
What is
On Sun, 2006-06-25 at 10:33 -0500, Jory A. Pratt wrote:
[snip]
> P.S
> I will not leave you all the users with noone to maintain the packages
> that 98% of you all depend on when it comes to a browser.
Thanks..
/me guesses you had a few brews when you wrote said mail.
--
Ned Ludd <[EM
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Henrik Brix Andersen wrote:
> Hi Jory,
>
> On Sat, Jun 24, 2006 at 09:29:51PM -0500, Jory A. Pratt wrote:
>> Security team can do as they wish, they do not take the user to mind
>> when they want to make hasty decision, without first attempting to
>>
Gnophone is upstream dead. Does not build in amd64 (and probably other arches)
failling on configure.
I'm going to give this two weeks an then remove it if no one offers to solve
this problems. (There is no open bug so one should contact me directly)
--
Gustavo Felisberto
(HumpBack)
Web: http://
James Potts wrote:
I hate to put it to you this way, but if you give people an inch,
they'll take a mile. Yes, political correctnes is unproductive. This
is why decisions like the one made here need to be thought out better
before being made. But once the decision is made, it should be
applied
Mike Frysinger gentoo.org> writes:
> the examples should use $ as the shell prompt, not #
Fixed. Thanks for catching that. :)
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
app-mobilephone/openobex-apps has been masked and it will be removed
from the tree in 30 days.
Those who want a OBEX server should use app-mobilephone/sobexsrv.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
24 matches
Mail list logo
