Hi,
This is an automatically created email message.
http://gentoo.tamperd.net/stable has just been updated with 15664 ebuilds.
The page shows results from a number of tests that are run against the ebuilds.
The tests are:
* if a version has been masked for 30 days or more.
* if an arch was in KE
Stefan Schweizer wrote:
Hi,
solar has requested an account on overlays.gentoo.org for the embedded
overlay for you.
Your password: DX7wnSe40Y
Kind regards,
Stefan
o_O
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
On Sunday 18 June 2006 14:11, Roy Marples wrote:
> On Sunday 18 June 2006 17:12, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > On Sunday 18 June 2006 04:32, Philip Webb wrote:
> > > I suspect most users wb happy to see packages stabilised a bit sooner,
> > > even if they're only 95 % reliable (another smile).
> >
>
On 6/18/06, Philip Webb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
060618 Roy Marples wrote:
> On Sunday 18 June 2006 17:12, Mike Frysinger wrote:
>> On Sunday 18 June 2006 04:32, Philip Webb wrote:
>>> I suspect most users wb happy to see packages stabilised a bit sooner,
>>> even if they're only 95 % reliabl
060618 Roy Marples wrote:
> On Sunday 18 June 2006 17:12, Mike Frysinger wrote:
>> On Sunday 18 June 2006 04:32, Philip Webb wrote:
>>> I suspect most users wb happy to see packages stabilised a bit sooner,
>>> even if they're only 95 % reliable (another smile).
>> people are *not* happy when the
I'm surprised from the lack of "Thanks a lot Java Team", so please let
me have the honour to be the first on this ml ;-)
The work done has been impressive, the number of package involved great,
thanks _a_lot_ for all you did.
Francesco R.
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
On Sunday 18 June 2006 17:12, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Sunday 18 June 2006 04:32, Philip Webb wrote:
> > I suspect most users wb happy to see packages stabilised a bit sooner,
> > even if they're only 95 % reliable (another smile).
>
> people are *not* happy when their machine cannot boot
> -mi
Donnie Berkholz wrote:
> Last year right after LWE August, Corey set up a 1-day Gentoo developer
> conference. Is anyone who's attending LWE going to pick up the ball, now
> that he's gone?
>
> Much of the information is supposedly on the devwiki [1], but it's
> somewhat broken right now. The infr
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Duncan wrote:
> Joshua Nichols <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted [EMAIL PROTECTED],
> excerpted below, on Sun, 18 Jun 2006 10:39:06 -0500:
>
>> I have written documentation on switching to the new system, from the
>> user's perspective, over at our wiki [6]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Duncan wrote:
> Joshua Nichols <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted [EMAIL PROTECTED],
> excerpted below, on Sun, 18 Jun 2006 10:39:06 -0500:
>
>> I have written documentation on switching to the new system, from the
>> user's perspective, over at our wiki [6]
Joshua Nichols <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted [EMAIL PROTECTED],
excerpted below, on Sun, 18 Jun 2006 10:39:06 -0500:
> I have written documentation on switching to the new system, from the
> user's perspective, over at our wiki [6]
>
> [6]
> https://projects.gentooexperimental.org/expj/wiki/Using_m
On Sunday 18 June 2006 12:08, Sune Kloppenborg Jeppesen wrote:
> dev-lang/pike is without an active maintainer and has an open security bug
> 136065
i'm already working on an updated ebuild
-mike
pgpSZHyiOSVIc.pgp
Description: PGP signature
dev-lang/pike is without an active maintainer and has an open security bug
136065
https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=136065
Anyone willing to take care of this package in the future, please update
metadata/herd info and CC yourself on the bug.
--
Sune Kloppenborg Jeppesen
Gentoo Linux Se
On Sunday 18 June 2006 04:32, Philip Webb wrote:
> I suspect most users wb happy to see packages stabilised a bit sooner,
> even if they're only 95 % reliable (another smile).
people are *not* happy when their machine cannot boot
-mike
pgp7nVT5KH2DY.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
= Background =
As some might have noticed, Java 1.5 has been package.masked for some
time now. There are a number of issues introduced with 1.5 that have
kept it in package.mask. Please see the Java 1.5 FAQ [1] for more details.
[1] http://www.gentoo
* No maintainer.
* It is a library w/o executable in the tree (would be Rainbow, Crossbow
or Arrow).
* It has one open bug (#88302).
* No upstream release since 2002, so little chance to fix bug #88302.
app-text/bow is already masked, pending removal in 30 days unless
someone steps up to mainta
060617 Mike Frysinger wrote:
> can people give 1.11.15-r3 a run through ?
I've been using 1.12.0-r1 since 060604 without any problems ... (smile)
I suspect most users wb happy to see packages stabilised a bit sooner,
even if they're only 95 % reliable (another smile).
--
=
17 matches
Mail list logo
